Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Science & Technology

Fixing the Unbroken Internet

Lucy Steigerwald | From the May 2012 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In his May 1996 story "Code Blue," Rick Henderson considered the political urge to fix what wasn't broken on the Internet. By the mid-'90s, members of Congress were panicked enough about kids' ability to access a wide world of racy online content that they approved the Communications Decency Act (CDA). As Henderson noted, the law authorized "$250,000 fines and jail terms of up to six years for anyone who uses interactive computer networks to make 'indecent' language or pictures—the same material that makes Howard Stern an FCC target—available to minors."

The CDA threatened not just obscenity, a class of speech the Supreme Court has said is not protected by the First Amendment, but also perfectly legal material dealing with "sexual or excretory functions or organs." Under the new law, Henderson noted, a minor could buy Stern's book, Miss America, in a store, but "if that same youngster reads a profanity-laced quote from the book on the Internet [the person who posted it] could go to the slammer." In March 1997, the Supreme Court struck down the CDA's speech restrictions on First Amendment grounds. 

But Congress did not give up its quest to regulate content on the Net. Towards the end of 2011 the Internet was abuzz over two pieces of legislation: the House's Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Senate's variation, the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA). Both gave the government broad power to censor online content. Both were backed by business and entertainment groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Motion Picture Association of America. Initially it looked like they would easily pass. But a slew of online activists, with the help of tech giants like Google, Wikipedia, and Facebook, built an opposition united by concerns about the bills' power to blacklist Internet Protocol (IP) addresses and prevent search engines from listing websites suspected of hosting or linking to copyrighted material. 

The outcry against SOPA and PIPA culminated in a January 18 Web protest during which sites such as Wikipedia and Google blacked out all or part of their pages. Legislative support diminished, and SOPA's chief sponsor, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), shelved the bill, saying he needed to rework the legislation into something more palatable.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbats

Lucy Steigerwald is a contributing editor at Antiwar.com and previously worked as an associate editor at Reason.

Science & TechnologyInternetTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (2)

Latest

The American Revolution Was Fought With Muskets and Ink

Agustina Vergara Cid | 7.7.2026 3:00 PM

He Compared ICE's Chief to a Nazi, so ICE Tracked Him Down on Vacation With His Daughter

Tosin Akintola | 7.7.2026 1:56 PM

Europe, A.C., and the Housing Exception to America's Economic Success Story

Christian Britschgi | 7.7.2026 11:50 AM

The U.S. Could Eventually Win a Men's World Cup—With Enough Immigration and Capitalism

Jason Russell | 7.7.2026 11:20 AM

Trump's World Cup Intervention Shows His Sore Loser Philosophy

Matthew Petti | 7.7.2026 10:43 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason