Health care reformers say they have two objectives: to enable the uninsured and under-insured to consume more medical services than they consume now, and to keep the prices of those services from rising, as they have been, faster than the prices of other goods and services. Unfortunately, Economics 101 tells us that to accomplish those two things directly—increased consumption by one group and lower prices—the government would have to take a third step: rationing. The reformers are disingenuous about this last step, writes Sheldon Richman, and for good reason. People don't like rationing, especially of medical care.
Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.
Reason is supported by: