"Bruce Ratner's latest useful idiots have no one to blame but themselves."
City Journal's Nicole Gelinas reports on the latest lawsuit stemming from the Atlantic Yards boondoggle in Brooklyn, where the state of New York seized private property via eminent domain on behalf of a basketball stadium being built by real estate tycoon Bruce Ratner. As Gelinas notes, the seven Brooklyn residents who filed suit this month aren't actually upset about the eminent domain abuse that occurred, they're just mad at Ratner because he won't let them get in on the spoils:
Ratner gained government backing only by marshaling community support: that is, he shoveled money into new "grassroots" advocacy groups like Brooklyn United for Innovative Local Development (BUILD). Ratner signed a "community benefits agreement" under which BUILD chief James Caldwell would train residents—many of them low-income Brooklynites—for as many as 15,000 well-paying construction jobs at Atlantic Yards….
Now, seven job-seekers are suing, alleging that Ratner and Caldwell duped them into joining a "training" class last year that consisted of reading Wikipedia printouts and then working—unpaid and unsupervised—for two months on a dangerous Staten Island home-construction site owned by a third party. During their "training," the seven "learned very little that they did not already know," they said, because they were "already fully capable of performing construction work."
It's hard to feel much sympathy for anybody who believed Ratner's bogus promises, but at least these seven dupes have a shot at learning from their erroneous ways. As Gelinas puts it:
So the Ratner Seven have learned something: to get a job, you don't depend on the power of the state to seize other people's property. You educate yourself, you learn a trade, and you work hard, sometimes at lower wages than you'd like, to gain experience. That is, the plaintiffs should have kept doing what they were doing before Ratner came along.
Read the full story here. Learn more about the Atlantic Yards case here, and in the video below.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, the seven had a contract with Ratner? The City Journal doesn't seem to indicate the nature of the agreement.
"So the Ratner Seven have learned something: to get a job, you don't depend on the power of the state to seize other people's property. You educate yourself, you learn a trade, and you work hard, sometimes at lower wages than you'd like, to gain experience."
That's crazy talk.
Is it OK if I point at these guys and laugh?
For some reason I sense an OWS analogy struggling to be made here.
I don't understand the criticism of the Ratner Seven; this is a case of fool me once, shame on you....
Con artists/sociopathic duping is not instinctually understood.
seven had a contract with Ratner wow man that's a new one 🙂
Who comes up with all that nonsense??
http://www.anon-surfing.tk
I laughed out loud at bit about those seven schmoes thinking the guy who stole the land using eminent domain could be effing trusted to keep his word.
Does that make me a bad person?