Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Remy: Health Care Mandates vs Pizza Toppings

Meredith Bragg | 3.29.2012 12:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Internet sensation Remy explains how pizza can tell us a lot about health care mandates.

Written and performed by Remy and produced by Meredith Bragg.

About 2.30 minutes. Go to Reason.tv for downloadable versions and subscribe to our YouTube channel to get automatic updates when new material goes live.

Follow Reason on Twitter at http://twitter.com/reason

Follow Remy on Twitter at http://twitter.com/GoRemy

For a complete playlist of Reason.tv's health care coverage, go here

For more Remy & Reason.tv vids go here

For even more Remy, go to http://youtube.com/goremy

For more information about state by state minimum coverage mandates, visit www.cahi.org

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Some Questions On ObamaCare's Compassion For Dahlia Lithwick and Other Bleeding-Heart Liberals

Meredith Bragg is the director of special projects at Reason.

PolicyNanny StatePublic HealthHealth Care
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

    Cute. It also shows how costs get out of control by mandating coverage and by requiring people to subsidize other people's coverage needs.

    Healthcare is so much the victim of inept government meddling that I can't get over how anyone can take seriously government plans to solve the problem. . .which call for even more inept government meddling!

    1. MB   13 years ago

      Because some people have got it in their heads that:

      a) government can solve everything (as opposed to non-government solutions)

      and

      b) ONLY government can solve things (again, as opposed to non-government solutions).

    2. Paul   13 years ago

      People don't go to some exchange and pick and choose futures and options on if their dick suddenly gets cut off, they pick from plans designed by actuaries at insurance firms. Of course no one bothers with something so terribly inefficient as picking and choosing medical specifics so you get the bundled plan that some insurance company made and I doubt the government is making it that much worse with these complex securities.

      If the anarcho-capitalist argument is that all trade must be voluntary, then all emergency care is effectively charity and unworthy of being considered trade. You do not have an effective market choice if your entire motivation is duress. If you believe that competition sets a fair market price, patents create a monopoly in which prices are in fact driven up from a reasonable market price where insurance expands their ability to unreasonably inflate prices.

      1. Matt Tanous   13 years ago

        "You do not have an effective market choice if your entire motivation is duress."

        Yes, but emergency care and necessities are not purchased under duress. Urgency != duress.

        1. Paul   13 years ago

          So you're telling me that in most cases emergency care is simply urgent, it's rarely ever a situation in which there is a threat of serious bodily harm or death. That's why people go to doctors?

  2. Kwanzaa Cake   13 years ago

    Are you saying the government totally fucked up the health insurance market 9 ways to Sunday, and now the liberals are claiming that the only solution is even more government? It's like they have some crazy plan to expend their power over every aspect of their lives.

    1. Jeffersonian   13 years ago

      The answer is more leeches, always more leeches.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        We should mandate that insurance policies cover leeches, too.

  3. Joe M   13 years ago

    Damn, Texas has 62 mandates? I would've guessed a lot fewer, but I suppose higher population states will have more and larger interest groups tugging the laws this way and that.

    I also notice that Washington state was the only one that covered acupuncture, massage therapy, and "naturopathic", all three. Fuckin hippies.

    1. Matt   13 years ago

      Texas is also one of the most expensive states when it comes to getting health insurance. Coincidence?

      1. fried pelosi   13 years ago

        Are you serious?!

    2. OIslander   13 years ago

      Yes-our insurance commissioner here in Washington decided on her own that chiropractic quackery, massage therapy and naturopathic "medicine" be mandatory on all policies... She got reelected.

  4. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

    The overall health care political fad that created Obamacare, was frustrating to me because none of the mainstream "sides" even addressed things like this.

  5. Suthenboy   13 years ago

    The only business government has being involved in health care and insurance is making sure the contracting parties abide by their contractual obligations, and that is best done at the state level.

    1. MB   13 years ago

      Why, that's just crazy talk right there!!

    2. mgd   13 years ago

      Why do you hate children and grannies?

  6. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

    This should have been the Friday Funny.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Health insurance bennies a la carte? Are you crazy? No one wants to watch the Travel Channel or E! but if you want A&E, ESPN or Comedy Central you have to pay for the other garbage as well.

    Wait, I'm thinking of cable.

    1. Paul   13 years ago

      Market failure!1!!!1

    2. Joe M   13 years ago

      DON'T TALK SHIT ABOUT TRAVEL.

      1. Bobarian   13 years ago

        Yeah! You ever seen Man Vs Food?

  8. Paul   13 years ago

    Re: coverage for Homeopathy, naturopathy, acupuncture etc.

    It's concievable that these things could actually reduce costs--- although it's also possible they'll raise costs.

    The argument that they'll raise costs is of course, obvious: we have to pay for one more thing, and a thing that doesn't fucking work.

    The argument that they'll lower costs: If dumbasses are willing to spend $20 to have someone stick needles in them, it's a lot cheaper than paying $300 to have someone actually provide real healthcare-- which they probably didn't need in the first place.

    1. Voros McCracken   13 years ago

      Right. What you'd see is insurance companies voluntarily covering things like that because it's in their interest to do so. That's how the birth control thing spiraled out of control: many insurance companies were covering it happily because they calculated that it was a lot cheaper than paying for a pregnancy.

      It would be nice if Ala Carte health care was at least an option for those it makes sense for.

    2. Bobarian   13 years ago

      But if you get the government to pay for it, you can charge $300 for the shit that doesn't work.

  9. shrike   13 years ago

    Behindertsein ist sch?n

  10. ?   13 years ago

    Internet sensation Remy

    [chortle]

  11. WWNGD?   13 years ago

    That silly Remy trying to change the world through song... what will the little dickens think of next?

  12. Hooha   13 years ago

    Wild On E! was worth watching, back when Brooke Burke hosted. Granted, I don't really remember what the show was about...

  13. David Shellenberger   13 years ago

    The White House, perhaps missing the point, responded by ordering all Americans to buy pizza with a dozen healthy toppings selected by Michelle Obama.

  14. ClaraW   13 years ago

    Yum! Your pizza looks amazing!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!