Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

None of Your Facebook Friends Are Real

The social media company says there are more fake accounts in its system than it previous acknowledged.

Jesse Walker | 8.2.2012 10:28 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The next time you start talking to a stranger on Facebook, you might want to break out the Turing test. Mashable reports:

The number of fake accounts on Facebook is roughly the size of Egypt's population and larger than most of the world's countries, the company disclosed this week.

In a 10-Q filing, Facebook acknowledged that a total of 8.7% -- or 83 million -- accounts on the network are bogus. Of that 8.7%, 4.8% are duplicate accounts, 2.4% are user-misclassified accounts and 1.5% are "undesirable" accounts, a.k.a. spam.

In the 2008 elections, by contrast, the winning candidate received a little less than 67 million votes. If those social-media ghosts get organized, they could crush us like bugs.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: This Is How You Stick Up For Semi-Famous Writers Who Make Stuff Up and Lie About It

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

CultureScience & TechnologySocial MediaFacebookFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (77)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. HazelMeade   13 years ago

    I have two facebook accounts. One is professional and family, and the other one is friends and acquaintances.
    I honestly don't see what is objectionable about wanting to keep those two groups separate.
    Neither is "fake", and nobody really puts everything about their lives up on their facebook page. There just happens to be some stuff that you do that you don't necessarily want your boss or your mom knowing all about, and facebook's privacy features are so inadequate it's easier to just keep two accounts to be sure they are separated.

    1. MP   13 years ago

      facebook's privacy features are so inadequate it's easier to just keep two accounts to be sure they are separated.

      Even if it was adequate, it's untrustworthy, as they change their policy all the time and it's very hard to know what other things they're revealing without your knowledge.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        Facebook for me these days is pretty much only for baby pics and then only because my wife tags me in hers. And stalking known female crossfitters...

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Wait, you actually post things on Facebook?

      All I use it for is a couple of games and to bug the shit out of my conservative/liberal friends when the post their idiotic "go team" bs.

      Oh I also follow the Cato, The Economist, Reason, Mises and a couple of other libertarianish or economics related blogs, but post something original myself, yeah not so much.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        For some reason I get a kick out the facebook comments to reason posts. It's like facebook is populated by nothing but Washington Journal callers.

        1. Ted S.   13 years ago

          So you're the person who watches "Washington Journal".

      2. PS   13 years ago

        Wait, you actually follow the The Ecommunist? I used to read it cover to cover many years ago, now it's just another TEAM BLUE cheerleader, albeit more sophisticated than, say, Newsweek.

  2. Apatheist ?_??   13 years ago

    Of that 8.7%, 4.8% are duplicate accounts, 2.4% are user-misclassified accounts and 1.5% are "undesirable" accounts, a.k.a. spam.

    But what about the other 91.3%, are those skynet?

    1. The Hammer   13 years ago

      11.3% are actual people who use it as an alternative form of communicating with remote friends and old acquaintances, 80% are attention-starved idiots.

      1. Apatheist ?_??   13 years ago

        I was being pedantic. The way they wrote it 4.8% of the 8.7% are duplicate accounts (0.42% of total accounts).

  3. flye   13 years ago

    OK I'll bite. What percent of HR commentor accounts are real?

    1. flye   13 years ago

      ..H and R...

      1. MP   13 years ago

        I miss ampersands.

    2. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

      Has there ever been a Top 10 Best Hit and Run Trolls list?

      1. SugarFree   13 years ago

        The best trolling is unrecognizable as such.

        1. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

          This best trolls are the Arabic anon-bots that kept posting on the obscure articles pre-2005.

          1. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

            ...or the "nfl jerseys" anon-bot that posted on the old Julian Sanchez articles.

        2. SIV   13 years ago

          That's my motto.

      2. HazelMeade   13 years ago

        I nominate Organic Girl.

    3. Paul.   13 years ago

      OK I'll bite. What percent of HR commentor accounts are real?

      All of them. No one here is pretending to be something they're not.

      If you're a fuckwit troll making shit comments, you're a fuckwit troll making shit comments.

      1. Brett L   13 years ago

        Except for waffles and his sock puppets.

        1. Paul.   13 years ago

          Nope, they're all real sockpuppets.

    4. Loki   13 years ago

      0%. We're all just figments of Mary Stack's imagination.

