Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Reason-Rupe: 58 Percent of Americans Expect Employer Mandate Will Lower Pay

Emily Ekins | 4.5.2012 1:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A new Reason-Rupe poll finds a majority of Americans (56 percent) favor a provision in the new health care law that requires employers with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance or else pay a fine.

At the same time, 58 percent of Americans expect the employer mandate to drive employers to pay their workers less, 29 percent expect no significant impact on pay. Even among those who support the provision, 50 percent expect employers to reduce pay.

Moreover, nearly half of Americans (47 percent) expect the employer mandate will lead employers to lay off workers. 39 percent think it will not significantly impact employers' hiring decisions.

In the midst of a weak economic recovery, it could be problematic that the public expects this provision to potentially lead to lower incomes and layoffs.

Among those who favor the employer mandate provision, over half (53 percent) do not believe it will lead to layoffs. This suggests more people would oppose the provision if more thought it would result in layoffs. 

However, among those who favor the employer mandate, half expect lower worker pay. One might infer that because of the difficulty and disincentives for accessing portable health insurance, independent of employers, individuals are willing to take a pay cut in order to gain access to the health care market. However, if this regulation were to cause people to lose their jobs they could also lose their access to the health care market.

Full poll results found here.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted March 10th-20th of both mobile and landline phones, 1200 adults, margin of error +/- 3 percent. Columns may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. Full methodology can be found here. 

Emily Ekins is the director of polling for Reason Foundation where she leads the Reason-Rupe public opinion research project, launched in 2011. Follow her on Twitter @emilyekins.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: What We Saw at the San Francisco Marijuana Rally

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PolicyNanny StateIndividual mandateEmployer mandateHealth Care
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    frist!

  2. Tman   13 years ago

    Remember this one? -"You can keep your Doctor or your plan with this new bill."

    Unless of course your employer says "nah, cheaper to pay the penalty than provide health insurance. Oh, and I'm gonna keep the difference rather than pay it out in salary. It will make the bottom line look better."

    Thanks Obama!

    1. shrike   13 years ago

      Employers could drop health insurance coverage anytime as it is.

      So they are MORE likely now with a fine? Do you think at all?

      1. Tman   13 years ago

        You'll probably claim this as propaganda, but here you go stupid-

        http://www.mckinseyquarterly.c.....efits_2813

        Other findings:

        60% of employers said they'll pursue some alternatives to a traditional employer-sponsored insurance plan ? like weighing a switch to a defined-contribution model, in addition to dropping coverage.
        30% of employers would gain economically from dropping coverage ? even if they completely compensated employees for the change through higher salaries and adding other benefits.
        85% of employees would remain at their jobs even if their employer stopped offering health insurance.
        60% of employees would expect their compensation to increase if their employer dropped coverage.

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          Dude...ignore. Just ignore. Just walk away.

          1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

            hey, that's my line!

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              I'm just here for the gasoline.

  3. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

    Tying health insurance to employment is so freaking stupid it boggles the mind, yet it persists and grows. That Democrats have done nothing to change this or even acknowledge the problem says everything you need to know about the healthcare debate. Republicans haven't been much better.

    1. plu1959   13 years ago

      Whenever I try to make this point to lefties, they all refuse to believe that salaries would increase if employers stopped paying for healthcare.

  4. Killazontherun   13 years ago

    To the forty two percent who believe it want effect their pay over time, BBWWHAHHAHAHAHA! I'm here to sell you a saddle for your unicorn.

    1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

      wont effect their pay over time -- homophones, the asshole of all language formations.

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        Don't be a homophonephobe, dude.

        1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

          You're right. I'll be sure to throw in 'there' for 'their' and 'hear' for 'here' next time. Embrace my inner homophone.

          1. Episiarch   13 years ago

            Really go for the gold and use "they're" for "there". Show how much you aren't a homophonephobe.

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              I'm really comfortable around homophones, I just don't think they deserve special rights like getting married or adopting synonyms.

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                Look, I don't need the homophone agenda being pushed on me, OK? And that's what homophone marriage is all about. I mean, "marry" and "Mary" are not the same!

                1. SugarFree   13 years ago

                  "Merry and Mary not Adam and Steve!"

    2. AuH2O   13 years ago

      But is it a gay unicorn that supports abortion?

      Because that determines both how I purchase and how I vote.

  5. squarooticus   13 years ago

    In other news, a majority of Americans still think Iraq was involved with the 9/11 attacks.

