Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Friday Funnies

Why Romney Won Michigan

Henry Payne | 3.2.2012 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Finders Keepers

Henry Payne
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (105)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Newt Paul   13 years ago

    "I disavow." Marriage contracts. Newsletters. Anything I sign.

    1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

      That's right. Keep digging at the newsletters. It's the only mistake Dr. Paul ever made, so it's all you've got!

      1. MANGO PUNCH   13 years ago

        Unbelievably unfunny.

      2. ThatSkepticGuy   13 years ago

        What about that period in his youth where Ron Paul religiously followed a pastor who preached virulently bigoted garbage and called for the use of violence as a means to an end?

        Oh, wait . . .

        1. Luap Nor   13 years ago

          Or the fact he basically did nothing his entire tenure in office...

          Except accept pork.

          1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

            *Citation needed

        2. Carston   13 years ago

          Ron Paul went to Reverend Wright's church too?

    2. Herp Derp   13 years ago

      Am I the only one that has noticed how easily Libertarians will not back a candidate if there is ONE thing they don't agree with? For instance, Ron Paul talks about legalizing drugs, stop empire building, free-market trade, decentralization of the monetary system, etc. These are ideas that Libertarians claim to agree with; However, he mentions "gold standard" or "preventing illegal immigration" (though, he supports the VISA program that Libertarians have brainstormed) and Libertarians FLIP THEIR LID.

      Yet, they fail to point out issues with a candidate such as Gary Johnson simply because he's running under the "Libertarian" flag. Does this not sound like "Republicans" and "Democrats".

      You see, this is why we can't have nice things. Aren't Libertarians suppose to be intelligent, competent, and reason(able)?

      1. Herp Derp   13 years ago

        Also forgot to add:

        Precious metals are universally accepted as trade (whether the government approves it as "currency" or not).

        Fiat money isn't, because it's just that, Fiat.

        Sorry guys, but facts are facts, no matter how much you wish it to be false.

  2. Joey Johns   13 years ago

    This may be the coolest thign I have ever seen dude. Wow.

    http://www.Went-Anon.tk

  3. The Art-P.O.G.   13 years ago

    I dig the art.

    1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

      Yeah, gotta give props to Payne here. He only needed to label one of his caricatures. And I slightly sniggered at the Newt line. So this is Friday Funnier-than-usual

      1. Maxxx   13 years ago

        He only needed to label one two of his caricatures.

        FIFY

        1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

          Well, I think the Newt one was recognisable without the label. The Rick one wasn't. So IMO he only needed to label one

      2. Almanian   13 years ago

        "sniggered"

        SRACIST!!!

  4. Comcast Sucks (Coxswain Hardy)   13 years ago

    Why the typewritten text? Did the editors add that because it needed moar text?

  5. sticks   13 years ago

    Redeye was nice. I usually make fun of idolizing dead celebs but I'll miss Andrew on tv/web/etc. Please Please people come up with funny jokes about his death! He deserves good laughs.

    1. WORK KILLS   13 years ago

      "Working more than 48 hours per week doubles the risk of cardiovascular disease."
      http://www.anxietyculture.com

      1. gaijin   13 years ago

        So high unemployment, a decreasing labor participation rate, and an increase in part tie workers are good things!

        1. Why Work?   13 years ago

          "We Don't Want Full Employment, We Want Full Lives!"

          Creating Livable Alternatives to Wage Slavery
          http://whywork.org/

          1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

            Having a full life is entirely up to the individual. It all depends on the what the individual values and the choices the individual makes.

          2. ThatSkepticGuy   13 years ago

            "Wage Slavery"

            Oxymoron. And a red herring.

            But since socialism is all about de facto slavery, I imagine that your issue is with the "wage" part.

            1. Slavery is Fibertarian   13 years ago

              Owning (controlling) humans (the ultimate resource), whether part-time (wage slavery) or full-time (chattel slavery) is the goal of all Capitalists.

              And turning people into mere property is the purpose of the "self-ownership" bait-and-switch bullshit with which Fibertards proselytize.

              Bait: you own yourself.
              Switch: Humans are mere property
              to consume, sell, rent, mortgage, transfer, exchange or destroy.

              Example of Fibertarian duplicity:

              Voluntary Slave Contracts
              by Walter Block [Austrian/libertarian economic scholar, Mises Institute]
              lewrockwell.com/block/block134.html

              1. What?   13 years ago

                If you can quit, you aren't a slave. Dumbass.

