British Historian Says the Way Paul Krugman Debates Could Reveal Something About His Past
Niall Ferguson suspects childhood trauma may account for the Nobel laureate's debating style
Paul Krugman has been charging hard of late at people he believes espouse particularly dangerous economic recipes.
It's elicited some equal and opposite responses.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Naah.
He’s just an idiot.
Niall Ferguson response to Paul Krugman’s “incivility” was but a handful of petty swipes and unsupportable attacks on his character. In doing so, Ferguson demeans himself.
“It is a pity that a once talented scholar should demean himself in this way.”
Indeed.
Matthew 7:3.