U.K. Official Insists Press Regulation Doesn't Threaten Human Rights
And don't you report otherwise
Maria Miller, the culture secretary, has insisted that controversial draft legislation to allow courts to impose exemplary damages on newspapers who lose libel cases do not breach human rights laws, and marks an "improvement" in press regulation.
The proposal to introduce exemplary damages remains arguably the biggest stumbling block for the government in gaining the backing of the newspaper industry for its plan to introduce press reforms prompted by Lord Justice Leveson's report.
Labour MP Paul Farrelly, a member of the Commons culture, media and sport select committee that quizzed Miller on Tuesday, asked if she was sure the examplary damages proposal was "legally watertight".
Farrelly said the press industry called in lawyers to give a legal opinion which warned that the exemplary damages proposal breached Article 10 of the European convention on human rights, which protects freedom of expression.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?