Health care reform

52 Percent Favor Health Care Law's Community Rating; 76 Percent Oppose When Cuts to Quality Considered

|

New findings from the Reason-Rupe poll demonstrate weak support of the new health care law, which is likely driven by opposition to the individual mandate. However, other provisions in the law do enjoymajority support.

For instance, 52 percent favor the community rating provision, which prohibits health insurance companies from charging some customers higher premiums based on medical history or pre-existing conditions. However, when potential cuts to quality are considered, support flips and 76 percent oppose the provision.

The Reason-Rupe poll sought to provide realistic potential costs associated with the community rating provision to understand what costs Americans might be willing to accept in exchange for community rating.

Although a majority of Americans favor a community rating provision, support drops to 41 percent if increased wait times result, 38 percent if increased premiums result, and 37 percent if increased taxes result. Most strikingly though, opposition skyrockets to 76 percent if decreased health care quality results from the community rating provision.

Among those who favor the community rating provision, a majority continue to favor it if increased wait times result, 47 percent continue to favor if increased taxes result, and 46 percent continue to favor if increased premiums result. However, opposition also soars to 76 percent if decreased health care quality results from the community rating provision.

Polls typically ask about explicit provisions in the new health care law, such as the individual mandatethe employer mandatecommunity ratingguaranteed issue, and the medical loss ratio. However, they often fail to provide realistic potential costs associated with these provisions. This is essentially asking a person if they want a benefit without suggesting there is any associated cost.

When potential unintended costs are considered, favorability toward the Affordable Care Act's provisions becomes more nuanced. These data suggest community rating's benefits are popular when considered in isolation of costs. However, support declines when increased wait times to see a physician, increased premiums, increased taxes, or decreased health care quality are considered.

Full poll results found here.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted March 10th-20th of both mobile and landline phones, 1200 adults, margin of error +/- 3 percent. Columns may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. Full methodology can be found here

Emily Ekins is the director of polling for Reason Foundation where she leads the Reason-Rupe public opinion research project, launched in 2011. Follow her on Twitter @emilyekins.

Advertisement

NEXT: Do You Have a Free Speech Right to Heckle Athletes, Coaches, and Referees at Publicly Financed Stadiums?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. 100% of the people favor free stuff.
    Not so many when they find out it really isn’t free.

    1. 100% oppose stupid, misleading push questions.

  2. Yes, let’s go with demographically unstable presumptions… oh, wait, I’ll end up paying more?

  3. For instance, 52 percent favor the community rating provision, which prohibits health insurance companies from charging some customers higher premiums based on medical history or pre-existing conditions.

    Maybe someone should ask them whether it is OK for force insurance companies to sell fire insurance at their regular rate to someone whose house is on fire.

  4. ask them whether it is OK for force insurance companies to sell fire insurance at their regular rate to someone whose house is on fire.

    Of course it’s OK. If an insurance company is so heartless that they would not do that the Government has to step in.

  5. “Your insurance company wants to charge that annoying jerk at work, who’s always smoking, an extra premium for his health insurance to cover the dangers of smoking. Do you agree that
    the extra premium should be billed to you instead?”

    1. That hot ‘n’ slutty receptionist has a very active sex life and wants the very best contraception. Do you think you should help pay for it when she won’t even give you the time of day?

      What about her inevitable abortion; should you be sent part of the bill, even though you didn’t get any action at all?

      1. This may be the dumbest comment ever.

    2. The good news is that smokers are rated under Obamacare so your point is what?

  6. Behindertsein ist sch?n

  7. I wonder how many favor Obamacare if it means they will be dragged from their homes and beaten with sticks every night.

    Just a suggestion for the next push poll you guys want to do.

  8. And asked if they oppose it if their dog would get kicked all opposed it… Leading questions and assumptions like these that are simply scare tactics are nothing more than mental masturbation.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.