        2. MSM   13 years ago

          While a Democrat is President? Absolutely!

          1. Right Wing Authoritarian   13 years ago

            Get to work!

            "Once you begin turning all the land around you into cropland, you begin to generate enormous food surpluses, which have to be protected from the elements and from other creatures?including other people. Ultimately, they have to be locked up. Though it surely isn't recognized at the time, locking up the food spells the end of tribalism and the beginning of the hierarchical life we call civilization."

            "As soon as the storehouse appears, someone must step forward to guard it, and this custodian needs assistants, who depend on him entirely, since they no longer earn their living as farmers. A manager class soon emerged to look after the accumulation and storage of surpluses?something that had never been necessary when everyone was just working a few hours a day."

            ~Daniel Quinn

            1. Fluffy   13 years ago

              Gosh, I really hate those enormous food surpluses.

              1. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

                And the end of tribalism. Sure do miss shitting in a hole, fucking my cousin and killing outsiders

                1. William Walsh   13 years ago

                  My cousin was hot,

                2. ThatSkepticGuy   13 years ago

                  "And the end of tribalism. Sure do miss shitting in a hole, fucking my cousin and killing outsiders"

                  Don't forget Polio. God, how I miss Polio.

                  1. Polio=Disease of Civilization   13 years ago

                    "The earliest visible populations of prehistory nonetheless do surprisingly well if we compare them to the actual record of human history rather than to our romantic images of civilized progress."

                    Health and the Rise of Civilization
                    Mark Nathan Cohen
                    Yale University Press
                    http://www.primitivism.com/health-civilization.htm

                    Fibertards gonna fib.

                3. Agriculture=Killing Outsiders   13 years ago

                  "Warfare,immorality, vice, polygyny, slavery, and the subjection of women seem to be absent amongour gatherer-hunter ancestors."

                  The Origins of War
                  John Zerzan
                  http://www.scribd.com/doc/20298938/Ze.....ins-of-War

            2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

              tl;dr

              1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

                tl;dr: Agriculture bad. Starvation good.

                1. Agriculture = Frequent Famine   13 years ago

                  Hunter Gatherers don't have famines, Fibertard.

                  1. roystgnr   13 years ago

                    Even animal hunter gatherers frequently die of starvation, idiot.

                    1. Why is food under lock'n'key?   13 years ago

                      Myth #2: Agriculture creates a more stable and secure food supply.

                      If agriculture is a more difficult means of attaining food, at least it is more secure, no? Where a forager won't know if they will eat today or not, an agriculturalist can be assured she'll have food for the day. This, as it turns out, is also a false statement. In all but the most marginal environments, a gatherer has a near 100% chance of finding some form of plant food...

                      When Lee studied the Ju/'Hoansi in the Kalahari desert (2000), the region was in the midst of a severe draught. The neighboring Bantu farmers and pastoralists were dying by the thousands of starvation; the Ju/'Hoansi, however, were able to subsist very healthily on an average of two hours of foraging a day.

                      http://theanarchistlibrary.org.....heses.html

                    2. Brandon   13 years ago

                      Posting the same idiotic crap from a different website doesn't make it any more credible, Jason.

            3. Fat Indian   13 years ago

              By the way, I cut & paste this with one hand while stuffing the fifth free-range Twinkie of the morning in my mouth with a mocha latte chaser. Yeah, I'm that good. You libertard statists can't keep up with me, so don't even try.

              1. Andrew Briebart is Dead   13 years ago

                Twinkie boy.

        3. Old Soldier   13 years ago

          Only if you want to prolong the lives of the worthless.

          1. Worthless = Old Soldiers?   13 years ago

            "Atlas Shrugged" does in fact contain a gas chamber - the ghastly Winston Tunnel scene, where those who are unfortunate enough to hold the wrong philosophical premises get death by asphyxiation, their final moments approvingly illuminated by the torch of Randian justice.

            1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

              They got gassed because they put too much trust in authority and didn't take enough responsibility for their own lives.

              1. MNG   13 years ago

                That still makes it a pretty sick fantasy...She clearly is wishing death on "people like that" and thinks it will make her and those sympathetic to her ideas feel good. That's sick, notwithstanding Chamber's hysterical-ness about it all.

                1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

                  Or maybe it's a moral lesson. "Take responsibilty for your own life or something bad might happen to you!" We've been passing down lessons in this manner for as long as we've had language. Are you saying this method is always "sick"? Or is it only "sick" when Rand does it?

                2. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                  Fuck off slaver!

