Time magazine, the weekly paper embodiment of conventional wisdom, sees what's in front of its own eyes and names Ron Paul, congressman, presidential candidate, and topic of my out-soon book Ron Paul's Revolution, one of the 100 Most Influential people. Very interestingly, it does so via an encomium from left-prog hero and scapegoat, Ralph Nader. Ralph saith:
In the debates, only he called out the American Empire's meddling in the business of countless nations around the world. He assails the Pentagon's bloated budgets and has worked with liberal Democrat Barney Frank to shrink the military-industrial complex. He wants to end our boomeranging wars.
Paul, 76, draws a distinction between libertarian conservatives and those corporatist conservatives entrenching a corporate state in which Big Business merges with Big Government. That's why he is against bailouts. His defense of privacy and civil liberties and his opposition to the war on drugs endear him to people beyond his libertarian base. They even include some progressives who cannot abide his views against health, safety and economic regulations or his denunciation of the Federal Reserve's fiat money and social-welfare programs like Medicare.
*In the long slow slog to rack up delegates for the Tampa Republican convention, the Paul campaign is fighting back against shenanigans and shifting deadlines in Alaska that are stymieing Paul's delegates. Details from a Paul campaign press release. (Our readers first got wind of Alaska deadline troubles in this blog post by me from last month)
The Alaska Republican Party state convention is set to be held from April 26th-28th, and all previous communications to would-be delegates have stated that a delegate fee of $250 would be accepted up until the convention registration deadline, which is 2:00 p.m. Alaska Time on April 26th. However, on Monday the 16th state party chairman Randy Reudrich called a state committee meeting at which he stated that delegate fees would be accepted no later than 48 hours from the time of the meeting, which would be Wednesday, April 18th. However, on Tuesday the state party said that delegate fees had to be paid by 6:00 p.m that evening. As individual delegates and campaigns scrambled to pay delegate fees, the state party erected bizarre and allegedly extra-legal obstacles in front of Paul, prolife, and other non-Romney delegates, and communications between self-identifying non-Romney delegates and state party personnel degraded.
One example of the state party trying to frustrate Paul delegates was in exactly when and how delegates could remit their $250 fee. Acceptable methods of payment ranged from online credit card payment on the state party website – although the link to such had been inexplicably removed – to personal checks that were later said to be unacceptable, to money orders that in at least one case were termed unacceptable and returned. The state party, the Ron Paul campaign argues, capriciously moved its payment deadline and modified its acceptable ways of paying the $250 delegate fee expressly to frustrate Paul delegates and in general any delegates outside the tight circle of party-sanctioned non-Romney delegates.
The Party's Rules and Convention Call are designed to facilitate the protection of voting rights and ensure the full and fair participation of Republican voters the delegate selection process. Indeed, paragraph 7 of the Convention Call states: "District committees shall take action to achieve the broadest possible participation of all Qualified Republican voters in the delegate selection process." Clearly the actions of Party officials described above are at odds with that statement. The rights of Alaskans to participate in the political process are being violated by the actions described above.
We are therefore demanding that these political shenanigans cease immediately and that people be allowed to pay their delegate fees in the timeframe as contemplated by the 2012 Convention Call and Party Rules. We further demand that the Party accept payment for these fees in reasonable form, i.e. check, cash, credit card, or money order….
Should the Alaska Republican Party fail to appropriately address these issues immediately, and conform its behavior, the Paul Campaign will pursue all of the legal remedies available to ensure that the process is fair and legal and that the rights of citizens participating in this process are not violated.
*Another set of polls shows Ron Paul running strong in a one-on-one matchup against Obama. From Public Policy Polling:
Ron Paul actually does just as well in a head to head with Obama was Romney, trailing by 3 points at 47-44. Newt Gingrich would be down by 9 at 51-42.
And yet:
there are the potential VP's who hurt Romney- if only slightly. Ron Paul as running mate expands Obama's lead to 4 points at 48-44, Paul Ryan ups it to 5 at 48-43, Rubio to 6 at 49-43, and Palin to 7 at 50-43.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
I haven't looked at a Time for 20 years. Newsweek took the same turn as Time not long after, and I think US News & WR is pretty much there now as well. Bullshit propaganda is like a virus evidently.
I was just pondering whether a Ron Paul VP nomination would get to vote for Romney over Johnson. My initial reaction was no, it's just not enough. However, I haven't had to put up with an entire summer of Obama trolling everyone who isn't on the federal teat, so maybe.
(Not that Romney would ever select Paul, but it was kinda fun to think about having to choose between a ticket with Johnson and a ticket with Paul.)
Yes, it absolutely would be enough for me to vote for the Republican ticket. It would be a huge step forward for the influence of libertarians, at least our ideas would be at the table. Romney seems above all to be a pragmatist, and it's not a bad thing if he recognizes the libertarian moment and how ALL of our issues are particularly pressing today. Moreover, a strong Johnson showing will probably favor an Obama victory, which should make the Romney camp think long and hard about putting a Paul on the ticket.
Hey guys, how do you imbed links?
With ease.
With HTML of course.
HTML <a> tag
Why the hell did Ralph Nader write the Paul article?
"...and his opposition to the war on drugs endear him to people beyond his libertarian base."
Step away from the bong, Ralph. Step away from the bong.
"Newt Gingrich would be down by 9 at 51-42."
I remember Newt dripping some drool to the effect that Paul is so outside the mainstream and unelectable. Delicious!
This is the same issue that had the Warren Buffet love letter written by none other than Our Dear Leader.
I honestly can't make it through a single issue of Time. I usually tap out about a paragraph into Joe Klein's ongoing manifesto.
Boy, that "Triumph of the Gun Fetishists" column was some quality journalism, wasn't it?
Woah, people still read Time?
I haven't looked at a Time for 20 years. Newsweek took the same turn as Time not long after, and I think US News & WR is pretty much there now as well. Bullshit propaganda is like a virus evidently.
RON PAUL! WooHoo!
Well, you jsut gotta love those bought and paid for politicians lol.
http://www.Anon-Data.tk
I was just pondering whether a Ron Paul VP nomination would get to vote for Romney over Johnson. My initial reaction was no, it's just not enough. However, I haven't had to put up with an entire summer of Obama trolling everyone who isn't on the federal teat, so maybe.
(Not that Romney would ever select Paul, but it was kinda fun to think about having to choose between a ticket with Johnson and a ticket with Paul.)
Yes, it absolutely would be enough for me to vote for the Republican ticket. It would be a huge step forward for the influence of libertarians, at least our ideas would be at the table. Romney seems above all to be a pragmatist, and it's not a bad thing if he recognizes the libertarian moment and how ALL of our issues are particularly pressing today. Moreover, a strong Johnson showing will probably favor an Obama victory, which should make the Romney camp think long and hard about putting a Paul on the ticket.