Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Hate-Free Hate Crime

Dharun Ravi trial

Jacob Sullum | From the July 2012 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Newspaper stories about Dharun Ravi's trial, which ended in March, frequently noted that prosecutors were not blaming him for the death of Tyler Clementi, his roommate at Rutgers University. But if Clementi, an 18-year-old freshman, had not jumped off the George Washington Bridge on September 22, 2010, Ravi probably never would have been charged with a crime, let alone convicted of one that could send him to prison for 10 years.

The crime, "bias intimidation," is usually tied to a violent offense motivated by bigotry. But in this case, it was based on a nonviolent offense: On September 19, 2010, after Clementi asked Ravi to leave him alone in their room with an older male visitor, Ravi used a webcam to spy on the two men. He caught a few seconds of them kissing, tweeted that he had seen Clementi "making out with a dude," and planned another viewing during the man's next visit two days later, daring his Twitter followers to watch. That never happened, apparently because Clementi unplugged Ravi's computer.

When he found out about the spying and tweeting, Clementi was angry. He complained to a resident adviser and requested a room change. But it is not clear what role, if any, Ravi's invasion of privacy played in Clementi's suicide.

The jury that convicted Ravi nevertheless concluded that Clementi, who was openly gay, felt intimidated, and reasonably so, by what he called Ravi's "five sec peep." Under New Jersey law, that was enough to convict Ravi of bias intimidation. The jury also concluded that Ravi's subsequent behavior was aimed at intimidating Clementi because of his sexual orientation, although there was no evidence that Ravi was hostile to Clementi or gay people in general. And that is why, as New York Times columnist Bill Keller put it in April, "Ravi faces up to 10 years in prison for being a jerk." 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: No to ObamaCare

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Gindjurra   14 years ago

    If it's appropriate and just to charge and convict someone who was not motivated by hate of a hate crime, then there is no such thing as a crime that is NOT a hate crime.

  2. tipuasher   14 years ago

    thanks buddy you have a great blog
    http://ultimausa.net

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Europe May Never Be Cool, but It Can Be Air Conditioned

J.D. Tuccille | 7.6.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Trust, We Swear

Charles Oliver | 7.6.2026 4:00 AM

America Was Not Founded by 'Tariff Men,' Contrary to This Painting in Trump's White House

Phillip W. Magness | From the July 2026 issue

Trump's Embrace of Psychedelic Therapy Could 'Save a Lot of Lives'

Jacob Sullum | From the August/September 2026 issue

On America's 250th Birthday, the United States Arms the World's Tyrannies

Matthew Petti | 7.4.2026 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason