More Than 50 Dead So Far in Run Up to Pakistani Elections
Scheduled for May 11


Pakistan is holding parliamentary elections to elect a new government on May 11. The election represents the first successful transition of civilian governments; no Pakistani government had previously completed a full five year term. The Pakistani Taliban is targeting the elections in a bloody campaign that has killed more than 50 people in the last two and a half weeks; at least 20 in the last three days alone. Pakistan's political parties say they're undeterred. Via Al-Jazeera:
Speaking at a joint press conference in Karachi on Monday, leaders from the Pakistan People's Party, Muttahida Qaumi Movement and Awami National Party (ANP) said bomb attacks would not keep them from engaging in the May 11 polls.
Bashir Jan, secretary general of the ANP, referred to the 2012 assassination of Bashir Bilour, former party leader, saying his party had made sacrifices in the past.
Jan's statement came after three children were wounded in an explosion near the election office of Mohammad Ahmed Khan, the ANP candidate from Charsadda, a district of Pakhtunkhwa province.
Al Jazeera's Imran Khan, reporting from Islamabad, said the ANP was likely targeted for its stance on the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
The ANP, said our correspondent, has taken a strong stance against the Pakistani Taliban, an act which is "unusual" for political parties in the South Asian nation.
In addition to domestic terrorism, another issue emerging on the campaign trail is the U.S. drone war, harder to ignore in the country its being perpetrated in than in the country that perpetrates it. Opposition to the drone war is led by the political party of Imran Khan, a former cricketer and prominent anti-drone activist, who's said he was detained and questioned by U.S. authorities over his views on drone strikes while trying to attend a fundraiser in the country in October. You can watch a report by Al-Jazeera's Imran Khan (no relation) on the drone issue in the Pakistani elections here.
The PPP, the party of current Pakistani president Asif Zardari, is ahead in some polls. It's led by the 24-year old Bilawal Zardari, the only son of Zardari and Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated in 2007 and whose father founded the party. Other polls show a lead held by the PML (N) of Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted as prime minister in 1998 by General Pervez Musharraf. Musharraf returned to the country to try to stand in the election but was charged in relation to the assassination of Bhutto instead.
Meanwhile, amid souring relations, the U.S. has suspended military aid ($800 million worth) to Pakistan. Pakistan's generals responded this weekend saying they didn't need it. Civilian aid, however, totaling about $1.5 billion a year, continues.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ban elections.
Ban bans.
What they do!
They smile in your face,
All the time they want to take your place,
The Pakistanis.
/O'Jays
Ban the banning of bans.
And I say your three level ban-ban-ban doesn't go too far enough.
elect bam-bam
this could be his campaign song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcaPu9JPenU
Is there any way to blame the US for this one?
If not, is there at least some way to make this into a list of reasons to intervene in Central Asia?
If not, then how will I be able to fit this event into the framework of the US as hyperpowerful Lord of the Cosmos?
There's always way to blame the U.S. for everything bad in the world. That's not the question. The more topical question is, how do we blame Bush?
Damn, you're right! I blame Bush for my lapse in knowing how to frame the question, naturally.
Damn NCLB.
50 dead? And we thought the Republican presidential primary debates were brutal.
50 dead? That's nothing! Um, we are talking about voters, right? /Chicago poll worker
It just so happens that your friends there are only mostly dead. There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive. With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do... register them as Democrats.
So, kind of like Chicago.
Pakistan has had elections every couple of years since the '80s, and they're next door to India, the worlds most populous Democratic country. India's had a democracy, albeit a deeply flawed and corrupt one, since 1950.
You really do love to talk about things you know nothing about, huh?
he knows a lot about our Great American Culture, and how like, Mexicans... something, something, something, dystopia.
this is the guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGxpdP3ZbWQ