No Notice
Stealth regulations
New federal regulations generally are supposed to go through a "notice and comment" period that allows affected parties and the public to give agencies feedback. But that requirement has loopholes, as the Government Accountability Office explains in a December report.
The biggest loophole is the "good cause exemption," which allows agencies to determine, without oversight, when it would be impractical or harmful to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). From 2003 through 2010, the GAO found, "agencies published about 35 percent of major rules [which have an annual economic impact of $100 million or more] and about 44 percent of nonmajor rules without an NPRM."
During the Obama administration, the report notes, federal agencies have become even less accountable. "From 2008 to 2009," the GAO says, "the percentage of major rules without an NPRM increased from 26 percent to 40 percent. Agencies issued the largest numbers of major rules without an NPRM in 2009 and 2010 (34 in each year)."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
ederal agencies have become even less accountable. "From 2008 to 2009," the GAO says,
agencies have become even less accountable. "From 2008 to 2009," the GAO says