Minnesota's Aggressive Bar Tax Audits Face Court Challenge
Tax collectors pull numbers out of their asses and tell bars to pay up
The case and wider controversy come down to whether the state should audit a business's books or booze.
Department of Revenue procedures call for auditors to focus first on a bar's point-of-sale and related records if reliable. But critics claim investigators too easily default to so-called indirect markup audits that reconstruct hypothetical sales figures based on estimates of drinks poured from a bottle or keg and stock purchased from distributors, often leading to excessive back tax bills. The variables can include everything from happy hours to how strong bartenders pour drinks to breakage, spillage, tip jars and even extra shots on the side.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?