  4. Ice Nine   13 years ago

    Interesting timing on this article. I am not a Facebook user because of the egregious privacy issues. But I did set up a bogus account last year for the specific purpose of a one-shot attempt to locate an old friend. Used a real throw-away email address and a phony name (the one that went with that email address), birth date, etc. Tried to log onto it again last week for the first time in a year and the account had been cancelled - not for non-use but because, as FB informed me, it was a phony account! I found this very spooky. One of you FB/tech mavens care to tell me how FB knew the account was phony? And how does this jibe with FB's apparent tolerance of those other 82.9999999 million bogus accounts?

    1. The Hammer   13 years ago

      The other 82.99999 million bogus accounts still give them site hits. Yours only gave them one, so fuck you.

  5. Randian   13 years ago

    I wish all of my fake friends would shut the fuck up about Chick-Fil-A. In a season sure to be filled with Stupid, the Chick-fil-A thing is the Cool Whip and cherry on top of a Stupid Sundae.

    1. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

      I drove passed a Chick-fil-A yesterday to see if there were any lines. Sure enough, the drive-thru was backed up 10 to 15 cars. Also, the "Appreciation Day" got some attention from the late local TV news. I just thought it had to be embarrassing for the people who just wanted a Spicy Grilled Chick'n sandwich and weren't looking to make a political statement.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        Not wanting to make a political statement is making a political statement.

        1. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

          Even if all you wanted were some waffle fries? That's a political statement?!

          1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

            They are making the statement that waffle fries should not be banned.

            1. The Hammer   13 years ago

              Which pisses Bloomberg right the fuck off.

      2. Randian   13 years ago

        On my Facebook feed, the Librul friends tried to say how crappy Chick-Fil-A's food was anyway.

        Yeah fucking right. Chick-Fil-A is fucking delicious. "Ain't nobody got time for that!"

        1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

          I'm with you on all counts here:

          1) Everyone STFU about Chick Fil A I don't care FUCK!!! "The Cool Whip and cherry of...stupid..." lulz
          2) Chick Fil A is the shizznit. Delectable, fresh, never "soggy" (as some have claimed)....just crisp and delicious! You wanna not eat there? Fine. Moar for me!

        2. Loki   13 years ago

          I suspect that a lot of your librul friends are stupid pretentious hipsters who only eat organic, fair trade, locally sourced blah blah blah WTF ever, crap. All the while looking down their smug little noses at anyone who eats *gasp* FAST FOOD.

          Which I could care less about their dietary choices if they'd just STFU about it already, and stop spewing their noxious smug into the air.

          1. Suki   13 years ago

            Just about everything at Chick-Fil-A is organic, except for the salt and ice.

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Tell me about it.

      I keep wanting to ask them if they would be comfortable with their employer firing them for their political beliefs.

      I patronize or do not patronize an establishment based solely on the good/service they provide. I really don't care what political views the owners/managers of that establishment have. When it comes to Fast Food frankly Chick Fil A has probably the 2nd best food of any national chain (Chipotle is better) and as such I wouldn't care if they were a bunch of satan worshiping maoist Yankees fans I'm still gonna buy their food on occasion.

      1. The Hammer   13 years ago

        Are Jack in the Box and Carls Jr. national?

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          I'm in the Northeast and have never seen either one in person.

          1. Ted S.   13 years ago

            There used to be a Jack-in-the-Box decades ago in Kingston, NY, and I presume in other places of the northeast. I never ate there.

        2. RBS   13 years ago

          Yes, but in the East Carls Jr. is Hardees.

        3. Brett L   13 years ago

          No Jack-in-the-Box in FL. The nearest one to Tallahassee is on I-10 just into Lousiana. No, seriously, I googled it because I wanted JitB badly enough that I was considering making a roadtrip.

        4. Rasilio   13 years ago

          No they are mostly in the west, with scattered representation elsewhere. Even Hardees which is related to them pretty much only exists in the South/Midwest.

          Up here in the Northeast as near as I can tell we havn't got any of those brands.

          1. The Hammer   13 years ago

            Ok. Then I agree with your assertion that Chick Fil A is a top two national brand.

      2. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

        Personally, I refuse to buy anything from a store hideous enough to hire employees who would take part of their paycheck to patronize a store that is repulsive enough to hire someone who would use part of their paycheck to eat at Chick Fil A.

