WA Initiative Would Require Background Check for Private Gun Sales
Which only the most submissive will obey
OLYMPIA – Advocates seeking to expand the use of background checks on gun sales submitted a Washington state ballot initiative Tuesday, taking a new approach after both federal and state lawmakers passed on similar proposals.
The plan would require background checks for online sales and private transactions, such as those that occur at gun shows. The checks would be conducted at federally licensed firearm dealers, where people already must undergo such scrutiny before purchasing a new weapon.
Supporters said the measure wouldn't stop all gun violence but would prevent people who shouldn't have guns – criminals and the mentally ill – from easily acquiring them. They contended that the public is ready to push ahead with the idea.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OK, I RTFA and still don't see how a set individuals - seller and buyer - will magically complete a background check via the FFL.
- Does the FFL now have an obligation to donate his time and phone to complete the background check? (Which FFL? Who determines this?)
- Do the seller/buyer have to re-imburse him for his time? (how much? Who sets the limit?)
- How much responsibility does the FFL take on to ensure he is getting the right information if no 4473 form is filled out? (a 4473 is only supposed to be filled out for tranfers the FFL is responsible for - not just anybody who happens to walk up to him)
- Who compensates the FFL for sales lost while he is enabling these transactions? (Did you ever see how brisk sales are at some gun show booths?)