Deliberate Breeding of 'Ethical' People is a Moral Obligation
Claims Professor Julian Savulescu of Oxford University
Professor Julian Savulescu said that creating so-called designer babies could be considered a "moral obligation" as it makes them grow up into "ethically better children".
The expert in practical ethics said that we should actively give parents the choice to screen out personality flaws in their children as it meant they were then less likely to "harm themselves and others".
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Whose ethics? Mine? His? The mullah on a street corner in Iran? A Jehovah's Witness?
Is homosexuality harm? Is heterosexuality harm? A drive to be monotheistic or polytheistic?
And if you do find the genes that govern such things, assuming they exist, you open up the possibility of PEOPLE being hacked or the targets of a nasty trojan horse virus.
Suppose someone engineered a virus to selectively delete the gene for heterosexuality, assuming one exists? Slower than an actual plague, but the country you release it in might die out in a generation or two.