Reformers Aim To Improve Conditions for Abused Workers at America's Imperial Outposts


Empire can be messy.

One of the easiest ways for a politician to get good press is to go in front of a camera and mumble something about "human trafficking" and "modern slavery." Very often, the planned initiative or legislation targets both abused immigrants forced to work and live in horrendous conditions, as well as people voluntarily engaged in some business, such as the sex trade, that is officially discouraged, making it difficult to gauge the extent of the real problem. So it's interesting to read a report that credibly documents the defrauding, coercion and mistreatment of thousands of laborers by contractors providing services to United States government military and diplomatic outposts around the world. And now there's even legislation to limit the abuses.

The ACLU and the Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic at Yale Law School compiled Victims of Complacency: The Ongoing Trafficking and Abuse of Third Country Nationals by U.S. Government Contractors (PDF), in which they found:

U.S. Government contractors rely upon some 70,000 TCNs to support U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. To recruit TCNs, contractors use local recruiting agents, who target vulnerable workers—many of whom earn less than $1 per day—in countries like Nepal, India, the Philippines, and Uganda. Many of these agents charge prospective TCNs recruiting fees of between $2,000-5,000, and deceive TCNs about the location or conditions of the work they will perform as well as the wages and benefits they will receive. Agents may promise salaries of $1,000 or more per month, and even recruit workers under the false pretense of job openings at luxury hotels in Dubai or Amman. The exorbitant fees they charge require many TCNs to borrow funds from loan sharks, who often resort to violence and intimidation to recover their investments from TCNs or their families.

In some cases, TCNs do not become aware that they are destined for Iraq or Afghanistan until after they reach transit points in Dubai or Kuwait City, or else upon arrival at the airport in Baghdad or Kandahar. Many TCNs arrive to learn that they will earn as little as $150-275 a month, not the promised $1,000, while others discover that no jobs await them at all. In such situations, some contractors hold TCNs in crowded, dirty warehouses for weeks or even months on end, forbidding them from returning home while at the same time refusing to pay them or let them seek alternative means of employment. All the while, TCNs accrue monthly interest on their debts at rates that can soar as high as 50% per year.

The report cites such incidents as a 2008 protest by Asian workers who had paid more than $2,000 to secure jobs that turned out to be rather lousier than advertised:

About 1,000 Asian men who were hired by a Kuwaiti subcontractor to the U.S. military have been confined for as long as three months in windowless warehouses near the Baghdad airport without money or work.

Najlaa International Catering Services, a subcontractor to KBR, the Texas firm formerly known as Halliburton, hired the men, who are from India, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. On Tuesday, they protested outside their compound over living conditions.

"It's really dirty," a Sri Lankan man told McClatchy Newspapers, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he still wants to work for Najlaa. "For all of us, there are about 12 toilets and about 10 bathrooms. The food — it's three half-liter (1-pint) bottles of water a day. Bread, cheese and jam for breakfast. Lunch is a small piece of meat, potato and rice. Dinner is rice and dal, but it's not dal," he said, referring to the lentil dish.

Writing just last year for the New Yorker, Sarah Stillman said of such workers:

Many of them recount having been robbed of wages, injured without compensation, subjected to sexual assault, and held in conditions resembling indentured servitude by their subcontractor bosses. Previously unreleased contractor memos, hundreds of interviews, and government documents I obtained during a yearlong investigation confirm many of these claims and reveal other grounds for concern.

So the ACLU/Yale report compiles and  formalizes stories that had been trickling out and suggests remedies that might, hopefully, improve the lot of people working in lousy circumstances on behalf of the U.S. government. In short form, the recommendations are:

1. Prohibit Trafficking, Deceptive Recruiting, Forced Labor and Other Abuses
2. Hold Prime Contractors Responsible for the Recruitment, Hiring, and Treatment
of TCNs
3. Encourage Direct Hire of TCNs by primary contractors
4. Ensure Passport Access
5. Prohibit Exploitative Worker Contracts
6. Require Fair Pay and Time Off
7. Mandate Safe and Habitable Living Conditions
8. Require Medical Care and Insurance under Defense Base Act
9. Facilitate Regular Contact with Home and Family
10. Safeguard the Right of Return

These points all seem perfectly reasonable conditions for contracts with government agencies, with "fair pay" defined as nothing more earth-shattering than "monthly wages equivalent to the amounts specified in their employment contracts." Yes, banning coerced work, paying people what they've been contractually promised and eventually returning them home sounds like a good baseline for treatment of people providing services to the U.S. government.

