EPA Nominee Held Up in Battle Over Agency's Vast Powers
It reaches into every area of life
As Republican senators delay confirmation votes on several of President Barack Obama's nominees, one of those stuck in the waiting queue is Gina McCarthy, his choice to head the Environmental Protection Agency.
There's more here than just the normal Washington tactical maneuvering – it reflects Senate Republicans' strategy to use McCarthy's nomination as leverage in forcing changes in the way the EPA operates.
And the power struggle affects Americans far beyond Washington, D.C. – whether the water they drink is clean or dirty, whether the company that employs them must comply with costly environmental regulations, or not.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
whether the water they drink is clean or dirty
Yeah, I'm fairly certain I pay the local water company to operate their treatment plant that produces potable water. The Feds add their tax to my bill and make water more expensive... maybe that's what the writer means.