Republicans Delay Chuck Hagel, John Brennan Votes, Because of Libya, Drones, and Financial Disclosures
Votes won't happen until after next week's recess

Republicans succeeding in filibustering Chuck Hagel's confirmation vote to Secretary of Defense this week. Only 4 Republicans crossing over to vote for cloture on Hagel--Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, Maine's Susan Collins, Mississippi's Thad Cochran, and Nebraska's Mike Johanns—leaving Democrats two short of the magic 60 needed to break the filibuster. By contrast, John Kerry was confirmed in a 94-3 vote, with only James Inhofe, John Cornyn, and Ted Cruz voting against him.
Nevertheless, Democrats are confident Hagel will be confirmed in a vote later this month. For their part, Some Republicans say they are holding up the Hagel vote (like the Brennan vote) to get more details about Benghazi. It wasn't done, however, for John Kerry, who was confirmed to lead the department most of the rest of the executive branch blames for the security failure in Benghazi. Rand Paul tried to explain in a statement:
"I tend to believe that the President should be entitled to some leeway on his nominees. That is why I voted in favor of Sen. John Kerry, with whom I largely disagree on foreign policy, to serve as Secretary of State. However, I also believe there are standards in both policy and background that go beyond mere disagreement and go to the suitability of the nominee to perform their job… That is why I have placed a hold on the nomination of John Brennan to serve as director of the CIA until he answers the question of whether or not the President can kill American citizens through the drone strike program on U.S. soil."
"That is also why I voted to not end debate on the Hagel nomination. I do not believe Sen. Hagel has adequately explained his activities and their financing since he left the Senate, and I believe this criteria is especially important when dealing with the revolving door between government and the private sector."
Republicans want Hagel to release five years of financial disclosures (who's paid him and why), which Democrats say is three years more than required by law. As for John Brennan, Glenn Greenwald pointed out last month the disparity between how unfeasible Brennan's nomination to head the CIA in 2008 was compared to his nomination this time around.
The votes on Hagel and Brennan now won't take place until after the Senate's recess next week.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why not skip the vote and do a recess appointment?
It's not like that stanky old Constitution thingy matters anymore.
I must have missed the "every vote in the Senate requires a supermajority" clause.
yeah, damn that Senate and its pesky rules. Good thing Dems would never hold up an appointment by a Repub for any reason.
Arise Sir Loin Of Beef!
I must have missed the "every vote in the Senate requires a simple majority" clause.
But let's not fall all over ourselves defending Republicans and their political games.
Take that straw man! And that! That too! You're going down straw man! Take that!
Not just a straw man, but a goalposts shift. Almost an impressive move.
There is no evidence anywhere, not in the constitution, not in the Federalist Papers, not anywhere, to suggest that the normal operating procedure for the Senate was anything other than to require simple majority votes for most matters.
It was predicted, in fact, that requiring supermajorities would hobble Congress. Lo and behold. It's nothing to defend.
Goalposts are moved, straw man is on fire, Tony has Tulpafied the thread!
Woo hoo!
But there is ample evidence that the Senate was expected to make (and then follow) its own rules.
Hobbling Congress is a good thing when it comes to preventing the tyranny of the majority.
I'm too lazy to go searching, but I kind of doubt TEAM BLUE was in here crying about supermajorities when Dems were blocking Bush appointments.
If I'm wrong, I'm sure TEAM BLUE could provide links. I will happily admit I was wrong.
If such behavior was kept as rare as it was back then, we wouldn't have a problem. I don't get it. If you're not for any TEAM then you should at most be neutral on this issue.
The Republicans need to come out and say they have evidence, which they won't reveal, that Hagel is a felon who took advantage of the tax amnesty a few years ago.
"Arise Sir Loin of Beef!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qtgm5g5Gyo
I don't know what explains this sudden, albeit minor, shift in spine levels of the supposed opposition. One of them must have just dropped their balls and it threw off the average. I'm sure they'll be snipped and placed in the lockbox shortly.
I don't know if there's a grading scale for spine, but they were at the absolute zero point (without changing parties).
So now they've crept up like what, one degree?
They're still below the cosmic spine background level. A feat that is both impressive and damning.
In other words, Hillary is an incompetent twit entangled with the Muslim Brotherhood and they preferred to have her ass gone ASAP. The other departments are being ran by individuals who are not any worse than their successors.
Not to worry. As soon as the current vacation is over, they'll vote him through. McCain and Graham have said as much.
Several Republicans, including John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, said Thursday afternoon on the Senate floor that while they would vote against cloture this week, they would be willing to allow the nomination to move forward when Congress returns after recess.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/r.....?pos=oplyh
So, its all just theater. Nothing to see here.
Any time those three get together to do something, it's going to suck for everyone else.
Those two you can always count on to wear the big girl panties, crotchless that is, and roll over for the democrats to do 'em up the ass. Some one has to be the 'adult' in Washington.
Shit, Lamar is so fucking bland, I didn't even notice him there.
Congress is almost totally useless.
Maine's Susan Collins
Imagine my surprise.
Any relation to Maine's Barnabus Collins?
Is there any place that has congrescritters ranked by "Yea" percentages? Because I think she votes yes on anything.
She does vote on everything. Two-term Collins (She originally ran on the promise that she'd quit after two terms. She's serving her third.) has never missed a vote. Ever.
She does occasionally vote no.
Yeah, but I mean on stuff other than "All Bills Must Cite Their Constitutional Authority" or "Government Can't Get Your Shit Without A Warrant".
including John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, said Thursday afternoon on the Senate floor that while they would vote against cloture this week, they would be willing to allow the nomination to move forward when Congress returns after recess.
"I'll never let you put it in there! Not 'til you buy me something pretty, anyway."
Congress is almost totally useless.
We could use them for chum, I suppose.
I'd be all for that, except that we need them to stop being useless. Otherwise, there is no check on the Reichskanzler's authority.
It seems our more fervent anti-war friends and paleo-cons are taking this news a little hard: http://www.theamericanconserva.....y-damaged/
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02.....agel-vote/
"It's time for libertarians to treat Rand Paul like the turncoat he is: boycott. No $$, no support, & start calling him Paul the Lesser."
- Justin Raimondo
You'd think Hagel was the second coming of Robert Taft judging by this outrage.
*sigh*
He always gets it backwards. It's "win, then purge", not the other way around.
That is why I have placed a hold on the nomination of John Brennan to serve as director of the CIA until he answers the question of http://www.shoxinfr.com/nike-shox-r2-c-7.html whether or not the President can kill American citizens through the drone strike program on U.S. soil."