Romney "Clarifies" Statement About Poors, Obama Administration Announces Afghanistan Wind-Down, Egyptians Love Soccer to Death: P.M. Links

|

NEXT: ObamaCare's Unhealthy Expansion of Federal Power

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

    1. You should get a prize.

      1. Bi or want to find people having the same sexual orientation?—datebi*cO’m— is a safe and free site for you.

        1. Can you take a check? I’m very poor.

  1. Comment from AM Links:
    Marshall|2.1.12 @ 9:51AM|#

    Because without those children being educated and able to support themselves they’d probably be addicted to drugs breaking down your door in the middle of the night trying to take whatever they can get from your house to pawn off somewhere.

    Not to mention how a proper education helps them to either buy from you or provide for you. Something that they could never be capable of doing if it was left to parents alone.

    Children being educated.

    It’s a good thing they’re not getting addicted to drugs and breaking down your door…yet.

    1. Dekaney? They’re getting warehoused, not educated.

    2. This must be the class where they learn how to behave in the Walmart or Target line the morning after Thanksgiving. Next week, they’ll learn how to apply for Welfare, food stamps, Section 8, and disability payments so they’ll have something to spend after they’re done kicking the crap out of each other in the doorway of Brawl-Mart.

  2. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,59963,00.html

    Non custodial moms more likely to be deadbeats than single dads.

    1. I used to handle child support cases. I did not do statistics on them, but it seemed they were at least just as likely.

      1. It makes sense. But it doesn’t mean what people might think it does. The system is skewed against men. That means a woman has to be a real deadbeat usually to lose her kids. Whereas a man can be a really good parent and still not get the kids. The rule usually is, the mom gets them as long as there is nothing wrong with her no matter how good the dad is.

        So that means the pool of noncustodial mothers is generally populated by the real deadbeats. And the pool of noncustodial fathers is more representative of fathers as a whole.

        1. The system is bad for innocent people with deadbeats, too. Either sex. It takes loads of court time to get anything done. Only the attorneys benefit.

          1. The attorneys and sociopaths who really want to fuck their exs and children along with them.

            1. It amazes me what the system allows.

        2. True, but that is starting to change a bit in the courts. At a certain age, the child can make the determination of which parent they will live with. I’m sure it varies from state to state.

          You probably would not believe the amount of information a child support worker has at their fingertips. I could just type away on my computer to find out how much a person makes, where they work, what their phone number is, and where they live all based on required information from utility services and employers. Scary, really, but I had to use it to do my job.

          1. I am not surprised. So much for privacy.

        3. Tell me about it.

          My first lawyer told me that if I had done the things my wife did to the kids, I would be only getting supervised visitation.

          As it is, the GAL wanted to give the kids to my ex anyway, because her therapist was afraid my ex would hurt herself if she didn’t get the kids.

          I don’t have anything to do with the fathers’ rights movement, because they make Libertarian activists (party, officials) look well adjusted in comparison. The broken and tortured souls in the movement are not wrong about the biases against men…

          1. It is just horrible. I have a friend from high school who is a divorce attorney. The stories he tells are just heartbreaking.

          2. the GAL wanted to give the kids to my ex anyway, because her therapist was afraid my ex would hurt herself if she didn’t get the kids.

            W..T..F..?

          3. because her therapist was afraid my ex would hurt herself if she didn’t get the kids.

            Oh yeah. Give the kids to her. Great idea. That’ll make her totally better. *kaff*Andrea Yates*kaff*

            Jesus on toast points.

          4. That’s fucked up about the therapist. I thought the primary concern in determining custody was the welfare of the children, not the parents.

            1. I can’t really talk about the particulars – the behavior of mental health experts and social workers was nothing short of shocking. They did my ex no favors in trying to shield her from the consequences of her disordered behaviors.

  3. Fuck both of them:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new…..-1.1014754

    1. Bloomburg and Mumbles Menino. Well if history is any indication, there is a good chance Menino, like Masshole politicians, will end up in federal prison. So there is that.