        1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

          I the tracking logrithm you clearly have to help you determine this.

          *respeck*

    3. ant1sthenes   13 years ago

      Chik-fil-A should capitalize on it with an ad campaign suggesting that the chickens and cows are manipulating the liberals and conservatives, respectively, behind the scenes, and laughing at all the retarded humans.

      1. HazelMeade   13 years ago

        Maybe something with a scene where the Cows and Humans are all eating together in the house, standing on two feet and wearing clothes.

  6. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

    Why would you use Facebook to talk to strangers?

    1. T   13 years ago

      To get laid? Just guessing here.

      1. Rasilio   13 years ago

        I thought that's what AdultFriendFinder was for?

        1. The Hammer   13 years ago

          Facebook has more members.

          1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

            You said "members"....huh huh, huh huh, huh huh....

      2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        That seems like the dumbest way to go about this.

  7. Mint Berry Crunch   13 years ago

    Well shit, does this mean the page for That guy in Karate kid that screams "Get him a body bag... Yea" isn't real?

    1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

      Sweep the leg. You got a problem with that?

  8. Old Mexican   13 years ago

    Most of those "fake" accounts are duplicates created by people who send themselves gifts for their Cityville and Farmville games.

    1. Scotticus Finch   13 years ago

      Everything about that sentence makes me sad.

    2. HazelMeade   13 years ago

      It won't be long before they are bots, used to "farm" Farmville gifts to give to facebook user in exchange for Warcraft gold.

  9. T   13 years ago

    My wife set up a facebook account for one of our dogs. (He has more friends on Facebook than I do, btw) Most of his friends are other dogs of the same breed. Has Facebook included crazy shit like this in the statistics? Or is my dog's account considered real?

    1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

      Most of his friends are other dogs of the same breed.

      Easily the most racist thing I've heard today. And I've heard a lot of racist things.

      1. RBS   13 years ago

        I don't know, John said "Coon" below. That's so racist I didn't even read the rest of his post.

        /hypersensitive moron

      2. T   13 years ago

        It's even worse. He's a West Higland White Terrier.

        Can't get much more racist than that, right?

    2. Spoonman.   13 years ago

      On the internet, everyone knows you're a Labrador.

  10. anon   13 years ago

    Wait, people aren't who they say they are on the internet!? NO FUCKING WAY DUDE!

  11. heller   13 years ago

    How many reason commenters are posting under fake names???

    1. John   13 years ago

      You mean fluffy isn't really named fluffy? I always figured he was a bored Maine Coon whose owners forgot to password protect the computer when they were at work.

      1. heller   13 years ago

        Racist?

        1. $park?   13 years ago

          Extra racist. Although, at least it's not a Maine Coon named Monday.

    2. kinnath   13 years ago

      w3@s3l is a fake name. kinnath is a real name, but not the one my momma gave me.

      1. kinnath   13 years ago

        So the squirrels decided the fake name need to be automatically converted to a "mail to" hyperlink.

  12. Paul.   13 years ago

    The number of fake accounts on Facebook is roughly the size of Egypt's population and larger than most of the world's countries, the company disclosed this week.

    I only have a fake facebook account. I would never put real information on facebook. Other people can see that shit.

  13. Paul.   13 years ago

    Oh, and how is this even news?

    "Public website which provides fields in which you can type shit has large amount of false information."

    Seriously?

    1. anon   13 years ago

      The fact that people are actually willing to buy that information is hilarious. I think Facebook's numbers are a little on the low side.

  14. Paul.   13 years ago

    In a 10-Q filing, Facebook acknowledged that a total of 8.7% -- or 83 million -- accounts

    Wait... how does Facebook know this? Seriously? How do they know that an account on facebook called, "Chick Wilmington", that has a portrait, likes, favorites, the whole shebang is "fake" or "real"?

    They must be using some test, some metric to come to that conclusion. I'd sure like to know what it is.

  15. Spoonman.   13 years ago

    OT but awesome: cops and lightbulbs

    1. sage   13 years ago

      That's fucking funny.

  16. Alice   13 years ago

    It cann't be so clear as people like. It is quite normal!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Americans Celebrate Independence Day Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever

J.D. Tuccille | 7.2.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Take a Bite out of Crime

Charles Oliver | 7.2.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's 'Giant Win' Does Not Validate His Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 12:01 AM

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!