Right-to-Work Wisconsin?
Wisconsin may perhaps be on the road to passing right-to-work legislation. According to a recent Reason-Rupe poll of 708 Wisconsin residents, 51 percent favor a law in Wisconsin "that would no longer require workers in unionized companies to pay union dues as a condition of employment." This number is largely unchanged (52 percent) among likely voters.
Governor Scott Walker's controversial Act 10 made paying public union dues voluntary, effectively making union membership also voluntary and public sector employment right-to-work. Now that Walker has survived the recall election, should we expect Wisconsin's private sector to also move toward the right-to-work column in the near future?
Public sector workers are most likely to oppose a right-to-work law in Wisconsin, with 58 percent in opposition; however, 53 percent among private sector workers approve. Others who strongly oppose are those with a post-graduate degrees (57 percent), Occupy Wall Street supporters (56 percent), Democrats (55 percent), and households with union members (53 percent).
Those who favor right-to-work legislation in Wisconsin include 68 percent of Tea Party supporters, 66 percent of Republicans, 61 percent among those over sixty-five years old and 57 percent among those aged forty-five to fifty-four, and 54 percent among those making more than $75,000 a year and 53 percent among those making less than $30,000 a year.
Right To Work
Some historical perspective is useful here. In the 1930s it was argued that federal intervention in labor markets was necessary to resolve disputes between labor and business. In 1935 Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or the Wagner Act, setting up the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB) as the official arbiter of labor unions. With sufficient employee support, a company's employees could petition to receive union authorization. Only one union would be permitted per business. Since businesses were required to only negotiate with the one union, they were required to collectively bargain with union representatives over pay and working conditions. It also required employees of unionized companies to pay union dues as a condition of employment.
Twelve years later, the Taft-Hartley Act amended the NLRA, allowing states to pass right-to-work laws that prevented unions from requiring companies to fire workers who refused to join the union. Essentially, right-to-work laws made union membership voluntary and brought the choice of paying union dues back to the individual.
The following chart shows which states have right-to-work laws and those that do not.
Right-To-Work | Not Right-To-Work |
Alabama | Alaska |
Arizona | California |
Arkansas | Colorado |
Florida | Connecticut |
Georgia | Delaware |
Idaho | Hawaii |
Indiana | Illinois |
Iowa | Kentucky |
Kansas | Maine |
Louisiana | Maryland |
Mississippi | Massachusetts |
Nebraska | Michigan |
Nevada | Minnesota |
North Carolina | Missouri |
North Dakota | Montana |
Oklahoma | New Hampshire |
South Carolina | New Jersey |
South Dakota | New Mexico |
Tennessee | New York |
Texas | Ohio |
Utah | Oregon |
Virginia | Pennsylvania |
Wyoming | Rhode Island |
Vermont | |
Washington | |
West Virginia | |
Wisconsin |
Source: National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
If additional states, such as Wisconsin, wish to change the relationship between labor unions and business and allow workers the choice of joining a union, legislation must be passed in that state. Given Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's ability to withstand a recall election after making public-employees effectively right-to-work, an expansion of right-to-work in the private sector may perhaps follow.
Full poll results can be found here and cross tabs here.
ORC International conducted fieldwork for the poll, May 14th-18th 2012 of both mobile and landline phones, 708 Wisconsin adults, margin of error +/- 3.7%. Likely Wisconsin voters (609, MOE +/-4%) include registered respondents who said they are absolutely certain to vote or very likely to vote in the June 5th recall election for governor.
Emily Ekins is the director of polling for Reason Foundation where she leads the Reason-Rupe public opinion research project, launched in 2011. Follow her on Twitter @emilyekins.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think there's a ways to go before the discussion about making Wisconsin RTW comes to pass, but it would certainly be prudent to see how things progress in Indiana, where that state has just recently become a RTW state. Clearly there are advantages to making the change (http://bit.ly/Ad4S85), but as with most thing, timing will be very important.
Given the recent election results, this seems like a no-brainer.
I look forward to hearing about how not forcing people to join unions against their will equates to taking away their rights.
But it's interesting that the states with right-to-work have lower wages. I don't know why anyone would want that.
They also have lower unemployment, since wages aren't forced to a level where you can't get a job.
Knowing other people in your state are getting higher wages while you're unemployed because of the laws that made those wages high is not generally desirable among rational people.
"But it's interesting that the states with right-to-work have lower wages. I don't know why anyone would want that."
Source? I get the feeling this comparison is being made BEFORE the Unions get their hands into the worker's paycheck.
bon poste,tee shirt femme pas cher
je vous remercie pour le partage!
All states should be right to work states. No one should have to pay union bosses money to work.
This is just another scam by democrats to get money to elect liberals to office.
Wise up folks the best workers will always get paid top money. It's the workers that don't want to work that want the unions protection.
tresor paris necklaces and tresor paris earrings so on. In these activities
Blog muy bueno, sac ? main de marque pas cher se alegra de saber muchas cosas aqu?, espero que a menudo puede ver, muchas gracias!
super blogs thanks admins
sohbet
sohbet odalar?
thanks you very good nice admin room's comment's cinsel chat & chat sohbet