New Rasmussen Poll: 58 Percent Oppose $10,000 Subsidies to Electric Car Buyers
A recent Rasmussen poll finds 58 percent of Americans are opposed to providing $10,000 subsidies to those who buy electric cars. This is at odds with President Obama's recent budget proposal to provide $10,000 subsidies to Americans who purchase electric cars to offset the typical cost of $32,000-$42,000 per car. The President hopes that this policy endeavor will result in getting one million electric cars on the road by 2015.
Opposition to this policy increases to 65 percent when the total cost of the program ($10 billion dollars) is considered. 73 percent oppose allowing those making over $150,000 a year eligible for this subsidy. This is quite relevant given that General Motors CEO Dan Akerson reports the average Chevy Volt buyer makes $170,000 per year. Only 13 percent approve of a subsidy to this income group.
It remains unclear whether Americans oppose this subsidy policy because they believe the electric car industry can make money on its own. Although 58% oppose the subsidy, only 46% believe the electric car industry can make money without government subsidy. Instead, Americans seem to oppose the subsidy regardless of whether they believe the industry needs government subsidies to continue.
Partisan breakdowns reveal that Republicans oppose the subsidy 77 percent to 14 percent, but Democrats favor it 46 percent to 39 percent. Primary support comes from self-identified liberals with 63 percent favoring. In comparison 78 percent of conservatives and 53 percent of moderates oppose the subsidy.
Question Wording
Electric cars are more expensive than traditional cars, with base costs ranging from $32,000 to 42,000. A proposal has been made to give $10,000 government subsidies to the purchasers of electric cars. Do you favor or oppose government subsidies to encourage the purchase of electric cars?
29% Favor
58% Oppose
13% Not sure
The Obama administration hopes to have one million electric cars on the road by 2015. To reach that goal, the subsidy program could cost the federal government $10 billion. Do you favor or oppose having the federal government spend $10 billion over four years to subsidize the purchase of electric cars?
26% Favor
65% Oppose
10% Not sure
Should people who earn more than $150,000 per year receive a $10,000 grant from the government to reduce the cost of purchasing an electric car? Or should people who earn more than $150,000 a year pay for the full cost of the car themselves?
13% Yes, they should receive a $10,000 grant from the government
73% No, they should pay for the full cost of the electric car
14% Not sure
Will the electric car industry ever make money on its own or will it always require government subsidies to stay in business?
46% Electric care industry will make money on its own
28% Electric care industry will always require government subsidies
26% Not sure
Source: Rasmussen
The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on February 18-19, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A friend is planning on buying a Tesla (starting at $50,000) I really hope he gets the subsidy, he is excited about it. He works in the DC area, but not for the government and can not believe the rest of the country is having problems.
Instead of "electric car", please call them what they really are............."coal powered cars".
Apparently Americans are much smarter than liberals give them credit for! These cars are not ready for prime time. Anyone foolish enough to buy one ought not be subsidized by taxpayers. If electric cars were so awesome, people would gladly buy them without government subsidies. Until that time, please use my money for something else, or better yet let me keep it and spend it or save it as I like.
Ralph Lauren outlet
Christian Louboutin is the accessories brand for every super-chic fashionista.For women who love a beautiful christian louboutin sandals, the Christian Louboutin helped stilettos back into fashion in the world.
louboutin uk
Ralph Lauren
employers violated the Fair Labor Standards Act -- in part by pocketing gratuities equal to as much as 5 percent of nightly wine sales.
chaussure timberland
chaussures nike shox
If they would have asked me I would also be against any tax credits, period.
hermes sac constance Tissu fibreux moutons de ch?vre est proche, ? grain fin,hermes sac constance mince, de petits pores. Peau de mouton de ch?vre doux Pison, ? grain fin. Ce type de cuir utilis? pour fabriquer des v?tements, des gants et son chapeau hermes sac constance.
hermes sac cuir Le cuir des vari?t?s plus de mati?res premi?res, peaux d'animaux, peaux d'animaux sauvages.hermes sac cuir Tels que peau de vache, de ch?vre, agneau, mouton, porc, de cheval, et le cuir de kangourou, peau de reptile peau d'animal.
Les demandes sur papier des animaux sont plus larges, sont principalement les suivantes hermes sac cuir
hermes sac evelyne neuf Couche dermique dans l'?piderme, la structure fibrillaire gliale, ce qui repr?sente pour la peau ?paisse de 96%.hermes sac evelyne neuf Le cuir est le traitement de la couche du derme. La couche dermique est divis? dans la couche chauff?e et la couche r?seau. Couche temp?rature constante est d'environ 20% de la peau d'?paisseur de 50%, et en feuilles de ?paisseur de la peau hermes sac evelyne neuf.
hermes sac kelly prix de sa surface est g?n?ralement grains, compos? de fibres tr?s fines. hermes sac kelly prix R?ticul?e de la fibre de la couche ?paisse thermostat, serr? dans les mailles, dure, une ?paisseur d'environ l'?paisseur de la peau 50% ? 80%, mais en feuilles de peau incompatibles Bohou, comme plus ?pais hermes sac kelly prix.
hermes sac lindy La couche r?ticulaire est plus ?pais le cuir de la plus dure et plus durable.hermes sac lindy Dans le cortex par gliales fibrillaires fibres ?taient plus ?paisses, et le l?che, l'arrangement parall?le de l'?tat, plein de graisse entre les fibres du cuir au cours de ces couches doivent ?tre enlev?s hermes sac lindy.
hermes sac main Le cuir des vari?t?s plus de mati?res premi?res, peaux d'animaux, peaux d'animaux sauvages.hermes sac main Tels que peau de vache, de ch?vre, agneau, mouton, porc, de cheval, et le cuir de kangourou, peau de reptile peau d'animal.
Les demandes sur papier des animaux sont plus larges, sont principalement les suivantes:hermes sac main
hermes sac pas cher,www.hermesonsalebags.com
Yet he for you to confirm everyone incorrect
to chuc su kien gia re
I will be asked to do everything the best I think! Can read your blog with my own than I found too much difference! I admire you!
mai hien
The trouble with tolls is they never go away. I'm OK with a toll that sunsets when the bonds to finance the project road are paid off. Unfortunately, once the road's paid for, the toll just becomes another endless tax typically used for everything but road maintenance. - - ????? 2017
- ????? ??????