The Future is Back On, Thanks to Africa, Says The Rational Optimist
The West is creaking under the weight of its debt, unfunded pension liabilities, over-promised health care benefits. Yet, despite its best efforts, it won't go to hell in a hand-basket anytime soon, claims Matt Ridley in his latest column in The Times (London). And the reasons have nothing to do with the West's ability to solve its problems. Rather, globalization, technological progress and trade are such overwhelmingly positive forces that they can even overcome the West's stupidity to give it a better future and living standards than it perhaps deserves.
Writes Ridley:
[A] decade of economic stagnation while we pay down (or default on, or inflate away) our debts, if that is what we face, does not mean a decade of technological stagnation. The 1930s saw a rash of innovations that made life better -- from Neoprene to nylon, from Lego to Biro, from sliced bread to television -- and so will the 2010s. Economic growth works by shaving seconds off the time you must work to afford something you want, freeing you to spend that spared time satisfying a new need. The more we work for each other, and the more we amplify our productivity with gadgets and gas, the more wants we can each satisfy…
Much of Africa, having stagnated in the 1980s and 1990s, has begun growing like an Asian tiger, incrementally raising life expectancy and living standards, inexorably cutting birth rates and poverty. Since Africa holds many of the world's poorest people, this is great news for anybody who cares about humanity as a whole. There is a long way to go, but the pessimists who said Africa could never emulate Asia are increasingly being proved wrong…
Cold comfort for Britons, you say? Asian tigers have eaten our lunch: if African lions are joining the feast, what hope have we? A lot, actually. Sure, we could have grown faster too if we had borrowed less and trained engineers rather than overpaid community outreach coordinators. But trade is not a zero-sum game. Other people getting richer means more customers for our goods and services…
Think of technological change this way. Even if you time-travelled back to 1980 with your modern salary, and found yourself far richer than most people, you still could not find wheeled suitcases, mobile phone signals, hepatitis C vaccines or decaff mocha lattes on the high street. Likewise, time-travel forward to a prosperous 2040 without a wage increase and you might find yourself relatively poor. But think of the products you could find there, some of them supplied by newly rich and inventive Africans. Other people getting rich means other people working to invent things for you…
So it is only half the story to say that we need to get back to work if we are to work off the debt and afford the lifestyle we thought we already had. In the long run it is more positive than that. If we get back to work, productively, there is a gigantic opportunity – to sell enough goods and services to the consumers of the world so that we can afford to buy all the wonderful things they could supply us in return and thereby double our real per capita income yet again – as we have done three and half times since 1830…
This is of course the opposite of Peter Thiel's gloomy predictions and panicked calls for greater government spending on research and development that Ron Bailey reports below. Ridley might be a bit too sanguine about the opportunity cost of the West's profligate ways. Things might not turn out to be as bad as we fear right now. But they could have been infinitely better if the West had invested its wealth in building its human and physical capital, instead of squandering it on unsustainable pyramid schemes.
Still, I had to cap the day's thread with a touch of rational optimism. Ridley is on to something that we ought to keep in mind before we start mailordering pirated versions of Zoloft en masse from Africa.
Ridley's column, hidden behind a subscription firewall, here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Rather, globalization, technological progress and trade are such overwhelmingly positive forces that they can even overcome the West's stupidity."
Perhaps; I hope Ridley's right,
We found, via Frannie and Fredd, how much ruin is in a market.
Ridley's a hell of a writer. Highly recommend his books about genetics.
P.S. ya can't get a hep c vaccine these days, unfortunately.
Yeah, there are hep a & b vaccines, but no hep C vaccine.
Africa is not outvie Asia ; they are experiencing an economic colonization-don't kid yourself
"they are experiencing an economic colonization"
I'll presume you have zero evidence for that claim.
I don't know what it means, I'm just here to post.
Read my shitty blog.
"economic colonization" = investment.
If that's 'investment' than robbery is pre-taxation, eminent domain is pre-house sale, rape is pre-consent, and murder is pre-natural death
Even if you time-travelled back to 1980 with your modern salary, and found yourself far richer than most people, you still could not find wheeled suitcases, mobile phone signals, hepatitis C vaccines or decaff mocha lattes on the high street.
It was faster to fly before the suitcases had wheels. Give me a pocket full of dimes and a percolator full of Maxwell House.
GET A HORSE!
"Green Transportation"
If commercial suborbital flight hits the market, I could get from my home to Tokyo in 6 hours. That's 2 hours to drive through 25 miles of traffic to get to the airport, 2 hours to go through the airport security, and 2 hours of flying.
http://www.theaustralian.com.a.....6156133530
So, which is it, reason? Do I get my Jetsons future or don't I?
Who needs flying cars, Obama is going to give us more efficiently regulated salmon!
*whimpers quietly*
I didn't read this article, but unless the future is AIDS, I don't think the premise is correct.
Yep. The future of cancer treatment is AIDS. Well, HIV. Well, genetically modified HIV that doesn't actually give you AIDS, but which can successfully attack immune cells in order to insert genetic material that will grant them the capability to better recognize and attack cancer cells.
What?
This.
you don't need HIV to do that.
It doesn't matter. We're going to try to kill cancer with the cold first:
http://articles.cnn.com/2005-0.....=PM:HEALTH
And then... it's a bee line to "I am Legend".
So, OT, but apparently there's now some hard evidence that Eric Holder perjured himself in his Fast and Furious testimony. Tomorrow should be an interesting day in Warshington. I hope this is finally enough to get a special prosecutor.