    Polls like this are meaningless except as measures of anything but levels of ignorance. I don't understand at all why this is interesting. Outcome surveys, in which people are asked now and then a few years from now for solid numbers about their situation before and after the passage of Obamacare, would tell us something about its actual impact: this poll tells us NOTHING.

    1. squarooticus   13 years ago

      To be more explicit, this is like polling on a statement of fact: asking people for their opinion about something that is either true or false. It tells us nothing about whether that statement is true or false. In this case, opinions about the impact of Obamacare are about as useful as tits on a bull: they say nothing about Obamacare except its popularity. That by itself is interesting, but you may as well just ask people what their opinion of Obamacare is and skip the pseudoscience.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

        I'm sorry to interrupt your dinner, but we're conducting a poll and would like to know if you believe in unicorns.

        1. AuH2O   13 years ago

          I believe in unicorns, but not pegassi. The aerodynamics just don't work out.

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Actually this is not quite true.

      There is some value in knowing how people percieve the outcome of a law/policy/whatever will impact them. True it will not give any information on how it actually WILL impact them but knowing how they think it will can give insight into how they will behave leading up to the implementation of the thing.

      So if the majority of Americans believe that the employer mandate will put their job or salary at risk you can expect to see a pull back in consume spending as people hedge against that fear. if they do not expect this then they will behave as normal.

      1. squarooticus   13 years ago

        That's pretty weak:
        (1) Assuming Americans will cut spending for any reason other than actually running out of money is foolish in light of history.
        (2) Even if it happened, it would be a second-order effect at best.
        (3) I am willing to bet the responses here would correlate almost precisely with answers to the question, "Do you support Obamacare?" In other words, it's just a proxy for the opinion question anyway.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    You know what else lowers employee pay? Wall Street fat cats. I AM THE 99%. (Are we still doing that?)

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      No.

  7. GW   13 years ago

    Let's all chant together:

    Free shit! Free shit! Free shit! Free shit!

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      Obligatory

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      I usually try to avoid taking a shit for free by holding it till I'm on company time.

      Nothing like getting paid $25 - $50 bucks to take a dump 🙂

  8. End Child Unemployment   13 years ago

    If only a rad science fiction writer could have warned us that There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

  9. Pip   13 years ago

    This ratherless world rocks! Thanks Reason!

  10. Pip   13 years ago

    From Savage Love:

    I have an awesome relationship with an awesome guy. He loves me and takes care of me. I'm GGG and he's vanilla. I only draw the line at poop, animals, and children. But he's never asked me for anything other than vanilla sex. Which is why I don't know what to do. I went downstairs late the other night, and he was sitting on the couch masturbating while stroking the cat, which was sitting on his chest. The cat was sitting ON him, Dan, WHILE he was yanking himself. I don't know if he saw me. I went right back upstairs and went to bed. In the morning, he acted like nothing happened. Now I don't know what to do. Confront him? Get him help? Get rid of the cat?
    ? Can't Analyze This

    http://www.citypages.com/advic.....012-04-05/

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   13 years ago

      Buy lots of Meow Mix

    2. AuH2O   13 years ago

      It's called mutlitasking, woman!

    3. fried wylie   13 years ago

      I'd be more weirded out by the cat, not the dude. Cats pick when you get to give them attention....and this cat picked a time when dude was spanking it. He probably swatted at it a few times, the cat flipping its tail in his face and blocking the line of sight to the TV. But, like, he's spankin-it...what's he gonna do, get up and chase the cat outside/upstairs? Nah, you just give up and get back to business, and if you gotta pet the cat to keep it from fuckin up your groove, then you pet the cat.

  11. Killazontherun   13 years ago

    Of course, if the mandate is not defeated, when it reflects in figures down the line showing wage stagnation, the left will use those figures to their rhetorical value. You can count on it.

    1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

      I mean to they're advantage. Sorries.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Will He, Won't He

Christian Britschgi | 6.19.2025 9:53 AM

Why MAGA Turned on Amy Coney Barrett

Damon Root | 6.19.2025 7:00 AM

Utah Passed a Religious Freedom Law. Then Cops Went After This Psychedelic Church.

Jacob Sullum | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: A Bit of a Stretch

Charles Oliver | 6.19.2025 4:00 AM

This Court Case Could Normalize Vibes-Based Regulation

Veronique de Rugy | 6.19.2025 1:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!