Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Contagion and Warrior

Battle scenes

Kurt Loder | 9.8.2011 6:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Contagion

In his jittery new movie Contagion, director Steven Soderbergh takes the unusual step, for a big Hollywood production, of killing off Gwyneth Paltrow very near the beginning of the story. Paltrow's character turns out to be the key element in the narrative, however, and so she returns in many flashbacks—not always looking her best, especially with the drawn skin, cracked lips, and foamy discharge we see at the outset—but easily earning her above-the-title credit.

This is a deadly-viral-outbreak movie, a challenging genre in that a virus can't be seen—a fundamental problem in a visual medium—and that the story must inevitably be infused with some amount of medical jargon. The only means of building suspense is to observe the rogue pathogen's effects on the central characters, and to wonder who among them will die.

Soderbergh handles these difficulties with elegant concision. The medical nattering is kept to a minimum; and the characters, as laid out in Scott Z. Burns' tight script, are developed as full and distinctively flawed human beings. We care about these people as they go down, and we're taken by surprise when it's some of the main ones who do.

Paltrow plays Beth Emhoff, a corporate executive who has just concluded a business trip to Hong Kong. As the story gets underway, she is returning home to Minneapolis by way of Chicago (a significant layover, as it turns out). Beth has developed a persistent cough, and assumes she may be coming down with the flu. Back at the house she shares with her husband, Mitch (Matt Damon), and their two kids, her condition quickly deteriorates: She suffers a seizure and is taken to the hospital, where she dies. Here, Damon has one of his most moving scenes. A doctor informs Mitch that his wife is dead, but the stunned husband can't process the information. He wants to see Beth; where is she? With minimal means, Damon demonstrates the visceral resistance of a man suddenly confronted with an event too cruel to be credited.

The disease spreads exponentially—through people coughing into their hands, passing glasses and casino chips, punching in numbers on cash machines, gripping door handles. At one point, we're told that the average person touches his or her face at least 2000 times a day. Sitting in a heavily trafficked movie theater, any viewer might find this information especially discomforting.

As the disease mutates worldwide—through "Day 7," "Day 18," and so forth—a desperate epidemiological investigation gathers speed. At the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Deputy Director Ellis Cheever (Laurence Fishburne) dispatches one of his top researchers, Dr. Erin Mears (Kate Winslet), to Minneapolis to observe the workings of the virus firsthand, while another staffer, Dr. Ally Hextal (Jennifer Ehle), works tirelessly in a super-sterile lab to develop a vaccine. In Geneva, Leonora Orantes (Marion Cotillard), a doctor with the World Health Organization, boards a plane to Hong Kong to attempt to trace the deadly microbe's origin. And in San Francisco, an independent researcher named Sussman (Elliott Gould), striving to find a way to cultivate the virus for examination, is being harassed by an Internet oracle named Alan Krumwiede (Jude Law), who is stirring up his millions of online followers with charges that the government has already discovered a cure for the disease—and is secretly manufacturing a vaccine with which it will first inoculate its own bureaucrats and political insiders. (This is, shall we say, hardly implausible.)

The movie is most powerful in depicting the swift breakdown of civil society. Police and firefighting forces are quickly overwhelmed, looters empty supermarkets of canned goods, funeral homes refuse to accept infected bodies for burial (mass graves have to be dug), and neighbors turn against each other in fear and suspicion. The rampaging paranoia becomes its own kind of disease.

Soderbergh, who as usual shot the movie himself, is vitally assisted by two longtime collaborators: editor Stephen Mirrione, who helped pare away almost all narrative fat (with the possible exception of the scenes featuring Gould, whose character feels vestigial); and composer Cliff Martinez, whose discreetly percussive score keeps even the unavoidable walk-and-talk interludes compelling. In the end the darkness lifts, of course—otherwise, theoretically, who would be left to watch this movie? But a masterfully edited final montage suggests that very worrisome shadows remain.

Warrior

Warrior seems a likely candidate for induction into the pantheon of great boxing movies. It's even more ferocious than many such pictures in that it focuses not on standard sluggery, but on the bloody caged combat of mixed martial arts, with leg swipes, head kicks, and resounding body slams packed in among the savage pinned-down beatings. The story—although you can see its resolution coming from a few miles away—has some unique twists. And the three lead performances—by Nick Nolte, Tom Hardy, and Joel Edgerton—are, in an unavoidable word, terrific.