                  1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                    For MNG.

              2. THE RIGHT TO TAKE   13 years ago

                Is THE RIGHT TO TAKE part of your idea of "personal responsibility?"

                "[The Native Americans] didn't have any rights to the land ... Any white person who brought the element of civilization had THE RIGHT TO TAKE over this continent."

                ~Ayn Rand, US Military Academy at West Point, March 6, 1974

                P.S. Questions:
                ? Is the right to take a negative or positive right?
                ? Is the right of any white person an individual or collective right?

                1. Azathoth   13 years ago

                  What is hunting except taking? What is gathering except taking? Taking what one needs to live?

            2. MNG   13 years ago

              Rand is full of rather juvenile revenge fantasies in her work, but that's true of other writers too (think Dante).

              1. Juvenile revenge=Killing Field   13 years ago

                "Sweep aside those parasites of subsidized classrooms, who live on the profits of the mind of others and proclaim that man needs no morality, no values, no code of behavior." ~Ayn "POL POT" Rand

                Pol Pot and Ayn Rand both had the same genocidal fantasy: blow the whole thing up and start over.

                Pol Pot wanted to:?
                (a) "restart civilization"?
                (b) by cleansing civilization of liberal influences?
                (c)and punishing and starving out people he regarded as subhumans
                ?(d) at Year Zero.

                Ayn Rand wanted also to:?
                (a) restart civilization
                ?(b) by cleansing civilization of liberal influences?
                (c) and punishing and starving out people she regarded as subhumans?
                (d) with a wave of the dollar brand cigarette.

                Not much difference. But what else would you expect from a philosophical movement inspired by a serial child killer?

            3. Fluffy   13 years ago

              those who are unfortunate enough to hold the wrong philosophical premises get death by asphyxiation

              If there was a novel where SS soldiers accidentally wandered into one of their own gas chamers, a la some series of Final Destination accidents, and ended up asphyxiated, would you jump up and down about how that novel "included a gas chamber"?

              Whitaker Chambers was scum. It would be an ad hominem argument to say that since Whitaker Chambers was scum, we can know in advance that his moral arguments would be invalid, so we shouldn't say that - but it's very, very tempting.

              1. William Walsh   13 years ago

                It is amazing that Chamber's fantasy allusion/analogy which one would not of seen without looking for a smear somewhere! Anywhere! has hung around.

                It's absurd. Rand's opponents really need to find something else or STFU.

              2. Ayn   13 years ago

                I especially enjoyed killing the commie spawn in the sleeper berths.

              3. Irony Alert   13 years ago

                Whitaker Chambers was scum. It would be an ad hominem argument

                LULZ

            4. ThatSkepticGuy   13 years ago

              Your hysterical overworking of a piece of fiction certainly compares to the real-life murders of 100 million people in the name of collectivist idealism.

              1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

                *ding* and the man wins a cigar.

              2. invisible furry hand   13 years ago

                No, the fiction's worse - Ayn Rand didn't have the right motives, remember?

              3. Rands Collective RIGHT TO TAKE   13 years ago

                "[The Native Americans] didn't have any rights to the land ... Any white person who brought the element of civilization had THE RIGHT TO TAKE over this continent."

                ~Ayn Rand, US Military Academy at West Point, March 6, 1974

                P.S. Questions:
                ? Is the right to take a negative or positive right?
                ? Is the right of any white person an individual or collective right?

              4. American Indian Holocaust=REAL   13 years ago

                Millions of Native Americans slaughtered.

                You profit from it.

    2. sticks   13 years ago

      way to suck at making funnies. fuck.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Michigan voters don't understand economic policy, I get it. But why is that china-man in Newt's space suit.

    1. The Contract on NASA   13 years ago

      Per newtum ad astra.

    2. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

      So all fat people are china-men just because they have squinty eyes? There's a word for people like you!

      1. Almanian   13 years ago

        Observant?

    3. Apatheist ?_??   13 years ago

      The chinaman is not the issue here, dude.

    4. Loki   13 years ago

      Because the Chinese still have a space program?

  7. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    I'm a Michigan voter, but lack breasts and blond hair (and a purse).

    1. gaijin   13 years ago

      get a girlfriend 🙂

      1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        I have a wife - with black hair, too many purses and large breasts.

    2. Fluffy   13 years ago

      Michigan has nice tits but a tranny face.

      1. Some Dude   13 years ago

        If they're that big and that high, they've gotta be fake.

