Afghanistan

2,000 American Soldiers Dead in Afghanistan, We've Crossed This Milestone Before

The AP said the grim milestone was passed this weekend, but the New York Times said it was passed in August. 1,000 deaths have come in the last two years alone

|

at least obama cares

As noted on Reason 24/7, the AP reported the death of the 2,000th American service member in Afghanistan over the weekend, the result of a blue-on-green firefight—one of 52 U.S. and NATO troops killed by Afghan security forces so far this year. Reason 24/7 also noted back in August when the New York Times reported the 2000th American service member killed in Afghanistan. The Times noted then that though it took nine years for the U.S. to reach the grim 1,000 milestone, it took only twenty seven months to reach the second thousand. When the Times reported 2,000 dead, on August 21, iCasualties.org listed the total number of American dead at 2,102. The surge in casualties is attributed to the troop surge Obama ordered in 2009, one that did not appear to turn the tide in the nearly eleven year old war and that has left the situation in Afghanistan worse off than it was before the surge started.

The continued mismanagement of the war in Afghanistan is part of Obama's broader failing foreign policy, but remains a background (if even) issue in the 2012 election. Candidates trying to make  Afghanistan an issue aren't gaining much traction and Congress is now out until after election day, having not done much at all in regards to Afghanistan. Nevertheless, a Tampa Bay Times article about a local soldier, Staff Sergeant Matthew Sitton, killed in Afghanistan (which reports his August 2nd death as the 2,056th American soldier killed) reports his local congressman, Republican Bill Young, who got a letter from the soldier shortly before his death warning of the futility of the mission there, hopeful that stories of deaths like Sitton's will resonate and return questioning the wisdom of the Afghanistan war into the political conversation.  With less than 40 days left before the election, even as the presidential debates commission is losing sponsors over limiting participation to just Obama and Romney, Afghanistan remains unlikely to be seriously addressed.

Semi-related, Democrat Pete Stark lambasting George W. Bush on the House floor in 2007 for sending soldiers off to Iraq to "get their heads blown off for the president's amusement" and that the president "just likes to blow things up" in attacking his veto of SCHIP:

NEXT: Boy Scouts to Tell Police About Pedophiles in Records

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Nevertheless, a Tampa Bay Times article about a local soldier, Staff Sergeant Matthew Sitton, killed in Afghanistan (which reports his August 2nd death as the 2,056th American soldier killed) reports his local congressman, Republican Bill Young, who got a letter from the soldier shortly before his death warning of the futility of the mission there, hopeful that stories of deaths like Sitton’s will resonate and return the wisdom of the Afghanistan war into the political conversation.

    Huh?

    1. I left out questioning between return and the wisdom

      1. I’m not trying to be a pedant, but I still don’t follow. The whole sentence with all the clarifying bits removed is:

        [A] Tampa Bay Times article about a local soldier killed in Afghanistan reports his local congressman hopeful that stories of deaths like Sitton’s will resonate and return [questioning?] the wisdom of the Afghanistan war into the political conversation.

        It’s possible the fault is mine, but I generally read pretty close to grade level.

        1. The congressman’s hoping stories like this bring the war back into the political dialogue. These sentences can kind of long

  2. FOUR MORE YEARS!!!

    1. Of Obama or of the War in Afghanistan?

      1. Isn’t that the same thing?

      2. Yes.

      3. Yes.

  3. I dunno what I did to deserve the asian dating auto-ad, but thanks, me!

    1. Now I’m getting the Muslima (since I clicked on that IKEA link). Nice dark-eyed beauties.

      1. The SnorgTees girl is looking pretty rough in the “Unzip Your Genes” ad.

  4. that’s some damning alt-text.

  5. The continued mismanagement of the war in Afghanistan is part of Obama’s broader failing foreign policy, but remains a background (if even) issue in the 2012 election. Candidates trying to make Afghanistan an issue aren’t gaining much traction

    Well we wouldn’t want anything to distract voters from Obama’s excellent stewardship of the economic recovery, now would we… /sarc

  6. Afghanistan remains unlikely to be seriously addressed.

    Candidate Obama: More combat battalions to Afghanistan! More I say!

  7. Take up the White Man’s burden–
    In patience to abide,
    To veil the threat of terror
    And check the show of pride;
    By open speech and simple,
    An hundred times made plain
    To seek another’s profit,
    And work another’s gain.

    http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/…..pling.html

  8. If he had any guts to tell the truth, Romney would slam Obama in the debate “Mr. Obama bring those troops home NOW!”

  9. If Romney wins the election we’ll see lots of protests against the U.S. drone bombing campaign and U.S. participation in the fighting in Afghanistan.

  10. Seems like when I was a kid, war casualties were reported as killed, wounded and missing, and for both sides. Whatever happened to that?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.