    2. My hatred for Bloomberg has risen to Schumer-like levels at this point.

  4. Women take rejection well:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new…..d-sex.html

    1. Looking at the pairs’ mugshots, I will take the pliers thank you.

    2. Hooray! Not Florida. Its always Florida with this crazy shit.

  5. White Trash On Wheels:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs…..tible.html

    1. At least she has good taste in cars.

      1. I still think it’s ridiculous that an “SL” weighs 4,233 pounds.

  6. Charlize Theron is still hot:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs…..shoot.html

    1. She is all kinds of hot. Damn!

      1. Remember when she was all fat and ugly to win the Oscar? Glad to see she’s back to normal.

        1. I remember reading a great rant about that around the time she won her Oscar. It was a woman complaining that ugly actresses were not even allowed to play ugly characters anymore.

          1. I remember when lesbians protested Basic Instinct.

    2. Wow. And she isn’t 18 anymore. she has to be in her mid 30s. And still looks that good.

    3. The 19-year-old woman who works the counter at the Wendy’s in Brooklyn Center is prettier.

      1. Stick it in her pooper?

  7. I could not care less about unions, and I’m all for sticking it to ’em. However, I don’t really like the fact that the government can basically nullify certain provisions of contracts between businesses and unions… such as requiring every employee of a certain class to join the union. Don’t want to join the union? Don’t work for that company.

    1. Why should I have to join a union if my employer doesn’t require it? I work for my employer not the union.

      1. What if your employer does require it? Right to work laws prevent that.

        I understand the reason for these laws because the system is so rigged for the Unions and it is nowhere close to a free market but Right to Work is not free market either.

        1. RTW is just trying to right one wrong with another. No good at all.

    2. In this situation the government has already intervened: the business was required to deal with the union in the first place, so the contract was never freely agreed.

  8. The Planned Parenthood funding is a waste of donor funds; PP neither has the equipment, nor the interest in cancer prevention.

    I’m pro-choice but the Komen deal was a scam; they only ever did referrals.

  9. I’m not a Romney supporter by any means, but he wouldn’t have had to clarify shit if the media had used the whole damn quote. Way to continue the class war assholes.

    1. I wish he had said, “I don’t give a rat’s ass about poor people. They’re lazy and — let’s be honest here, Soledad — kind of gross.”

      He’d have won my vote.

  10. Susan G. Komen still under fire for cutting ties with Planned Parenthood.

    Yeah, the wailing is all over my FB feed. Jebus fuck, don’t make me unfriend you just to shut you the fuck up about this.

    1. JW, why don’t you love tits?

    2. I actually do think this is stupid, because Planned Parenthood provides a ton of healthcare to women who would otherwise be underserved and seems like just the kind of provider you would want to support if you wanted to help poor women get breast cancer screening. For many of these women Planned Parenthood is a primary care provider (and that has nothing to do with their abortion services, aside from, yes, the fungibility of money).

      But then one of my Twitter follow-ees linked to a story on some stupid Gawker Media site about how Komen won’t support PP but will support pink guns for breast cancer awareness and DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY WOMEN ARE KILLED BY THEIR INTIMATE PARTNER WITH A GUN EVERY YEAR OMG. And I was like, kill me.

      1. INTIMATE PARTNER

        made even more priceless by its placement in that imagined rant.

      2. Name one that does mammograms in house

        1. Dumbass, they provide breast exams and referrals for mammograms.

          A digital mammography machine can run $500K-$750K. Maybe you can donate one to PP so then you could STFU.

          1. Can’t swordfight with armless man
            -sorry

      3. I blame lesbians.

    3. You can block someone from your feed without unfriending them.

      1. Yes, I know, but that gets tiresome.

    4. This just screams “mission creep” all around.

  11. Panetta: U.S. to end “combat role” in Afghanistan in 2013.

    FTA: “Panetta said on Wednesday that American forces would step back from a combat role there as early as mid-2013”

    See any difference? Come on, Mike. The bullet should read more like: U.S. to maintain “role” in Afghanistan well beyond 2013.

  12. BTW, Komen is notorious for wasting money; they donated to red cross for 911; I guess tits were hurt in the terrorist attack

    1. LOL. That is really funny rather.

  13. Seventy-three dead in Egytpian soccer riot.

    Did you mean callipygian soccer riot?