Nolte plays Paddy Conlon, a veteran MMA trainer who taught everything he knows to his two sons, Tommy (Hardy) and Brendan (Edgerton). But Paddy was a brutal drunkard back in the day, and he drove away his wife, who took Tommy with her, leaving Brendan to be raised, unhappily, by his father. Years later, we find that Paddy has put booze behind him, but is now estranged from Brendan, who refuses to let him see the two children his son has with his wife, Tess (Jennifer Morrison). As for Tommy, he disappeared long ago.

Brendan is a popular high school science teacher. But financial reverses have put him in danger of losing his family's home. Desperate for income, he decides to return to fighting in shabby local matches around the Pittsburgh area. Then he contacts a longtime friend, a gym owner and trainer named Frank (Frank Grillo). Frank feels that Brendan is too old and soft for the fight game, but agrees to start training him for a big MMA tournament soon to be staged in Atlantic City, where the top attraction will be the current world champ, a formidable Russian called Koba (Kurt Angle), who resembles a very tall, heavily muscled refrigerator.

Then Tommy reappears, from who knows where. Dark and angry, he's now a completely mysterious figure. Tommy, too, has returned to fighting, and is also determined to take part in the Atlantic City tournament. Although he despises his father, he nevertheless recruits him to be his trainer—as long as they speak of nothing but the sport, and never socialize. Paddy sorrowfully consents.

I think you can see where this is heading. But while director Gavin O'Connor whips up a high level of ring action—all of it rousingly choreographed and shot close-in for maximum impact—he also maintains an intense focus on the long-buried emotional torment with which Paddy and his two sons are barely able to cope. There's a heartbreaking scene in which Paddy attempts to penetrate Brendan's bitterness from the shadows outside his son's home; and a nighttime confrontation between Brendan and Tommy on an Atlantic City beach that confirms Hardy—the "forger" in Inception—as one of the most gifted young actors in movies right now.    

But Nick Nolte's performance in this film is its central revelation. Now 70 years old, Nolte gathers together every sad detail of a man who has wasted most of his life on drink, and driven away everyone who ever might have loved him and lightened the burdens of an isolated old age. Over the course of a 40-year career, this actor has often been excellent; and in recent years he has been nominated twice for Academy Awards (for Affliction and The Prince of Tides). There may finally be a win in his future, because in playing a weary man worn down by all the wrong turns his life has taken, he has probably never been better.  

Kurt Loder is a writer living in New York. His third book, a collection of film reviews called The Good, the Bad and the Godawful, will be out on November 8th from St. Martin's Press. Follow him on Twitter at kurt_loder.


Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Drug Czar Says 'Young People' Smoke Pot Because They Saw Grandma Do It When She Was Getting Chemotherapy

Kurt Loder is a New York writer who also hosts the SiriusXM interview show True Stories.

CultureMoviesStaff Reviews
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. dbcooper   14 years ago

    Knowing a bit about biotechnology, I find it really difficult not to tune out during thrillers about contagious diseases.

    1. Pain   14 years ago

      Yeah despite all the scientific terminology they seem to be about as plausible as alien invasion movies or zombie movies. The virus is always something "never seen before." What's usually left out is the reason why things like that have "never been seen before" is that they don't generally exist or work that way in nature.

    2. Episiarch   14 years ago

      Feel the same way about movies (and TV) that have hacking in them. Invariably it is moronic. I think the last movie that showed a reasonable facsimile of war dialing and brute force hacking was Wargames.

      Also, lockpicking. Most of the time they don't even use a torque wrench. So stupid. However, lockpicking has been getting better. And over the last 10 years, gun handling has gotten so much better on TV; I mean, amazingly better.

      1. dbcooper   14 years ago

        You must have loved Untraceable then. I know it provided some LOLs for me. 🙂

        http://www.avclub.com/articles.....able,2329/

        1. Episiarch   14 years ago

          Haven't seen it, but I liked that review. The points about stuff like The Net were spot on.

          True abominations in terms of computer hacking are Hackers, any Michael Bay movie involving computers, and of course, the ultimate: Independence Day. They hacked an alien starship's computer! With a Mac!

          1. Kroneborge   14 years ago

            First, The Stand fucking rocked. One of the Kings best books.

