Kurt Loder Movie Reviews

Olympus Has Fallen and Admission

Gerard Butler battles North Korean invaders, Tina Fey takes on Princeton.


When last seen on Hollywood soil, in the 2012 Red Dawn remake, evil North Korean invaders had touched down in Spokane, Washington, where they were quickly butt-kicked by a bunch of teenagers. Having learned nothing from that experience, the Norks are now back, and in Olympus Has Fallen, they've targeted the White House, into which they manage to blast their way in just 13 minutes. Clearly, this sequester thing is having a more serious effect on national security than anyone could have expected.

Director Antoine Fuqua, who made the steely Training Day a dozen years ago, here delivers a movie that traffics in the most shameless patriot-baiting readymades (a sad bugle sounding, a bullet-riddled Old Glory rustling limply in the breeze) while attempting to yank cheers with a succession of bad-guy mowdowns (there are more headshots in this picture than might be found at a SAG board meeting).

For a piece of elevator-pitch action fodder like this, the cast is unusually heavy with stars: Aaron Eckhart, Morgan Freeman, Melissa Leo. But none of these actors are given a lot to do. (Eckhart spends most of the movie in handcuffs, Leo gets kicked around a little bit, and Freeman looks very concerned and calls for coffee.) The film's focus is almost entirely on Gerard Butler, who is also one of its 14 producers, and who may be hoping to obliterate all memories of his last performance, playing a leprechaun in the universally reviled Movie 43.

Butler is actually a solid action man, though. He plays Mike Banning, a former Secret Service officer who was unjustly bounced off the presidential security detail after a nasty limo accident and now labors unhappily in the Treasury Department. When a plane full of North Koreans comes barreling into D.C. airspace (with surprising ease) and starts strafing the streets of the Capitol—and blowing off the top of the Washington Monument, the bastards—Banning immediately makes his way to the White House, which he finds under assault by a Nork assault team. He manages to cap a number of these assailants, but fails to stop them from machine-gunning their way into the building. Soon their leader—a hissable character named Kang (Rick Yune)—has some high-profile hostages to play with: President Benjamin Asher (Eckhart) and his VP (Phil Austin) and Secretary of Defense (Leo). On a TV feed to the Pentagon, Kang demands the computer codes for every nuke-equipped ICBM in the US arsenal. This can't be good. (Kang turns out to be an international terrorist, not an official emissary of the North Korean government…although he's based in North Korea, and…whatever.)

With the president and vice president both indisposed, the Speaker of the House (Freeman) is brought in, as constitutionally mandated, to act as president. He is, as I say, very concerned. Fortunately, Banning has managed to slip into the White House (with surprising ease) and has begun greasing Norks left and right. He continues to do so, and do so, and do so, until there's just one bad man left lurking—the hateful Kang.

There's not much more to the movie than Banning's lethal progression through the halls and even the hollow walls of the White House, blowing the face off every North Korean he encounters. At the screening I attended, this rousing slaughter had its intended effect on a sizeable number of people, who erupted in applause every time a bad guy went flying away in a haze of blood. These particular invaders are admittedly pretty hard to mourn, though.

More dismaying is the primitive quality of the digital effects in this movie. Some of the explosions and fires and plane crashes on view are rendered at a level just a few steps above the White House attack video posted by the real-world Norks on YouTube earlier this week. (Talk about useful idiots—have these people never heard of pre-release publicity?) This sub-par CGI was concocted by effects houses in Bulgaria, Denmark, and China. Under-employed Hollywood VFX artists are understandably up in arms about this sort of outsourcing. And while it might make sense in a bean-counting way, do we really need to see the beans being counted onscreen?       


Admission is a smarter movie than the average romantic comedy, and while chugging along on the way to its inexorable happy wrapup, it passes through some interesting social territory, touching on issues of parenting, academic priorities, and professional ethics. It's also very funny in parts, with bright performances by Tina Fey and Lily Tomlin. But the comedy and the social observation don't quite meld—you want a little more of either one or the other—and when the movie's over, you're left feeling somewhat under-gratified.