  14. The Komen/planned parenthood rather serpentines with Starbucks and gun rights

  15. “Beware the Danger of the Super Bowl Bladder Infection”

    http://jezebel.com/5881117/bew…..-infection

    1. WTF is it and you’re ‘Jezebel id?e fixe’
      -Get laid asshole

    2. However, most of the time the commercials are the best part of the Super Bowl, so we have seen people who have to come in and have a catheter put in to relieve themselves.

      As opposed to, say, just watching on a portable device?

      As Stossel would say, “Give me a break!”

      1. Even beyond that, you can go to a place like Hulu and watch the commercials TODAY, no need to wait.

        Why anybody would do that is beyond me but that is where we are today.

    3. Depends. They’re not just for people with bladder control problems.

  16. Check out the comments on this one (and remember it’s a moderated site, imagine what didn’t get through):

    http://www.policeone.com/polic…..g-mistake/

    It’s astounding how many cops there think that posession (not even brandishment) of a pocket knife and running away justify lethal force.

    1. Holy shit bags, why did I do what you said?

  17. onetime I was counting a piggy bank but before I got to one hundred I got real tired and fell asleep.

    1. You’re like the worst spoofer ever.

  18. “Other survey questions were equally ambiguous. Participants were asked if they had ever had sex because someone pressured them by “telling you lies, making promises about the future they knew were untrue?” All affirmative answers were counted as “sexual violence.” Anyone who consented to sex because a suitor wore her or him down by “repeatedly asking” or “showing they were unhappy” was similarly classified as a victim of violence. The CDC effectively set a stage where each step of physical intimacy required a notarized testament of sober consent.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..story.html

    1. Yeah, we tore that one apart here when it first hit. Also included in “rape” (not even sexual assault, but full blown rape) was unwanted digital penetration even if it stopped when asked. In other words, if you’re making out with your wife, start inching your hand into her panties, and she says “not now” and you remove your hand, that meets their definition.

      1. Only if penetration actually occurred. So, if you kind of, you know got started and she said, “Not now”, then it’s the prison train for you.

    2. Wow, I missed that. It’s like bringing back breach of promise, only this time, let’s call it rape!

      It’s now sexual assault every time your boyfriend breaks up with you, basically.

    3. “telling you lies, making promises about the future they knew were untrue?”

      Wait, fuck that… so I’m a victim of sexual violence!

    4. I love the “showing they were unhappy” bit. If you don’t smile and laugh through the dry spell, you’re a rapist.

      Can we finally drop all this pretense and just say that anything a woman doesn’t like is rape? That’s what they’ve been pushing as long as I’ve been alive.

      1. What am I in for? Well, I started crying when my girlfriend said “no.”

  19. “Mitt Romney clarifies his statement that he is “not concerned about the very poor.””

    If one reads the entire quote, clarification isn’t required.

    Fuck the god damned media.

    1. The twittersphere was very concerned.
      I understand there was a “firestorm.”

  20. This is pretty good. Apparently the new definition of discrimination is “not providing an extra empty office for”.

    http://jezebel.com/5880943/wer…..nant-women

    1. This line fails at sarcasm:

      “Women should have thought about all the possible awful things that could have happened to them before they decided to try to get out of doing hard work by growing another human being inside of their bodies for 9 months and then pushing it out of a tiny, stretchable hole filled with nerve endings over a series of several hours.”

      1. It makes sense if you realize that most of them fervently deny that a woman’s (but not men’s) actions have consequences.

        For retards like that, it’s probably hilarious.

  21. Police so used to giving favors to others of the ruling class, they do it even when told not to.

    http://www.policeone.com/patro…..-lawmaker/

    1. You just made me think about sex when I had been thinking about something else.

      Rapist!

  22. Seventy-three dead in Egytpian soccer riot.

    How does that compare to the last British or Scottish soccer riot?

