An achievement isn't great if the government has nothing to do with it. Government does big things. We mere private individuals do only small things. The bias toward government—a curious thing when you consider that its essence is the legal power to use physical force against peaceful individuals—couldn't be more stark. Yet what grounds are there for believing this? When people are left free to innovate and produce, writes Sheldon Richman, they routinely take risks to achieve things that are great in the sense that they make our lives better, healthier, and longer. Moreover, much of what makes life better is the cumulative effect of many "small" achievements, marginal improvements in products and services. Any one of them may be small, but the total effect on our lives is great. We'd be worse off without them.
Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.
Reason is supported by:
Robert A. Zadek
The officer turned his body camera off, but the incident was still recorded.
"I refuse to construct some kind of character who is going to appease everybody."
New York City, Which Defended Its Onerous Gun Transport Restrictions As Necessary for Public Safety, Concedes They Weren't
Several justices seem skeptical of the claim that revising the rules after SCOTUS agreed to consider a challenge to them made the case moot.
Plus: Twitter terms seem to permit "shadowbanning," the case for Craigslist sex ads, and more…