Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Orwellian Irony in the Extreme Double-Plus-Good Update: It's a fake!

Nick Gillespie | 2.7.2012 5:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Picture of the the day, courtesy the Twitter feeds of Libby Jacobson, Soren Dayton, and Radley Balko.

Update!: So it turns out the picture above is a photoshopped image. For a shot of the building's front, go here and here for an explanation.

And here's a 2007 story from the Daily Mail about the proliferation of closed-circuit TV cameras (CCTV) in Orwell's old neighborhood.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: DOJ Continues Investigation of Rupert Murdoch, Komen VP Resigns Over Planned Parenthood Flap, Obama Staffers Defend About-Face on Super PACs: P.M. Links

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Civil LibertiesScience & TechnologyTechnologySurveillanceDystopia
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (365)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Revel Mason   13 years ago

    Sometimes you just have to wonder dude.

    http://www.anon-puter.tk

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      You know it, Anon Bot

      1. lily   13 years ago

        looking for the bilover?"datebi.com" is a site for bisexual and bicurious singles and friends.Here you can find hundreds of thousands of open-minded singles & couples looking to explore their bisexuality.sign up for free.

      2. lily   13 years ago

        looking for the bilover?---datebi*cO'm--- is a site for bisexual and bicurious singles and friends.Here you can find hundreds of thousands of open-minded singles & couples looking to explore their bisexuality.sign up for free.
        "

        1. juris imprudent   13 years ago

          I don't think anon-bot rolls that way.

          1. Jumbie   13 years ago

            lily replying to anon-bot!

            Hah. Didn't they do an experiment recently where they had 2 AI's talk to each other?

    2. EDG reppin' LBC   13 years ago

      Anon Bot, when was the last time you contemplated the curve of your lover's neck? Or reminisced about the smell of the little bakery you found in Paris? Have you ever wondered what your life would be like if you had stayed in Austin, and accepted the department head position?

      1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

        Have you ever wondered what your life would be like if you had stayed in Austin, and accepted the department head position?

        But the things he was asked to do in exchange for that position . . . Sure, that salary would've bought all the mouthwash in the world, but nothing would've erased the memory of it.

        1. Abersouth   13 years ago

          Ewwwwww.

    3. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

      What happened to first? His bot posts were always witty and upbeat. His links always worked producing a most favorable pornbot experience. I miss him.

      1. first   13 years ago

        Nikola has come to us fresh from her home in the Czech Republic. When we say fresh, that's exactly what we mean.

        She is as refreshing as a light breeze at dawn. 18 year old Nikola has a fragile charm. She manages to be both mysterious and na?ve at the same time. This is a rare quality. Her photo assignments with us are the first major ones she has undertaken. Until now she has concentrated on her studies at a business academy. Very recently that she has come to see that her beauty is as much of an asset as her intelligence. Gradually she is becoming aware of how powerful her sexual aura is. She is looking forward to exploring it.

        Nikola is like a new-born colt. Awkward and stumbling at first, it quickly becomes a graceful and powerful creature that is full of passion. Nikola will be transformed. We can watch the amazing process unfold.
        http://www.hegre-art.com/models#action=show&id=221

      2. John Locke   13 years ago

        I'm sorry but Reason has developed a more advanced spam filter that blocks out posts with links in them and I didn't want to be a dick and post spam without a link. However, if it really matters that much to you here's one for old time's sake.

        Nikola has come to us fresh from her home in the Czech Republic. When we say fresh, that's exactly what we mean.

        She is as refreshing as a light breeze at dawn. 18 year old Nikola has a fragile charm. She manages to be both mysterious and na?ve at the same time. This is a rare quality. Her photo assignments with us are the first major ones she has undertaken. Until now she has concentrated on her studies at a business academy. Very recently that she has come to see that her beauty is as much of an asset as her intelligence. Gradually she is becoming aware of how powerful her sexual aura is. She is looking forward to exploring it.

        Nikola is like a new-born colt. Awkward and stumbling at first, it quickly becomes a graceful and powerful creature that is full of passion. Nikola will be transformed. We can watch the amazing process unfold.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

          YOU ROCK pornbot!

