Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Snow White and the Huntsman

A CGI confection spun around the bones of the well-known fairy tale.

Kurt Loder | 6.1.2012 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

What is Charlize Theron doing in this movie—such a fine actress, reduced to shopworn rants and glowers? Or the warmly charismatic Chris Hemsworth (fresh from The Avengers)? And how to explain the presence of Ian McShane, Bob Hoskins, Ray Winstone, and Nick Frost—all of them, it pains me to report, playing dwarves?

Snow White and the Huntsman is a CGI confection spun around the bones of the Grimm fairy tale. The picture has moments of familiar digital beauty, but many more passages of effects and conceptions borrowed directly from earlier films. An otherworldly white stag strongly recalls Harry Potter's guardian Patronus; the sight of a fellowship of humans and dwarves hiking along a rocky mountain ridge is one of several lifts from the Lord of the Rings films; and, going way back, there's a spooky figure erupting into a flock of black birds that seems derived from Madonna's old Frozen video. Not to mention echoes of Braveheart and various Joan of Arc films, as well as a truly lamentable incursion of neo-Disney bunnies and butterflies and adorable, big-eyed pixies.

What the movie lacks are any surprises: being an expensive inflation of one of the best-known of all kiddie tales, it's basically Much Ado About Snow White.

Kristen Stewart, so good in movies like Adventureland and The Yellow Handkerchief, has too much modern spunk to be entirely credible as the pure-hearted Princess Snow, although she gives it a game try. When Snow's mother dies, her father, the king, takes up with and marries the evil Ravenna (Theron), here an immortal harridan who feeds on the beauty of luckless younger women to maintain her own timeless allure. Informed by her trusty mirror (a sort of big gong, oddly) that Snow has displaced her as the fairest in the land, Ravenna dispatches her hissable brother Finn (Sam Spruell, in a prize-winningly silly platinum hairdo) to find a Huntsman (Hemsworth) to take Snow into the fantastical Dark Forest and kill her. The Huntsman falls in love with the winsome princess, as you'll recall, and he effects her escape from Finn and his pursuing soldiers. After a series of computer-assisted adventures (in one of which Snow faces down a rampaging troll with nothing more than simple sweetie-power), the fleeing duo falls in with seven dwarves (several sporting conical Kid 'n Play hair styles); eventually, with the help of Snow's still-infatuated childhood friend William (Sam Claflin), they all make their way back to Ravenna's castle for an inevitable girl-fight confrontation.

First-time director Rupert Sanders ably whips up all the usual medieval muck and battle-axe clangor and skies full of sailing arrows, but we've seen all of this many, many times before. He also wages an uphill battle against some of the dialogue concocted by Evan Daugherty, John Lee Hancock, and Hossein Amini—lines like "She is life itself!" and "You let her slip through your tiny little fingers!" and (with a near-audible thud) "I should've never got involved."

The movie is nicely mounted, for the most part (there's a Ravenna milk-bath scene that has a creamy elegance) and it might be a treat for some young viewers (it's rated PG-13). There's quite a bit of hearty action (however standard-issue), and a modest complement of frights (none of them classic, unfortunately—although the sight of a four-foot-tall Ian McShane is pretty unsettling). For an older audience, though, there's never a moment in which you wonder where this story—a staple of so many childhoods—is going. By the time the movie passes the two-hour mark, you start to wonder why it's taking so long to get there.

Kurt Loder is a writer living in New York. His third book, a collection of film reviews called The Good, the Bad and the Godawful, is now available. Follow him on Twitter at kurt_loder.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A.M. Links: Google Helps Chinese Users Avoid Censored Keywords, Venezuela Bans Private Gun Ownership, the FDA Seeks to Secure Drug for Executions, State of Emergency Expires in Egypt, Eurozone Unemployment at Record High.

Kurt Loder is a New York writer who also hosts the SiriusXM interview show True Stories.

CultureMoviesStaff ReviewsKurt Loder Movie Reviews
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Timrek   13 years ago

    Good honest review. That's about what I expected. I'm now glad Viggo didn't touch this one. Also, am the only one that doesn't think Kristen Stewart's very attractive? She's OK but not at all "fairest in the land'" level of beauty.

    I'll send my wife and daughter.

    1. MP   13 years ago

      They were ripping on that on the radio this AM. I believe the comparison was White Stripes Lead Singer with a Wig and a Dress.

      And give the way Charlize is made to look in that movie...that talking mirror is dumber than a bag o' bricks.

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Yeah she is definately only ok on the beauty scale. Not ugly by any stretch but at best she has a "believable girl next door" sort of beauty rather than an "OMG am I looking at an angel" type.

      That said I havn't seen the movies she was supposedly good in but from what I have seen of her acting she ranks right up there with Denise Richards (who is way better looking, especially when whe was the same age as Kristen) in terms of being truely horrible.

      1. ChrisO   13 years ago

        She was good in the Runaways movie. I believe she played Joan Jett.