The End Trafficking in Government Contracting Act of 2012, now under consideration in Congress, would essentially enact what the report recommends. It has a list of sponsors from both sides of the aisle, and appears to be one of those rare situations when the word "bipartisan" shouldn't send you looking for someplace to hide.

Of course, one wonders if engaging in far-flung imperial projects spanning the planet doesn't inherently create situations in which abuse and fraud become not just likely, but inevitable …

NEXT: Greg Beato on Eating Bugs

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Slavery always begins with the government looking the other way.

    1. Slavery has existed in one form or another throughout human history, so probably pre-dates government.

      1. Probably not. Slavery, property, government, law, heirarchy, and agriculture all arose at about the same time. None of them make sense in hunter-gatherer societies.

  2. Wow that is just disgraceful, although I cant say I’m suprised. The US government seems determined to destroy our international reputation these days.

  3. I don’t see the words “living wage” in there anywhere.

  4. Wow that is just disgraceful, although I cant say I’m suprised. The US government seems determined to destroy our international reputation these days.

  5. So, blackbirding basically. Fucking disgusting.

    1. Thanks for this term, was unaware of that.

      1. The more you know!

  6. It’s not only US contractors. This is a big problem in all the Arab oil kingdoms. All those pretty skyscrapers in the UAE are built with basically slave labor. Just another reason not to have anything to do with those people.

  7. Slavery, or something very close to it, still exists in the US. The large tomato farms in Florida are basically old-south plantations and the workers are often native born, English-speaking, US citizens. Cases regularly surface of domestics (usually non-citizens) being kept in involuntary servitude. And until the mid-twentieth century the coal miners of Appalachia were industrial serfs.

    1. Slavery, or something very close to it, still exists in the US. The large tomato farms in Florida are basically old-south plantations and the workers are often native born, English-speaking, US citizens.

      If you’re free to leave at any time, and your employer isn’t defrauding you — they are fulfilling all the contractual promises they made — it’s not slavery at all.

      Doing a job you personally wouldn’t want to do =/= slavery.

      1. They’re not free to leave. Google “slavery in florida tomato fields”.

  8. All the legislation in the world is no substitute for the well-deserved firing of the people responsible. Which we can do without the new law.

    And, I predict, the new law will be completely ineffective without those firings.

    So why don’t we skip the bloviating and get right to the terminating?

  9. Oh, and the garment factories in the Marianas Islands, a US territory, are also uncomfortably close to slavery. Particularly grim is that these garments are legally made in USA (sorta) so everyone thinks they’re buying products made by free, voluntarily employeed labor.

    1. We make a desert and call it free market capitalism.

  10. a subcontractor to KBR, the Texas firm formerly known as Halliburton

    Wait, what? Halliburton still exists. KBR was a wholly owned sub of Halliburton which Halliburton spun off into a separate company. If they can’t get this simple fact right, I wonder about the rest of the reporting

    1. Yeah, that was grade A stupid. The cynic in me makes me think they wanted to make sure that Halliburton was linked to KBR because more people recognize it as one of those evil corporashuns. Which is stupid because they could have said “a former subsidiary” and because “Burn Loot” used to be considered evil in its own right.

      1. That quote is not from the actual ACLU report, it’s from this Seattle Times article:…..raq03.html

        The report itself doesn’t mention Halliburton.

  11. How about if we stop having Imperial Outposts then their won’t be any abused workers at those Imperial Outposts.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.