      2. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

        Everyone Payne draws has a tranny face. It's his style.

      3. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

        Rick's ribcage is nearly as ample.

        1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

          ah, make that Mitt.

          1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

            See, needed more labels.

  8. rather fart in a jar   13 years ago

    Why Romney Won Michigan

    He won the fart in a jar vote. CH4 to the White House!

  9. Fluffy   13 years ago

    We may look back on this election and wish we had voted in Newt if we can't use our Moon Colony as a base to destroy that 2040 asteroid.

    I note with interest that astronomers usually say "There's nothing to worry about" but this time are saying, "There's nothing to worry about, but maybe we should start thinking how we will move this thing". Hmmmmmm.

    1. MNG   13 years ago

      And note we are reducing our nuclear armory to the cries of the GOP. If we ever get a mass Armageddon style meteor problem boy that is going to make Obama look bad. I mean, even with 300 nukes you know those tight-assed Air Force guys will screw up on many of them, causing those happy-go lucky drillers to have to work harder to save the day.

      1. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

        They'll probably take a handgun with them too. We better ban those while we're at it.

        Only assault rifles should be allowed in space.

        1. Almanian   13 years ago

          "In space, no one can hear your AR....for lack of oxygen...SHIT!"

      2. Tim   13 years ago

        Realx MNG, Georgia has The Bomb

        http://www.tybeetyme.com/tb/index.htm

    2. cowardly commenter some guy   13 years ago

      A 1 in 625 chance of global catastrophe... That's definitely a RED cell on the risk assessment spreadsheet.

  10. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

    Rick Santorum is a blue collar valley girl?

    1. Rick Santorum   13 years ago

      OHMAGOD!!

  11. NotSure   13 years ago

    The Friday Funnies are so incredibly unfunny that they paradoxically start becoming funny.

  12. Ted Kennendy   13 years ago

    My own T-shirt was wet, but I don't remember how it got that way.

  13. Brian from Texas   13 years ago

    Nice ears on Ron Paul. Mr. Payne must have had a field day with Ross Perot 20 years ago.

    1. Bee Tagger   13 years ago

      It's the reason I bought a bigger monitor.

  14. rather   13 years ago

    I had no clue who the 'Rick' was; If you continue to use that likeness, I'd put his full name and SS number on his T-shirt too

  15. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    I get which ones are Santorum and Gingrich from the labels, but who are the other two?

    1. MNG   13 years ago

      Are you saying...you need more labels?

  16. rather   13 years ago

    Thanks to everyone for paying attention to me!!

  17. Ice Nine   13 years ago

    I had no clue who the 'Rick' was

    Probably because Payne's notion of Rick's signature sweater vest looks for all the world like a lumberjack shirt with rolled-up sleeves.

  18. RoboCain   13 years ago

    I must have no sense of rumor, because I never find these actually funny.

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      Read the Warning Label?:

      "Reason 'Friday Funnies' are not recommended for testing your sense of humor. Such testing should be conducted by professionals in a controlled environment, like Warty's basement, or something. But NOT using 'Friday Funnies'."

  19. Almanian   13 years ago

    I like how Payne has Christopher Knight (AKA "Peter Brady")playing Sanctimonioustorum in the first panel.

    I love me some Brady bunch!

    So C+!

  20. Jesus H. Christ   13 years ago

    Payne did a good job drawing Santorum's freakishly constricted mouth. That's how I knew it was "The Rick" even with the lumberjack shirt.

    This one wasn't any funnier than previous attempts, but it had more "stuff" in it.

  21. Joe   13 years ago

    1) Rick isn't wearing a seatbelt. Vying for the libertarian vote?

    2) Newt's so conservative he lactates oil. Vying for the libertarian vote?

    3) Romney wearing The Jacket. Vying for the libertarian vote?

  22. Jay S   13 years ago

    Reason's fraudulent title for this feature is making me doubt that it's even Friday.

  23. VoteFacts   13 years ago

    Check out this new fact checking website:

    http://www.VoteFacts.org

  24. jb   13 years ago

    i LIKE IT when i don't have to be clever to understand the funnies.

  25. coolke   13 years ago

    yes

  26. Coach Outlet   13 years ago

    http://www.coachoutletonlinepick.com/ Coach Outlet http://www.coachoutlettousa.com/ Coach Outlet online

  27. Coach Outlet   13 years ago

    http://www.coachoutletonlinepick.com/ Coach Outlet http://www.coachoutlettousa.com/ Coach Outlet online

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!