The Affordable Housing Project to Nowhere
The small city of Hercules, California, has scrapped plans on a $100 million affordable housing project that has turned out to be an unaffordable way of providing no housing at all. At the local branch of Patch.com, reporters Bob Poertfield and Jackie Ginley have taken a detailed look at the story of the city's good intentions marred by corruption and conflicts of interest:
State auditors and federal investigators now are trying to unravel what went wrong with the Hercules affordable housing program, Sycamore North and other redevelopment projects in the town.
A key question will be how a financially strapped community committed more than $100 million to an affordable housing program and its related infrastructure, spending nearly $50 million before the money ran out – including $30.2 million on the affordable housing segment of Sycamore North and $17.9 million more on other projects and assistance to benefit low-income residents – without producing a single unit of affordable housing.
Another question will be why Hercules' biggest affordable housing advocate, former City Manager Nelson Oliva, embarked in 2005 upon a spree of borrowing, spending and building that has nearly bankrupted the town.
Oliva, it turns out, was the sole proprietor of NEO Consulting, Inc (which also operated under the name Affordable Housing Solutions Group), which became the city's "de facto housing manager for the better part of the past decade." Oliva became the city manager in 2007, at which point he claimed to have divested ownership and management of NEO to his teenage daughters. His contract with the city required that he not be otherwise employed while city manager. But in 2008, Oliva listed himself as president of NEO in corporate filings. NEO's invoices to the city tripled after Oliva became city manager.
"It's easy for me in hindsight to look at this and say it was a poorly conceived project that was poorly managed," says Frank Fox, a Philadelphia developer whom Hercules hired in February to sort out its real estate transactions. "Cities should not be in the development business."
Read HerculesPatch's ongoing coverage of the crisis plaguing the city here.
Reason on local government here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is an example of bad city planning by Republicans. It is obvious, they need more federal spending and a do-over.
I go chop your dollar. I go take your money disappear.
I love when city managers go to prison.
Awesome, a municipal government creates an "Office of Special Favors" and it all goes awry in a swarm of corruption and misallocation of funds. Another one on my list.
"It's easy for me in hindsight to look at this and say it was a poorly conceived project that was poorly managed."
I suspect nearly anyone could have looked at it from the very beginning and said the same thing.
Wow. $50mm spent on housing, and not one house. That's up there with the hundreds of millions CA has spent on high-speed rail, without a single inch of track to show for it.
What's sickening is when municipals create "Offices of Special Favors" they're perennially shocked and surprised when the operation results in rank corruption.
The answer is always the same, however: Get the right people in charge next time.
It's never, "Hey, maybe having government pick winners and losers is a bad idea regardless of who's in charge."
Not even Hercules can divide $50 million by zero housing units.
But Chuck Norris could.
"Cities should not be in the development business."
Not from around here, are you?
I hope Hercules has some underpants. Although perhaps it doesn't matter with all the steroids he's taking.
More on this story here.
"It's easy for me in hindsight to look at this and say it was a poorly conceived project that was poorly managed,"
It seems to have worked splendidly from Oliva's end.
Since I don't live in Hercules, CA, I feel only the urge to giggle at this story of good intentions gone awry.
You mean "Hunkulues!"
So is this person going to be prosecuted? Maybe if more went to Jail it might change the behavior.
Checkout what happened up here in Hangtown:
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com.....y-charges/