  2. CultOfPersonality   13 years ago

    DUH DUN DUN!

  3. Matt   13 years ago

    I believe you meant to credit Libby Jacobson.

    1. rather   13 years ago

      Look, you can't expect a libertarian magazine to spell a woman's name correctly; it was hard enough for to give a FEMUL at hat tip, and the good news is not one called her a cunt
      -yet

  4. Libertarian2   13 years ago

    Dammit. He only lived to be 47? Now I feel even worthlesser.

  5. RetardedDragon6009   13 years ago

    So, is Orwell laughing his ass off or spinning in his grave?

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      Why can't it be both?

      1. Orwell   13 years ago

        SIMGLMAO!

    2. Katherine Mangles Wards   13 years ago

      He's screaming at us "You all are a bunch of fucking pussies!!!!!" from the afterlife... Or whatever it is English people say that is equivalent.

  6. juris imprudent   13 years ago

    Or as my friend puts it, the universe is more full of irony than dark matter.

    1. Old Salt   13 years ago

      What's the old saying? The only thing more common than hydrogen is stupidity.

  7. Warty   13 years ago

    Now I'm very sad.

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      On the bright side, that camera is there for YOUR protection.

  8. Colonel_Angus   13 years ago

    Why is the sign way up there? He only lived in that one room or something? Its probably one of the "other" places, like naming a street after Martin Luther King, Jr. because he stopped by that one time.

    1. Almanian   13 years ago

      It's kind of like a Bok or Payne cartoon, isn't it? More questions than anything.

      Also - MOAR LABELS!

    2. Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave.   13 years ago

      Don't you otherize me!

    3. angus   13 years ago

      So the camera can get a clean angle on the face of any anarchist loving, potential terrorist who might look.

  9. AlmightyJB   13 years ago

    Just wait until attach laser guns to those things.

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      They're already equipped with SCORPION STARE for CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN. Or was it for AZORIAN BLUE HADES? Anybody remember?

      1. Almanian   13 years ago

        Epi, you magnificant BASTARD! Does it really matter? Really?

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          Of course it matters!

          The End of the World as We Know It: CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN. In essence, billions upon billions of humans doing what we do- thinking, imagining, calculating- is very bad for reality. Sufficient levels of belief in an entity, or calculations related to an entity, can summon it from one of the countless parallel (and... not so parallel...) universes where an iteration of it exists. In the best of times, the ability to do so is generally offset by the difficulty. However, a roughly 70-year period is coming very soon- and probably has already begun- during which... well, during which the stars are right. CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN is predicted to be bad enough that an all-out nuclear war was considered, in order to reduce the population and thus the chances of summoning something big and hungry. However, the sheer number of deaths would almost certainly attract equally unpleasant creatures- and that's assuming that nobody dedicates the deaths to their favorite gibbering horror.

          1. Trespassers W   13 years ago

            Any word on the next Laundry novel?

            WAIT WAIT WAIT I just came up with the best idea.

            Laundry MMPORPG.

            There, now if anyone does it they owe me $1M.

            1. Episiarch   13 years ago

              Here you go.

              1. Gojira   13 years ago

                I had never heard of that series before. Now I hate you.

                1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                  Charles Stross is very good, Jimbo. Try him.

              2. Trespassers W   13 years ago

                *squee*

                1. Trespassers W   13 years ago

                  (That was in response to Epi, not Gojira.

                  Although I also squee at your hate, which nourishes my spirit.)

                  1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                    This year we get the next Laundry novel, and then next year the sequel to Saturn's Children. I am pleased.

                    1. Gojira   13 years ago

                      Yeah that's why I hate you; it's another fucking series that looks right up my alley that now I'm going to have to start, resulting in even less time to re-read my Beverly Cleary collection.

                    2. Trespassers W   13 years ago

                      Gojira, they're fun and relatively short, so you can get back to Superfudge soon. Don't skip the novelettes.

            2. Brett L   13 years ago

              Trespassers:

              They have a paper and dice game already. But holy shit, I would be come a non-bathing, catheter-wearing shut-in if they came out with a Laundry MMORPG

              1. Trespassers W   13 years ago

                Yeah, I accidentally discovered that fact today. Apparently it's based on CoC rules... Duh.

