Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

President Obama to Appoint Twitter's Legal Director as White House Chief Privacy Officer

Ed Krayewski | 5.8.2013 11:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | White House
(White House)

privacy?
Reason 24/7

Another advisor/czar will join the Obama White House, this time in the newly created position of "chief privacy officer."

From CNET:

President Obama has picked Nicole Wong, Twitter's legal director, to be the White House's first chief privacy officer, CNET has learned.

Wong previously was a vice president and deputy general counsel at Google at its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, where she managed a team of lawyers that worked with the company's engineers to review products before they launched. The reviews included privacy, copyright, and removal requests, which earned her a nickname of "The Decider" -- as recounted in a 2008 New York Times Magazine article.

CNET reports Wong will actually be a senior adviser to the White House's "Chief Technology Officer," who is, presumably, an advisor to the president.

Follow these stories and more at Reason 24/7 and don't forget you can e-mail stories to us at 24_7@reason.com and tweet us at @reason247.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: As I Lay Dying Singer Arrested for Alleged Murder for Hire Plot

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsScience & TechnologyNanny StatePrivacyBarack ObamaWhite House
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

    Was this supposed to be on H&R?

    1. #HOLO YOLO   12 years ago

      Magic!

  2. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Chief Privacy Circumvention Officer

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      I was thinking, "Why does the Administration need to be even MORE private...I thought it was a 'public' office?"

      I guess they're looking at the position differently than I.

      1. Geoff Nathan   12 years ago

        Actually, Chief Privacy Officers are in charge of making sure that customers' data is kept private once it's been provided to the website in question.

        And I'm sure the federal government is very good at keeping our data private.

        Or it isn't...

        I feel the need of a super-sarcastic emoticon, but don't know of any.

        1. Live Free or Diet   12 years ago

          We're "customers" of the government? Where do I cancel my subscription?

          1. Scarecrow Repair   12 years ago

            Life member. Non-un-renewable.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    We can look forward to her frustrated announcement that she's stepping down to spend more time with the family.

    1. Brandon   12 years ago

      She's going to take the blame for Benghazi.

  4. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    They've had positions like that before. Peter Swire was Chief Counselor for Privacy at the OMB and was supposed to have global oversight for privacy, and that was back during the Clinton years.

  5. db   12 years ago

    The "Ministry of Privacy" is guaranteed to be devoted to finding legal ways to destroy the concept of privacy.

    If you really believe in a human right, you don't create a government agency to regulate it. You prosecute people and agencies for violating it. Period.

    1. kibby   12 years ago

      A thousand times this.

  6. Episiarch   12 years ago

    Ah yes, Twitter, the great Facebook level success story that went public ...oh wait. That's the Obama administration: making sure competence is their number one priority.

  7. Ranter   12 years ago

    Wait, they must be paying her PEANUTS, because of the horrible amount of budget cutbacks due to the Ssssssequestration, right?!?!?

    So basically, they're just adding another meaningless manager into their organizational structure, who probably won't do a goddamn thing. But it's one more thing to impart the appearance that they give a shit and are being 'open & transparent'...

  8. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    If she's Wong, I don't wanna be right...hubba hubba!

    http://bit.ly/12ee1eb

  9. SeaCaptain(Yokeltarian)   12 years ago

    "The Decider"

    I read that as "The Derider"

    1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      You spelled "The Derp-rider" wrong.

  10. Agammamon   12 years ago

    Why would you pick someone from a company whose entire reason for existence is servicing people who can't keep anything to themselves.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests

Autumn Billings | 6.19.2025 5:30 PM

ICE Insists That Congress Needs Its Permission To Conduct Oversight

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2025 4:45 PM

We're 8 Years Away From an Automatic 23 Percent Cut in Social Security Payouts

Jack Nicastro | 6.19.2025 4:30 PM

Texas Legislators Say They Are Protecting Free Speech on Campus by Banning 'Expressive Activities' at Night

Jacob Sullum | 6.19.2025 3:20 PM

Los Angeles Is Beating Trump by Not Punching Back: Dispatch from L.A.

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.19.2025 3:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!