Growth Controls Fueled CA Housing Bubbles, Subsequent Fiscal Crisis
Restrictions artificially fueled soaring home values, tax revenue
It is not Proposition 13 or greedy bankers, but the many layers of growth control laws that are the main instigator of the prolongation of California's economic recession since 2007. And with the recession has come state and local government budget deficits, pending municipal bankruptcies, an un-closable funding gap in the state public pension system and misplaced calls to reform Prop. 13.
What makes up the popular image of California is not just its weather and beautiful natural resources but its real estate. It once used to be said, "You can't lose on California real estate because the prices only go up." And the reason that real estate values seemingly always went up was because of California's unique mix of population growth controls.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?