  10. Normal Person   13 years ago

    I am not oppressed by the presence of CCTV cameras. One has no right not to be looked at in public. People surrender their privacy, willingly, when they open a Facebook or Twitter account. Are Facebook and Twitter "Orwellian"?

    1. TELLMOFF   13 years ago

      A right is a recognized freedom. I wish that Americans would recognize more people's rights and not trust the ruling class to make those decisions for them.

    2. 0x90   13 years ago

      "One has no right not to be looked at in public."

      Because you said so?

      1. Normal Person   13 years ago

        No.
        Do you think you have a right not to be looked at in public?
        I'd like to see you try to prove that premise.

        1. 0x90   13 years ago

          I don't recall having advanced a position. You, however, implicitly state that you do have a right not to be looked at in private, by way of explicitly claiming the opposite right in the public case. I was only curious if you have any rationale for this, which goes beyond "because I said so."

    3. Non-cowardly person   13 years ago

      People have a choice to open a Facebook or Twitter account.

      1. Normal Person   13 years ago

        Correct. And other people have a right to look at you in public.

        1. Cop   13 years ago

          Correct. And other people have a right to look at you in public.

          Incorrect.

    4. Sam Grove   13 years ago

      Unless you get cited for loitering for standing on a public sidewalk talking to your friends.

    5. cynical   13 years ago

      "One has no right not to be looked at in public. "

      But should the government have the authority to look at everyone, all the time, in public?

      Don't get me wrong -- I'm sympathetic to Brin's view that increasing sousveillance is more useful than attacking surveillance. But that's an even harder fight in many ways, and absent a violent revolt, the public has much less ability to take action on whatever information it does acquire about state malfeasance.

      1. EscapedWestOfTheBigMuddy   13 years ago

        If we're going to go with Brin's approach we need to start seeing cameras on government officials too. Ones they can't arrange to have "malfunction" when they want and we must have a solid understanding in law that we do get to surveil them at least as much as they get to surveil us.

        Sauce for the goose and all.

        But in this case, that's not what we have.

  11. DHS   13 years ago

    I don't get it.

    1. Kerberos   13 years ago

      George Orwell wrote the book 1984 about a future society where everyone was under survillance for "the good of society", thus having a ccw camera on his house is abit hilarious.

      1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        I'd bet, even though Orwell is long-dead, he's still shitting himself over how his ficticious novel has become a guidebook for public policy.

        1. fish   13 years ago

          I'm glad you said it! If he had just kept it all to himself those empty head statists wouldn't have had a plan to follow!

          1. Normal Person   13 years ago

            I wonder how many people here think Animal Farm is anti-socialist. I'd bet at least 90%.

            1. BigT   13 years ago

              WTF do YOU think

      2. Innocuously Anonymous   13 years ago

        Irony: DHS does get it and Kerboros doesn't. Think about it, K.

      3. Tulpa   13 years ago

        Everyone was under surveillance in every corner of their homes via a viewscreen that would also issue commands to them.

        So, somewhat different from a camera viewing a public space.

        1. Normal Person   13 years ago

          Yup. Not that many "libertarians" are capable of discerning the difference.

          1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

            Yes, cameras are MUCH less intrusive. Thanks for pointing that out.

            1. Tulpa   13 years ago

              Not sure if sarcastic or trolling.

              1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                Sacrcastic

                1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

                  Or sarcastic.

        2. Paul   13 years ago

          And now that it's so easy to accept cameras in public spaces, it's much easier pushing them into private spaces.

          http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab.....ate-homes/

          1. Tulpa   13 years ago

            From your link:

            UPDATE: Further research shows that the Express didn't quite have all its facts straight. This scheme is active, and the numbers are fairly accurate (if estimated), but the mentions of actual cameras in people's homes are exaggerated. The truth is that the scheme can take the most troublesome families out of their homes and move them, temporarily, to a neutral, government-run compound. Here they will be under 24-hour supervision. CCTV cameras are not specifically mentioned, not are they denied, but 24-hour "supervision" certainly doesn't rule this out from the camera-loving Brits.

