Sex Workers Push Back Against LinkedIn Prostitution Ban
You let politicians on here and not hookers?
LinkedIn made news when it updated its privacy policy to ban sex workers from the site.
This obviously doesn't sit well with the folks at Sheri's Ranch, a brothel in Nevada.
In a blog post on the company's site, it cuts LinkedIn down to size for the ban.
Here's the most succinct part of the post:
"Legal prostitutes in Nevada are licensed and recognized by their county of employ as independent, taxpaying businesswomen. Nevada brothels are also licensed and recognized business establishments. These are legal businesses in reality, so why shouldn't they have a presence in virtual reality?"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I just don't get why hookers would want to sully their reputations by associating with spammers.
-jcr
Why is this even an article? LinkedIn can conduct business however it wants. If it wants to deny a certain group from conducting business with them then they are free to do so.
This is an article? Sure LinkedIn can conduct business with whoever. And Reason can criticize.