Jacob Sullum on the Supreme Court's Invitation to Impose Mandates Through Taxes

Reason Staff | 7.4.2012 7:00 AM

Last week supporters and opponents of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act anxiously awaited the Supreme Court's ruling on the law's individual health insurance mandate. Imagine their surprise, writes Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, when the Court announced that there is no individual health insurance mandate.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

NEXT: Brickbat: Trail of Tears

Hide Comments (0)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Please log in to post comments

Jacob Sullum on the Supreme Court's Invitation to Impose Mandates Through Taxes

Latest

Revised Section 702 Surveillance Authority Poses More Danger Than Ever

Could Virtual Cashiers Be the Future of the Restaurant Industry?

Alvin Bragg's 'Election Interference' Narrative Is Nonsensical

USC Cancels Valedictorian's Speech Over Bogus 'Safety Concerns'

U.S. Sentencing Commission Restricts Federal Judges' Ability To Use Acquitted Conduct at Sentencing

Recommended

Login Form