            Which is a long way of saying "we swallowed a bunch of bullshit hysteria and printed it anyway".

            One of the dangers of blurring the distinction between public space and private space, as many so-called "privacy advocates" love to do, is that when the push to expand surveillance does come it will mean less resistance since "it's all the same anyway".

            qv "libertarians" refusing to vote because Romney is just as bad as Obama.

      4. Paul   13 years ago

        George Orwell wrote the book 1984 about a future society where everyone was under survillance for "the good of society", thus having a ccw camera on his house is abit hilarious.

        You got trolled. His handle was Department of Homeland Security, aka DHS.

  12. ?   13 years ago

    Blogger Makes List of Suckers He Knows

  13. GILMORE   13 years ago

    i suspect banksy involvement =

    http://igargoyle.com/archives/cctv2.jpg

  14. Trespassers W   13 years ago

    Brain = asploded

  15. Applederry   13 years ago

    How to deal with Big Brother.

    1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

      If only our future could be so sitcom-y.

    2. GILMORE   13 years ago

      that was awe-tastic

      really.

  16. Bomb Everyone   13 years ago

    Questionable picture, since his real name was Eric Blair and I'd imagine that's the name they'd put on his home.

    Funny, anyway.

  17. Jumbie   13 years ago

    This has actually happened before, in Spain.

    http://farm2.staticflickr.com/.....946e_z.jpg

    1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      Orwell sure got around, didn't he?

  18. Res Publica Americana   13 years ago

    If this is Limetree Island, it's not at all surprising anymore. That realm is a lost cause.

  19. lily   13 years ago

    looking for the bilover?---datebi*cO'm--- is a site for bisexual and bicurious singles and friends.Here you can find hundreds of thousands of open-minded singles & couples looking to explore their bisexuality.sign up for free.
    "

  20. dale   13 years ago

    It's photoshopped. This photo made it to the front page of reddit today. At the top of the comments was another party pooper who posted this undoctored photo of the building: http://knowledgeoflondon.com/images/orwellw11.jpg. Sorry, guys.

    1. dale   13 years ago

      sorry, here's a working link: http://knowledgeoflondon.com/images/orwellw11.jpg

      1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        Though with all of the cameras they have there, it might be worth checking out the angles where Orwell really did live. Bet there's a camera somewhere near by.

        1. Tulpa   13 years ago

          That's right, dude. Don't let the point of this post being total bullshit get in the way of spreading hysteria.

          1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            What hysteria? What the hell are you talking about?

      2. The Gullible   13 years ago

        Pwnd again! Stupid reason.com!

      3. Paul   13 years ago

        That's because the camera is inside the home.

        http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/.....ghbours.do

        The CCTV devices, fitted inside properties but trained on the streets, are permitted under anti-terrorist laws and are being used to gather evidence of anti-social behaviour.

        1. Tulpa   13 years ago

          And Paul graces us with another misleading link intro. Not sure if he just isn't reading the content at the links or figures no one will call him on the incongruence.

          The cameras are installed at the request of the owners of the property they're installed in. Most of whom have been victims of vandalism and such.

          1. Mean Girl   13 years ago

            But, still! Cameras! In homes!

  21. I can tell from the pixels.   13 years ago

    Fake. It is a photoshop from 2008.

  22. Tulpa   13 years ago

    Right, because cameras in public places = viewscreens.

  23. Jackson, Dayton and Balko   13 years ago

    Boy, are our faces red!

  24. SouthernAnCap   13 years ago

    Hey Reason, I like posting y'all's stuff on my Facebook page, but the preview shows the entire URL. Do you think y'all could change that so that the headline and maybe a picture shows up instead?

  25. Wynn Ray   13 years ago

    I knew it was photoshopped when I saw a half-face in the texture of the colored reflection on the window.

    1. wylie   13 years ago

      It's a streetlight.

      1. Almanian   13 years ago

        IT'S A COOOOOKBOOOOOOOOK!!!!!1!!!1!