Silly, you misunderstood what he was saying.... it was a joke... it was sarcasm
Well, you and I might understand that, but the Republicans might take it a bit more literal-like. And, crucially, might be able to convince enough Democratic Senators that further stalling at this point will just make them look complicit when the inevitable happens and the broader public actually starts to give a shit.
Yeah, but let's see us little people use that defense in court..
Uh... "cutting birth rates" does not correlate with reducing poverty - PRODUCTION correlates with reducing poverty. Just from there I am starting to be skeptical of what Ridley thinks.
There are indeed many inventive Africans - I mean, that Nigerian scam could only have come from a very inventive mind.
The problem, Ridley, is that the moment a few truly inventive Africans start to invest and create businesses, the kleptocrats (government, the State, politicians, the tax-fed leeches we call "police") go into a rampage of looting, pilfering and extortion. That will not change.
Yep. And so long as Africans continue to support guys like these, that whole continent is going to continue to be an economic and cultural shithole.
After watching a few documentaries, I get the feeling that huge swaths of Africans are adamantly opposed to Western influence and want to exclude Europe and N.A. from their markets.
Lower birthrates do in fact correlate with lower poverty. That is not to say that lower birth rates are a cause of lower poverty (it is probably the other way around), but it does seem to be the case.
Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh will become economic powerhouses long before Africa. And I'm here to inform you that they're a loooong way from that.
South America was looking promising less than a decade ago, and look how they decided to fuck it all up.
[A] decade of economic stagnation while we pay down (or default on, or inflate away) our debts, if that is what we face, does not mean a decade of technological stagnation.
No, it doesn't mean people suddenly got dumb. It's just that the dumb ones got to grab the steering wheel.
The problem isn't that we couldn't pay our way out of the hole our dumbass leaders (who unfortunately are never exhausted) have spent us into. The problem is that they've ratcheted up the government spend rate by an as-yet unknown multiple.
What's ObamaCare going to cost by the time it's done? Everything we've got and then some, for a whole lot more than a decade.
Those who say technological progress is going to stagnate (because after all there's nothing "new" on the horizon) are dumb asses.
Those who think we could ever pay off the debts that our current dumb ass leaders have spent us into are also dumb asses.
My ass is now exhausted just from thinking about it.
Anybody who thinks Africa is going to the economic savior of the world over the next decade is an actual, live, on-the-hoof dumb ass. But if thinking about Africa keeps them entertained, I'm okay with that.
one word for Ridley: AIDS.
It's an awful disease. Have you ever seen someone suffering from neuro-AIDS, who can't stand to look out the window because the light from the sun bothers their fragile sensory system?
I really believe that Africa is the future. I mean if you think about it, war and pestilence is great natural selection to select for the smart and cunning. that's a slow process though, and it's not going to happen for another 40-50 years.
That, and China is doing everything it can to rape Africa.
My thoughts exactly. It's going to be one big-ass communist economic zone for China/Russia/Iran.
The "beneficial " effect of AIDS in Africa is not that of natural selection of the smart and cunning, which it doesn't particularly select for anyway. Rather it is merely that it helps a small bit to alleviate overpopulation, one of the two great, chronic impediments to progress in Africa (the other being tribalism). Even that will hardly have the effect of making Africa "the future" - it will only, at best, begin to pull Africa out of a very deep hole.
We also underestimate the ability of people to cling to fundamentally stupid ideas about disease. As long as folk beliefs and conspiracy theories about AIDS rule among the general population, it seems like it will just be a huge burden.
Consider how long it took Western doctors to get over stuff like the practices causing puerperal fever:
Damn, too bad Pasteur wasn't around to back him up.
I find it very hard to take Matt Ridley seriously these days, despite agreeing with virtually everything that he says.
He seems to have been pretty incompetent in his role as Chairman of Northern Rock (he got the job because his Grandfather and father also held that position)
He fully supported massive government support of the industry that he was involved in.
I am not certain why he gets away with it.
One technology that I am aware of in Africa are cellphones, because Africa was notorious for having terrible telecoms companies (normally state run fossils) the land line usage was very low. Cellphones have allowed many Africans to leapfrog over an older technology without having required to have these first. Africa has definite potential, anyone who does not see the big investments are going to lose out.
As for the whole Chinese colonisation argument, give me a break, the Chinese are there for business, I doubt they are stupid enough to try and emulate the behaviour of some European nations of the past.
""""As for the whole Chinese colonisation argument, give me a break, the Chinese are there for business, I doubt they are stupid enough to try and emulate the behaviour of some European nations of the past.""'
The Europeans colonialist were there for business too. Also they did not start out with imposing a colonial government on Africa they started out with making deals with the African leaders, these deals became more and more exclusive with the Europeans and the local leadership getting the spoils.
The actual outright colonial period was fairly short, lasting around a 100 years in many places and often returning back to a system of exclusive deals with the former colonial power with African leadership. The French in particular are still have disproportionate control of some of their former colonies economies.
So the Chinese are still in the first phase, doing exclusive deals with African leaders, and probably will avoid the outright colonial aspect. But may start following up economic control with military forces since the military usually follows the economic especially if Africa becomes a major source of Chinese raw materals
Yes, technology is the answer to many things, but I'm not convinced that Africa 'will save the world'. At least not until there is a change in the way most countries in Africa are run. Just look at Nigeria.
Your essay is good, I like it very much. Here I would like to share with you some things :
Ugg Boots On Sale http://www.uggsukmall.com. -----ercai
The actual outright colonial period was fairly short, lasting around a 100 years in many places and often returning back to a system of exclusive deals with the former colonial power with African leadership. The French in particular are still have disproportionate control of some of their former colonies economies.He seems to have been pretty incompetent in his role as Chairman of Northern Rock (he got the job because his Grandfather and father also held that position)