Obama's Spending and Revenue Plan Already Dead in the Water
You can't be serious, says the House
President Barack Obama's proposal to delay sequestration appeared dead on arrival in the House — even before he announced it.
"I'm flabbergasted," House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon told POLITICO ahead of the president's speech. "Until he addresses the real problem, which is mandatory spending, he's just whistling in the wind."
The president's proposal to put off mandatory spending cuts and push for more revenue through tax reform was the latest salvo in the never-ending fiscal battles, and Republicans have little appetite for any more revenue increases after the year-end tax-rate compromise. The across-the-board sequester cuts, which would reduce Pentagon spending by $487 billion over the next decade, were originally scheduled to go into effect on Jan. 2, but were delayed to March 1.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But 'the people' *luv* him even if their paychecks are taking a hit, right? That's what I read.
It is something like wait and watch situation, when something firm will come to people then things will be more clear that what will come to people hands.
Certified Financial Advisor