    2. mr simple   13 years ago

      It's a g-g-g-g-g-ghost!

      Oh wait. No, it's just a regular ghost.

  26. Tulpa   13 years ago

    So, Gillespie has to know by now that this image is a fake.

    Yet, hours later, there is no correction/update/apology.

    1. Katherine Mangles Wards   13 years ago

      one note tune

      1. Katherine Mangles Wards   13 years ago

        Well, actually 3 notes:

        1. "Ya'll Libertarians is cray-zay"
        2. "by the way, vote for my guy, NotObama"
        3. "I demand accountability from Reason.com. Raaaagghh!!!"

      2. Tulpa   13 years ago

        If you guys didn't keep falling prey to the same fallacies, I wouldn't keep correcting you with the same correction.

        1. Mean Girl   13 years ago

          I think it's called "confirmation bias."

          See also "Marionette-Puppet Disorder (MPD)"

  27. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  28. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  29. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  30. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  31. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  32. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  33. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  34. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  35. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  36. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  37. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  38. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  39. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  40. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  41. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  42. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  43. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  44. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  45. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  46. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  47. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  48. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  49. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  50. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  51. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  52. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  53. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  54. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  55. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  56. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  57. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  58. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  59. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  60. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  61. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  62. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  63. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  64. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  65. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  66. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  67. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  68. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  69. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  70. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  71. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  72. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  73. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  74. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  75. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  76. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  77. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  78. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  79. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  80. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  81. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  82. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  83. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  84. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  85. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  86. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  87. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  88. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  89. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  90. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  91. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  92. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  93. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  94. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  95. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  96. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  97. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  98. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  99. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  100. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  101. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  102. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  103. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  104. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  105. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  106. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  107. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  108. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  109. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  110. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  111. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  112. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  113. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  114. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  115. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  116. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  117. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  118. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  119. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  120. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  121. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  122. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  123. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  124. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  125. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  126. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  127. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  128. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  129. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  130. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  131. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  132. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  133. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  134. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  135. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  136. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  137. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  138. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  139. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  140. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  141. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  142. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  143. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  144. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  145. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  146. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  147. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  148. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  149. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  150. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  151. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  152. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  153. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  154. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    It's a faaaaake!

  155. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  156. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  157. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  158. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  159. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  160. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  161. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  162. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  163. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  164. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  165. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  166. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  167. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  168. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  169. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  170. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  171. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  172. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  173. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  174. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  175. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    Your post (#2825159) has been marked as spam by a third-party spam filter. If this is a mistake, please email webmaster@reason.com.

  176. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  177. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  178. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  179. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  180. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  181. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  182. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  183. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  184. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  185. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  186. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  187. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  188. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  189. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  190. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  191. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  192. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  193. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  194. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  195. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  196. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  197. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  198. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  199. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  200. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  201. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  202. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  203. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  204. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  205. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  206. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  207. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  208. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  209. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  210. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  211. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  212. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  213. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  214. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  215. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  216. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  217. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  218. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  219. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  220. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  221. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  222. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  223. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  224. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  225. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  226. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  227. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  228. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  229. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  230. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  231. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  232. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  233. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  234. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  235. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  236. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  237. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    http://reason.com/blog/2012/02.....nt_2825180

  238. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  239. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  240. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  241. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  242. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  243. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  244. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  245. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  246. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  247. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  248. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  249. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  250. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  251. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  252. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  253. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  254. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  255. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  256. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  257. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  258. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  259. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  260. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  261. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  262. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  263. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  264. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  265. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  266. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  267. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  268. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  269. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  270. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  271. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  272. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  273. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  274. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  275. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  276. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  277. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  278. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  279. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  280. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  281. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  282. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  283. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  284. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  285. Senator Vreenak   13 years ago

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  286. Sanjuro Tsubaki   13 years ago

    There is no camera on that block on Portabello Rd. There has never been a camera on that block of Portabello Rd. Anyone who says different is a spy from EastAsia.

  287. big faucet   13 years ago

    That does not change the story that the image is photoshopped. A lot of Orwell's ideas have been fully implemented these days. Even a couple more.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!