California Considers Gas Tax on Imports from Other States
Commerce Clause, anybody?
Not satisfied with a $60 billion new energy tax, disguised as a cap-and-trade auction and pegged to increase gasoline prices by 70 cents a gallon. Not satisfied with an untested "low-carbon" fuels regulation that will likely reduce refinery capacity in California (and we just saw how well that works out for California).
Now, the Air Resources Board is considering a new regulation creating a "border adjustment fee" on California fuels. This is an explicit acknowledgment that their regulatory actions will substantially increase the price of fuels, creating "leakage" of both jobs and GHG emissions to other states. So the Board's natural response is – no, not reducing the cost impact of their regulations – but attempting to increase the cost of competing fuel imports.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Awesome. By the time they're done, the only practical thing to do will be to wall the whole fucking state up and treat it as a massive asylum. We can use that as a trial run for turning Michigan into a prison.
I live in California. Being that I'm tied here with a fully paid for house, I'm unlikely to leave it. But every day, my co-worker's escape plan to Florida looks better.