  23. Don Cornelius is still dead.

    1. Word…and that is some bullshit right there. Damn I used to love me some Soul Train… ahem…Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuulllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Train when I was a kid…

  24. Police Chief trys to take on a whole hot tub full of underlings. Gets all retalitory when no one takes her up on it.

    http://calcoastnews.com/2012/0…..-officers/

    1. Damn. I spent a few weeks in the Paso Robles/SanLuis area years ago. Beautiful country. I’m glad I didn’t get pulled over there though.

      Could she have been the inspiratiin for the zecond verse of “Sir Psycho Sexy?”

  25. Mitt Romney clarifies his statement that he is “not concerned about the very poor.”

    So now Reason joins ABC News and the rest of the MSM in ripping that quote out of context to beat up Romney.

    If I didn’t know better I’d think Riggs was in the tank for BO too. And I’m not sure I do know better, as a matter of fact.

    1. 4th graders have fights over pudding that are more measured and mature than our politics today. It is fucking disgusting already.

    2. Look, Romney also reiterated today that he supports automatic hikes in minimum wage. Which to me says that, yes, he’s not concerned about the very poor, he’s concerned about the people above them. Minimum wage is bad for the very poor, good for some skilled workers (and good for rich kids who want more unpaid internships I think.)

  26. Want to thank all of you, for your Powerfull stand against Oboma & His Corrupted political partners.

    But there is so much more we can do. Being aggressive and focusing on the facts and truth is only the first step.

    We musT follow Up with more details standing by our convictions and dont back down.

    Oboma has NOT brought CHANGE, In fact ~! ~ THE ONLY real THING needing CHANGE !….Was Barack Hussein Obama II.

    HIMSELF

    Barack Hussein Obama II (

    Who hates American Values ) who is A ” SELF PROCLAIMED Enemy” ~of responsible, Morally Conscious HARD WORKING Americans.

    oBOMAS Irresponsible & DRUG MAFIA and reckless supporters KNOW~ that Barack Hussein Obama II, WILL FORCE YOU to paY THEM, out of your PockeT .{ FOR all of their UNCHECKED Vices and THRILLS/

    { All on YOU

    | / At

    your COST & Sacrifice.\ …This UN~CHANGABLE fraud, has done His VERY BEST to Inspire VIOLENCE.

    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. saying ……To his supporters.Saying “Get ready for hand-to-hand combat with your Fellow Americans” ? Obama has ALSO DECLARED to his Supporters. “I want all Americans to get in each others faces!? Obama Demands !

    “You bring a knife to a fight pal, we’ll bring a gun” ?

    THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. ANGER VIOLENCE And more taxes….. THIS IS OBAMAS Change for america /”Hit Back Twice As Hard”. He commands ! *Obama on the private sector: ~~ “We talk To these folks?~ / so I know whose a*$ to KICK.” OBOMA wants to KICK your a*$ /“`

    Shouting THAT Republican victory would mean ~ “hand to hand combat” and HE IS EXPECTING people to be on Edge and ON BORDERLINE killing MODE, “ VIOLENT / and STAND and STOMP and MOB for their immoral CAUSES and THIS IS WHAT HE LIVES FOR ./ ./ ./ THESE ARE OBAMAS OWN WORDS.. !* Obama Tells democrats: ” I’m itching for a fight.” !

    ….PLEASE…. go to reXes NEW WebsiTe ~ ! Oboma *( Just like Adolf Hitler~~\oBOMA~~~ Demands ! — [ THE FINAL SOLUTION – for Un~Wanted Children

    Barak Obama is A MURDERER .~Torturing UNWANTED babys on DEATH ROE.

    CLICK HERE http://obomlnation.webstarts.com/index.html

    OBAMA TAKES a little NEW BORN innocent child, BORN ALIVE sTabS it iN the head and SUCKs ITS BRAINS OUT.

    This is just too wrong and horrible. Please stand for Loving Children and the USA.

    Respectfully and Thankfully Thank you ALL for your Time.

    To see HORRIBLE HONOR Killings~` HATE CRIMES ]`~ ! eXecuted by the CLINTON,RENO and ATF Media WHO COMMITTED H0NOR KILLINGs [

    SLAUGHTERING }] 21 LITTLE Helpless Children at Waco.

    Click Here http://obomlnation.webstarts.c…..dered.html

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.