        1. The Hammer   13 years ago

          She did, and she was.

    3. perlhaqr   13 years ago

      Well, she doesn't compete very favorably with Theron, that's for sure.

  2. R C Dean   13 years ago

    I have to say, I'm getting a little tired of these warrior princesses who look like they can barely lift an hors d'eouvre (also, a minor quibble with Serenity, BTW.

    Seriously, if you want a credible fightin' female, she needs a few frickin' muscles, a la Linda Hamilton in T2.

    1. MP   13 years ago

      I haven't seen the actual film yet, but there was certainly some legitimacy in having former MMA star Gina Carano as an action hero.

      Cory Everson also played the part of female warrior in a few Hercules TV episodes. That's the gold standard for hot female warrior.

      1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        That film was pretty mediocre. Some good fight scenes, but still basically on the 'not believable' side of the street. I mean if you're going to make a standard action movie, why bother putting Gina Carano in it.

        She wasn't bad by any means, but it was just kind of a waste. Also completely wasted the use of Ewan Macgregor and Antonio Banderas.

        And COMPLETELY wasted Bill Paxton.

        It's like they just cobbled together a few scenes from whatever Bourne movie they could find and put a chick in it instead.

        Worth watching but meh. Probably about the same as this Snow White trifle.

    2. HazelMeade   13 years ago

      What about that chick who is a knight in Game of Thrones?

      1. T   13 years ago

        Completely believable. She looks like an old school Eastern European 'female' athlete.

    3. kinnath   13 years ago

      Linda went from Beauty and the Beast to legitimate action hero. The difference between Linda in T1 and T2 is impressive.

  3. RigDaVig   13 years ago

    That looks like its gonna be cool dude.

    http://www.Data-Privacy.tk

  4. HazelMeade   13 years ago

    Please don't attitube the white stag thing to Harry Potter. That's been a recurrent element in myths and fairy tales dating back to the greeks. Harry Potter is derivative, it borrows most of it's elements from pre-existing fantasy, fairy tale and mythological literature.

    1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

      I think he's just saying we've seen a CGI rendered ghostly 3-D hart prancing about the screen fairly recently.

      1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        I'm with Hazel--attributing that to Harry Potter is silly, as that's just one of the many things in Harry Potter derived from earlier works and myths.

        1. T   13 years ago

          Tyolet laughs at your Harry Potter.

          1. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

            I don't read it like he thinks Rowling was the first person to use the stag in a story, but that you're not going to see that part of this movie without thinking of our poor Harry's dead dad.

            1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              It's too much used in myth and fantasy to do that to any but the most obsessed Potterians. Never even occurred to me when I saw the film.

              1. Gojira   13 years ago

                What about to people who aren't into a bunch of old-timey myths and fairytales?

                I've only seen the stupid Potter films once, and never read the books, but that is still what I would think of.

                1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                  Oh, Jim, we need to send you away for a classical education.

  5. sweeterjan   13 years ago

    arlier films. An otherworldly white stag strongly recalls Harry Potter's guardian Patronus; the sight of a http://www.vendreshox.com/nike-shox-r3-c-8.html fellowship of humans and dwarves hiking along a rocky mountain ridge is one of several lifts from the Lord of the Rings films; and, going way back, there's a spooky figure erupting into a flock of black birds that

  6. sweeterjan   13 years ago

    What about to people who http://www.vendreshox.com/nike-shox-r3-c-8.html aren't into a bunch of old-timey myths and fairytales?

  7. joy   13 years ago

    the fleeing duo falls in with seven dwarves (several sporting conical Kid 'n Play hair styles); eventually, with the help of Snow's still-infatuated childhood friend William (Sam Claflin), http://www.riemeninnl.com/riem.....-c-16.html they all make their way back to Ravenna's castle for an inevitable girl-fight confrontation.

  8. booboognu   13 years ago

    A lot of Hollywood movies these days are written with heavy occult meanings. If you do not know occult/Luciferian beliefs, the movies will not make a lot sense, and will seem like a poorly made PoS. If you understand what these people believe, the movie is actually really good. Not saying I thought the movie was good, but it laid out their beliefs very well and you know what to expect. Each facet of occultism is covered, voodoo, earth worship, Luciferian, witchcraft, satanism, masonry, newage etc.

    I would break it all down, but basically the Queen in how Luciferians believe the Christian God to be, and Snow White is the so-called "Virtuous" Lucifer. They believe if they deny God worship that he will fall.

    I don't believe the stuff, but maybe I perked your attention enough to go see if I am right or wrong.

    1. Harvey_birdman   13 years ago

      Where did you get that nonsense?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Obama Adviser Jason Furman on Biden, Neoliberalism, and Keynesian Economics

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2025 issue

The Federal Government Owns Too Much Land. Selling It Helps Rural Communities.

Jack Nicastro | 6.20.2025 5:37 PM

A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.20.2025 4:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!