            Second, would it really be that hard for some shit like this to happen? We've had deadly flu outbreaks etc before where millions have died.

            1. Sy   14 years ago

              Uh, when?

              1. cw   14 years ago

                The Spanish flu from 1918 to 1919.

  2. Joshua   14 years ago

    So nolte's playing himself then.

    1. dbcooper   14 years ago

      https://twitter.com/Nick_Nolte

  3. Max   14 years ago

    A virus that can't be seen should pose no problem to you libertoids. You always manage to see what you want.

  4. Guillermo Lande   14 years ago

    Man, Kurt, why didn't you warn that you were going to spoil who dies in the movie. You're on my never read again list now.

  5. Occasional Moviegoer   14 years ago

    No.

  6. Occasional Commenter   14 years ago

    Yes.

  7. Yo!   14 years ago

    "some very unique twists"

  8. redefiler   14 years ago

    Saw at a screening this last weekend. Loder was either high or getting a blow job during this movie (unlikely, because close-ups of Paltrow 'emoting' shrivel the testicles). I think the general public wants to see more early Paltrow death scenes, but it takes a special kind of prick to keep bringing her back and ruining it.

    This movie is 80% people talking 'split screen' on cell phones to each other. I wish they had just made this an ad for a cell provider, because obviously they offer superior call service, be nice to know which brand to go with. But for a movie its a total cop out and cheesy way to waste screen time.

    It's another typical Soderbergh movie, a worn out plot, a boring over-exposed & well past their prime 'A' list cast, and a cheap TV quality production. Save your money, in fact, just hold $20 up to the light and ask 'I wonder how many germs are on this' and you've seen the movie.

    1. Episiarch   14 years ago

      As soon as I saw Soderbergh's name on it I thought this would be the case. The guy hasn't made a unique or fresh movie since Sex, Lies, and Videotape. Half his movies are either remakes of other movies, from a book, or a sequel to one of his movies. I half expected this one to be from a book or a remake of a foreign film.

    2. coward   14 years ago

      "Save your money, in fact, just hold $20 up to the light and ask 'I wonder how many germs are on this' and you've seen the movie."

      LOL

  9. Enrique   14 years ago

    Thanks for the spoiler alert!

  10. Tortillapete   14 years ago

    You had me at "killing off Gwyneth Paltrow very near the beginning of the story"

    1. Episiarch   14 years ago

      It was the best part of Se7en, though unfortunately Fincher waited until the end.

      1. Pablo   14 years ago

        "What's in the box?? Tell me what's in the box!!!"

        Her character was pretty superfluous except for that awesome ending.

  11. Warty   14 years ago

    I would never have expected Warrior to be any good. I might have to check it out.

  12. Bob   14 years ago

    Hey Kurt? You're an asshole. Not only do you put up spoilers, you put them in the excerpt on rotten tomatoes.

    You win the award for 2011's "Most Retarded Reviewer". Congrats.

    1. Jim Treacher   14 years ago

      You didn't know it was about MMA?

  13. A Serious Man   14 years ago

    It wasn't a spoiler people, we know Damon's wife dies from the trailer where we see him freak out at the hospital.

  14. chaussures mbt   14 years ago

    love!

  15. Ted S.   14 years ago

    The only means of building suspense is to observe the rogue pathogen's effects on the central characters, and to wonder who among them will die.

    Apparently Kurt Loder never saw Panic in the Streets or The Killer That Stalked New York, both from all the way back in 1950. They both have only one main character getting the contagious disease, and since that character is a criminal in both cases, you know they're going to die. And yet the movies are both excellent, especially The Killer That Stalked New York, which was really just a little B-movie.

  16. Jack von Bauer   14 years ago

    Please tell me that the inane Zinn-Muddist dope Matt Damon dies early. Paltrow the slut is not enough.

  17. Jim Treacher   14 years ago

    Tom Hardy is amazing in Bronson. I didn't think the movie really worked, but it was through no fault of his. Indelible.

  18. Ron   14 years ago
  19. kicksneakerboxes   13 years ago

    good

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Texas Bans Delta-8 THC, Which Is Only Popular Because of Prohibition

Joe Lancaster | 5.23.2025 3:45 PM

The Executive Power Case That Unites Donald Trump and Franklin Roosevelt

Damon Root | 5.23.2025 2:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!