The picture was directed by Paul Weitz (Little Fockers) and adapted—not slavishly, I gather—from a novel by Jean Hanff Korelitz. Fey plays Portia Nathan, an admissions officer at Princeton University. (Parts of the film were shot on-campus, and there's a weird suggestion that Princeton is the only school in the country worth getting into.) Portia's boss, Clarence (Wallace Shawn), the Dean of Admissions, lectures his subordinates about the need to look beyond mere academic excellence in assessing Princeton applicants: sports are important, mixed ethnic heritage is always good, and a disabled parent can be a plus, too. (Since author Korelitz is married to a Princeton professor, these calculations have a ping of accuracy.)

Portia makes an annual round of high schools to address potential Princeton applicants. She's glib ("Just be yourself") and candid (noting that of the 20,000 students who apply to her school each year, 99 per cent won't be accepted). One of her stops this year is an "alternative" school called New Quest, located in rural New Hampshire, where students are instructed not only in academic subjects, but also such crunchy extra-curricular activities as wood-chopping and animal husbandry. The school is run by John Pressman (Paul Rudd), a barely remembered acquaintence from Portia's own student days at Dartmouth. John recommends to her a student named Jeremiah (Nat Wolff), whose grades are abysmal but who is nevertheless a brilliant autodidact. In addition, Paul has learned that Jeremiah was adopted as a baby—and that he was born on the same day and in the same area that the younger Portia (as her roommate told him at the time) quietly gave birth to a male child and then put him up for adoption. Portia initially resists the implication that Jeremiah is her now-grown son, but soon begins to wonder—and eventually undertakes a highly inadvisable series of measures to assure his admission to Princeton.

Effectively complicating the plot is a Princeton professor named Mark (Martin Sheen), with whom Portia has lived happily for 10 years. When he takes up with another woman, Portia feels sandbagged. (Clingy emotion isn't Fey's strong suit, but she makes it both funny and revealing.) There's also another admissions officer (Gloria Reuben), who's competing with Portia to replace the retiring Clarence. And then there's Portia's mother, Susannah (Tomlin), a fire-breathing '70s feminist who says she fulfilled society's expectation that she have children by copulating with a stranger on a train, Portia being the result. Susannah is a monster of self-sufficiency, and Tomlin is unsparingly abrasive in the role; but she manages to mine laughs from this woman's every chilly wisecrack and withering glance.

It's too bad that the movie is so seriously handicapped by the character of John, who we realize from the outset is Portia's designated squeeze-to-be. Turning away from his wealthy background, John has traveled the world doing nothing but good works in places like Myanmar and Outer Mongolia. He has even adopted an African child, a long-suffering boy named Nelson (Travaris Spears), who's tired of his father's globe-trotting and wants them to settle into a permanent home. John is perfect in just about every way—warm, handsome, selflessly idealistic—and if he were played by anyone other than the unconquerably appealing Paul Rudd, he could easily be insufferable. He's pretty hard to accept as it is.

Tomlin is something to see, though, and Fey once again excels at portraying a modern woman beset by very modern struggles and expectations. But the movie's attempted blend of serious subjects with spirited comedy doesn't really hold together. Admission does have quite a bit to recommend it. If only there were a little more.   

NEXT: Fox News Poll Shows 49 Percent Support Gay Marriage

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I liked Olympus Has Fallen better the first time I saw it, when it was that season of 24 where Jack Bauer had to defend Lady President from a home invasion.

    1. That’s exactly what I told my wife.

      1. It’s a straight ripoff of the Vince Flynn book where terrorists take over the White House.

    2. Was that the same season where the bad guys got into the White House through a little known waterway running directly under it? That has to be one of the all-time mostly awesomely stupid (and therefore wonderful) concepts ever.


  2. If terrorists kidnap the president and VP, and threaten to kill them unless you give them the launch codes, there’s really only one solution: hand over the speaker of the House and stop answering the phone.

    1. Yeah, I don’t think I could root for somebody trying to defend the upper echelons of the U.S. government anymore.

    2. lulz – exactly my traitorous thoughts.

    3. Imagine somebody threatening Boner with killing Biden and Obama? By the third call, he would be screaming “Do it already”!

      Wasn’t that the plot of “Ruthless People”?

      1. It was, indeed. A very funny movie.

    4. You missed throwing in Patrick Leahy and John Kerry.

      I forget who’s next after that.

