Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Idaho Medical Marijuana Advocate Lindsey Rinehart Got Her Kids Back From the State

"OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!!!!"

Mike Riggs | 5.13.2013 3:32 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Facebook

"OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!!!! OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!! OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!"

Lindsey Rinehart shared that message with Facebook friends on Friday. It was long overdue.

On April 23rd, the Boise-based medical marijuana advocate (and user--Rinehart has multiple sclerosis) had her kids put in foster care when Boise police searched Rinehart's home and found marijuana "in locations…accessible to the children"; the freezer and the bedroom Lindsey shared with husband Josh. 

Rinehart wasn't home that day. She, Josh, and their friend Sarah Caldwell had been on a hiking trip. Their sons and Caldwell's sons--ranging in age from 5 to 11--stayed at the Rinehart home with a babysitter.

The same day all three parents were slated to return from their hike, Boise police received a report from a local school that a friend of the Rineharts' oldest son had swallowed marijuana and become ill. The marijuana allegedly came from the Rineharts house. Police showed up to investigate, found the pot, and called Idaho Health and Welfare, which placed all four children in foster care. 

While Caldwell got her sons back just a few days later, the Rineharts spent a torturous two and a half weeks separated from Elijah, 5, and Laustin, 10. A week after their kids had been taken, Lindsey and Josh were allowed a single supervised visit. Then they were allowed to have the kids at home between the time they got out of school and 6 p.m., when they were returned to foster care. During those few weeks, Rinehart stopped treating her M.S. with medical marijuana. Early last week Rinehart announced she was willing to suffer "muscle spasms and 'sagging' around [the] right side of [her] mouth," if it meant getting the kids back. Friday, her boys came home. 

"ORDER TO VACATE!!! OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!!!! OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!!! OUR BOYS ARE HOME!!! CASE DISMISSED!!!!!" Rinehart posted on Facebook. She's been deprived of a familiar and effective treatment for her M.S., and may still face criminal charges, but for the moment, her family's together. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gosnell Found Guilty of First Degree Murder

Mike Riggs is a contributing editor at Reason.

Civil LibertiesWar on DrugsNanny StateMedical MarijuanaParenting
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Matrix   12 years ago

    God bless CPS for helping get this drug crazed fiend off the devil's weed!

  2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Finally.

  3. Dweebston   12 years ago

    Even a happy resolution to this sordid story feels like a nut punch.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Yeah. I'm glad these people have their children, whom they obviously love very much, back in their home. The rest of it makes me want to firebomb the local police station.

    2. Episiarch   12 years ago

      The fact that they had to essentially beg for their children back is just repulsive.

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        That and the fact that anyone earnestly championing the state over this couple must suspend any indulgence of compassion or empathy to embrace the schadenfreude in seeing enemy combatants stripped of their children. I want to believe episodes like this rock the prohibitionist mindset, but I suspect that most drug warriors believe these two had it coming for questioning the status quo.

        1. HazelMeade   12 years ago

          Yeah, I honestly can't comprehend how stories like this don't make national news.

          What kind of heartless piece of shit do you have to be to not care if people are having their children unjustly taken away?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    SOFT. ON. CRIME.

  5. Jack the Reaper   12 years ago

    Very happy the kids are back home with their parents where they belong. It was probably very traumatic for them to have to spend 2.5 weeks with strangers and to be interrogated by the state.

    Fuck CPS...

  6. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    She's been deprived of a familiar and effective treatment for her M.S., and may still face criminal charges, but for the moment, her family's together.

    So things are still pretty shitty then.

    1. Some call me Tim?   12 years ago

      When this was first reported I thought we decided that there was a good chance the search wasn't legal and that the criminal charges would eventually be thrown out.

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        During those few weeks, Rinehart stopped treating her M.S. with medical marijuana. Early last week Rinehart announced she was willing to suffer "muscle spasms and 'sagging' around [the] right side of [her] mouth," if it meant getting the kids back. Friday, her boys came home.

        My heart broke when I read this. That's a mother who loves her children and all because the fuckers at CPS and the police are now watching her and her husband for any illegal activity that would allow them to charge them again.

  7. Raston Bot   12 years ago

    pack shit/leave Idaho

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      *** crosses Idaho of list of "hopefuls" *** 8-(

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        *off*

    2. Loki   12 years ago

      pack shit/leave Idaho

      Move to CO or WA.

      1. deified   12 years ago

        Even Oregon or CA or New Mexico would be fine. The states to watch out for are ID, Utah (duh!), and Arizona. I'm a little unsure about Nevada but I believe they're MMJ.

    3. Aloysious   12 years ago

      Idaho is great; if you can tolerate blue laws, a population heavy on religious fundamentalism, and an income tax.

      On the plus side, we don't [yet] have helmet laws...

  8. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

    She's been deprived of a familiar and effective treatment for her M.S.

    The system worked.

  9. HazelMeade   12 years ago

    Thanks for the update. Good to hear they got their kids back.

    I look forward to hearing what happens with the Hakkens case. maybe something will come out that will prove the Hakkens really were complete nutjobs planning some sort of group suicide. But maybe they were just a normal couple who were caught smoking weed by the wrong cop, had the wrong judge reviewing their case, and were traumatized enough by losing their kids to do anything to get them back.

    If so, I'd hate to see their story get swpt under the rug.

  10. WomSom   12 years ago

    This makes a lot of sense dude.

    http://www.Secure-Web.tk

  11. Malcolm Kyle   12 years ago

    Prohibitionism is intensely, rabidly, frantically, frenetically, hysterically anti-freedom.

    An important feature of prohibitionism (which it closely shares with fascism) is totalitarianism. That means:
    A police state apparatus; widespread surveillance, arbitrary imprisonment or even murder of political opponents, mass-incarceration, torture, etc.

    Like despicable, playground bullies, prohibitionists are vicious one moment, then full of self-pity the next. They whine and whinge like lying, spoilt brats, claiming they just want to "save the little children", but the moment they feel it safe to do so, they used brute force and savage brutality against those they claim to be defending.

    Prohibitionists actually believe that they can transcend human nature and produce a better world. They allow only one doctrine, an impossible-to-obtain drug-free world. All forms of dissent, be they common-sense, scientific, constitutional, or democratic, are simply ignored, and their proponents vehemently persecuted.

    During alcohol prohibition (1919-1933), all profits went to enrich thugs and criminals. While battling over turf, young men died every day on inner-city streets. A fortune was wasted on enforcement that could have been far more wisely allocated. On top of the budget-busting prosecution and incarceration costs, billions in taxes were lost. Finally, in 1929, the economy collapsed. Does that sound familiar?

    1. Old Hippie Ent   12 years ago

      Amazing. I was quick-scrolling down the comments, read this one, and said to myself, "Wow, this guy has so many rational facts, he sounds like Malcolm Kyle"!

      You're awesome, friend. Thanks for being you! Nugs and hugs!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!