Some California Teachers Suing over Politicized Union Dues Spending

California's Proposition 32, which would have blocked companies and unions from automatically deducting money from employees to use to fund campaigns or candidates, died at the polls in November. As Reason's Jesse Walker once argued, there are serious civil liberties issues with getting the government involved (well, more involved) in what should be a private relationship between employers and employees. If union members don't want their dues to be used on certain political campaigns, it's up to them to fight for change.
Now a small group of teachers in California are doing exactly that. They want out. The Associated Press reports:
Ten California schoolteachers filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the politically powerful California Teachers Association to escape paying union fees that they claim violate their free-speech rights.
The teachers — represented by the conservative Center for Individual Rights — are taking aim at laws that allow unions to collect certain fees from workers who don't want to join. The lawsuit argues that the fees end up supporting union lobbying and political activity, not contract negotiations as intended.
A CTA spokesman responded apparently unironically that the lawsuit was an attempt to dilute workers' rights.
Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.
Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The law-talking guy's statement from the full AP article sez:
Which means that it could just as easily be a freedom of association case as a free speech case.
"Forcing educators to financially support causes that run contrary to their political and policy beliefs violates their First Amendment rights is exactly the point,"
It's like you want this thing dead or something. Freedom of speech cases still hold some currency.
You can throw both arguments at the court and see what sticks.
"A CTA spokesman responded apparently unironically that the lawsuit was an attempt to dilute workers' rights."
These people 'educate' the kids? Is the "up = down" lesson covered in the first grade?
I think a video I saw on Reason, of a California teachers union group holding a city council meeting hostage, was the last nail in my interest in becoming a teacher.
The workers' rights are not the same as the worker's rights. Power to the apostrophe!
If you oppose the demands of the Worker's Party, you oppose the workers.
Don't you know that?
lol, in come the bottom feeding, blood sucking attorneys lol
http://www.GoGetAnon.tk
Fuck. Skynet just became self-aware.
@Sevo Exactly!
The CTA spokesman makes a great case for extending the North Carolina law...
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07.....jobs-north