      1. After Boner comes the Cabinet. I forget the sequence.

      2. I don’t care who’s next. Give them Schumer, too

  3. And by Norks, we really mean Chinese, amirite?

  4. All Loder reviews should come with a WARNING: CONTAINS SPOILERS line at the top.

    1. I know. He totally ruined the suspense in Prometheus by revealing that the Manly Yet Troubled protagonist kills all the Yellow Perillers in order of seniority, with a climactic Boss Fight at the end.

      1. You’ve also summarized the spinoff video game.

      2. There was suspense? Every movie in the genre has that plot.

  5. I could swear I heard Laurence O’Donnell’s voice in the Olympus trailers, so no thanks. I really hate it when Hollywood uses real politicians and real TV talking heads.

    1. Even worse, progressive future Senator Ashley Judd is in it!

      1. if Laurence O’Donnell isn’t cheering the communist takeover of the white president White House as wicked awesome, how am I supposed to suspend disbelief?

  6. See I never even thought about it liek that before.


  7. I find the whole “OMG The President has been taken hostage” movie category nauseating.

    Hollywood really buys into the ‘God Emperor’ concept of the Presidency.

    1. It’s an entire industry where celebrity is the currency of success. Why wouldn’t they buy into the God-Emperor concept?

    2. My thoughts exactly. If D.C. and the vermin that infest it were vaporized tomorrow, the rest of the country would hardly notice. Not much would change other than the country becoming exponentially freer. And richer.

      1. Losing the likes of Paul, Amash and Massie would be pretty sad though. Blood of patriots, I suppose.

  8. If you think Julie`s story is cool…, last week my cousins step dad got a cheque for $9876 working eighteen hours a week an their house and the’re neighbor’s aunt`s neighbour has done this for 10-months and recieved a check for over $9876 in their spare time at their labtop. the tips from this address, http://www.wow92.com

  9. Upon freeing the deified Obozo from the clutches of the 1% libertarians, he decreed a grant from Bernankicus of sixteen susterces, and a glorious bounty of pistol bullets were rendered unto the people’s state.

    “Olympus” is buying 9mm and .40 cal by the train load lolzozloalzlz

  10. like Mike implied I cannot believe that any body able to make $4486 in one month on the internet. did you read this web site

  11. If you think Victoria`s story is flabbergasting,, 3 weaks-ago my friend made $4441 putting in a ninteen hour week an their house and they’re roomate’s ex-wife`s neighbour has done this for nine months and earned more than $4441 in their spare time from a computer. the guidelines available at this link, http://www.fly38.com

  12. last week my cousins step dad got a cheque for $9876

    able to make $4486 in one month on the internet.

    done this for nine months and earned more than $4441 in their spare time

    Wow92 is clearly the best deal so far. Is there another bid?

  13. up to I saw the check 4 $5133, I did not believe that my neighbour was actually taking home money part time on their laptop.. there mums best friend haz done this 4 less than thirteen months and recently paid for the depts on there place and got a brand new Ford. read more at,

  14. my neighbor’s aunt makes $87 every hour on the computer. She has been without work for eight months but last month her pay was $13473 just working on the computer for a few hours. Go to this web site and read more http://www.wow92.com

  15. up to I saw the draft of $7893, I did not believe that…my… neighbour could realey making money in their spare time from there labtop.. there sisters roommate haz done this for under six months and just now paid the dept on there house and bought a new Ford. we looked here, http://www.wow92.com

  16. I’m creating over $7k a month operating half time. I unbroken hearing others tell Pine Tree State what quantity cash they will build on-line therefore i made a decision to seem into it. Well, it absolutely was all true and has whole modified my life. this is often what I do, http://www.hdcash1.com

  17. Kendall. true that Don`s rep0rt is impossible… on monday I bought a top of the range Lancia since I been earnin $7748 this last month and-more than, 10k last month. it’s certainly the best job Ive ever done. I began this 3 months ago and right away was bringing in more than $76… per/hr. I follow the details on this straightforward website, http://www.fly38.com

  18. upto I saw the draft four $7797, I didn’t believe that my neighbour woz like actualey taking home money parttime on their laptop.. there aunts neighbour has done this less than fifteen months and resently repaid the mortgage on their appartment and purchased a great new Dodge. this is where I wenthttp://googlejobs.com.qr.net/kgzE

  19. The film’s focus is almost entirely on Gerard Butler, who is

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.