Brickbat: St. Romanus, Building Code Enforcement Agent

Officials in Yavapai County, Arizona, have ordered David Smith to remove a 9-foot-tall statue of a gargoyle from his yard or cover the statue's genitalia. They say neighbors have complained about the statue's anatomy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Feelings of inadequacy abound in Arizona.
hey if you ever saw a giant gargoyle dick looming over the horizon, you'd be feeling inaedequate too...just saying
I have, and I wasn't.
giant gargoyle dick looming over the horizon
Wasn't that a Loudon Wainwright song?
"Gargoyle?" Is that what the kids are calling it these days?
"Cover up" the genitals by putting another gargoyle next to it such that it looks like the second one is giving the first one a blowjob. Since you can't see the genitals any more, it can't be obscene. 🙂
County officials say the statue's genitalia can be offensive.
And the statue's *ears* are *definitely* offensive.
"can be offensive"
Yes, but is it *illegal* - that's the question that's really important.