F.A. Hayek Died 20 Years Ago Today
This day in history: 20 years ago today, economist F.A. Hayek bit the dust. Reason interviewed the man himself in 1977, and re-ran that interview in honor of his death in 1992.
Read the whole thing, or enjoy some choice tidbits below, including some fine smack talk about rival John Maynard Keynes. Happily for Hayek (but unfortunately for us), he died believing the Keynes fad was fizzling. Two decades later, Keynesianism drove more than $800 billion in (failed) stimulus spending. The silver lining: A recent Reason-Rupe poll found that Americans are turning their backs on Hayek's rival.
Reason: Of your bestselling The Road to Serfdom, John Maynard Keynes wrote: "In my opinion it is a grand book…. Morally and philosophically I find myself in agreement with virtually the whole of it: and not only in agreement with it, but in deeply moved agreement." Why would Keynes say this about a volume that was deeply critical of the Keynesian viewpoint?
Hayek: Because he believed that he was fundamentally still a classical English liberal and wasn't quite aware of how far he had moved away from it. His basic ideas were still those of individual freedom. He did not think systematically enough to see the conflicts. He was, in a sense, corrupted by political necessity. His famous phrase about, "in the long run we're all dead," is a verv good illustration of being constrained by what is now politically possible. He stopped thinking about what, in the long run, is desirable. For that reason, I think it will turn out that he will not be a maker of long-run opinion, and his ideas were of a fashion which, fortunately, is now passing away.
And this:
Reason: Are you optimistic about the future of freedom?
Hayek: Yes. A qualified optimism. I think there is an intellectual reversion on the way, and there is a good chance it may come in time before the movement in the opposite direction becomes irreversible. I am more optimistic than I was 20 years ago, when nearly all the leaders of opinion wanted to move in the socialist direction. This has particularly changed in the younger generation. So, if the change comes in time, there still is hope.
Take a minute today and pour one out for fallen homies. Or watch this awesome Keynes v. Hayek rap video, which is basically the first quote above, but in rhyme.
Via Ryan Young.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"in the long run we're all dead,"
Over and over in videogames. And you're done when you run out of quarters.
Twenty years. I was still in college.
Thanks for making me feel old, Dead Hayek!
To make you feel older: I was in kindergarten.
Same here...
Remember Jack Weinberg's "never trust anyone over 30?"
I was over 30.
"honor of his death"
What kind of weirdo honors someone's death?
I could see honoring his life though.
The Japanese?
I actually thought it was wierd that KMW was honoring his death, and realized that I'd been doing that for all of my family members. It's like my mind builds in a firewall for white people vs yellow people.
You know who else died some years ago...
The world's most famous Keynesian vegetarian anti-smoking dog lover?
What does the picture of Col. Sanders have to do with Hayek?
Hayek loved him some fried chicken.
Also, fried chicken.
How about in the clubhouse?
Speaking of fried chicken. Of COURSE the NAACP is investigating the matter. There just HAS to be more to this than what we are seeing to milk for political gain.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....tions-2012
That version of the story doesn't have anything on the NAACP involvement. Here is a more complete one.
http://www.wral.com/news/state...../10893477/
I'm repeating myself, but I remember reading an online critique of Austrian economics, where it essentially posited that more than one car maker, more than one cell phone maker etc., represented duplication of effort, and therefore was an inefficient way of running an economy.
Why would anyone think that a unique condition of Austrian economics? Pure, unrefined ignorance? It is a critique of the market older than Marx, used to justify mercantilism actually, put to rest long ago.
Why would anyone think that a unique condition of Austrian economics?
As best as I can tell, it had something to do with the free, unordered nature of people pursuing wealth and engaging in unplanned economic activity.
As I recall, the critique didn't explicitly say this, but it did lay out a hypothetical, where people on an island yadda yadda were pursuing their own selfish goals instead of the goals of the group, and this would lead to "duplication of effort", waste an inefficiency.
The allegory was of course pointing to a modern capitalist economy where people, you know, did the same. So my only possible conclusion was that two car makers, two cell phone makers etc. = duplication of effort.
I wish we could bring Hayek back to life... so we could fucking murder him.
We have, metaphorically speaking.
All Power to the Imagination!
Wow has it really been 20 years? Wait what? Who is FA Hayek??
http://www.True-Privacy.tk
Yes, had Keynes only forseen how social democracy would enslave the serfs of Scadinavia, poor souls. What a load of shit The Road to Serfdom turned out to be.
Good post.You did a good work,and offer more effective imformation for us!Thank you.
http://www.hat-home.net/
http://www.hat-productions.com