Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Exploring Real Attitudes Toward Entitlement Reform

Emily Ekins | 8.31.2011 6:58 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The latest Reason-Rupe survey results reveal diverse attitudes toward Social Security and Medicare and towards the potential for reform.

Overwhelmingly, Americans view Social Security and Medicare as "contributive" programs, meaning that they believe that all Americans who contributed should be rewarded by receiving their benefits.

This conceptualization of entitlements as "contributive" rather than "redistributive" was explored and discussed in a previous post. Our findings reveal that a majority of Americans are open to entitlement reform as long as they are guaranteed to receive the money they have already contributed into the two programs.

This also helps potentially explain why 67 percent of Americans oppose raising the retirement age. If a majority of Americans view these programs as contributive and essentially a contract with the government, it explains why they would not want the government to change the terms of the contract for when they start getting their money back.

When asked what the Social Security retirement age should be, results ranged from 65 to 75, with a median of 65.

Nevertheless, Americans favor allowing individuals to opt out of the programs if they choose.

In part, this result is likely driven by the 60 percent of individuals who believe that they are primarily responsible for saving enough money to meet basic expenses in retirement. However, only 43 percent believe they are personally responsible for saving enough money to purchase health insurance in retirement.

Most Americans are also not convinced that they will receive back the money they have already contributed to the Social Security system. Retirees, however, are more confident that they will continue to receive expected benefits, in contrast to those who have not yet retired.

Expectations for Social Security Benefits

Click here for full survey results.

Survey Methods

The Reason-Rupe Q3 2011 poll collected a nationally representative sample of 1200 respondents, aged 18 and older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia using live telephone interviews from August 9th-18th 2011. The margin of sampling error for this poll is ± 3 percent. The margin of error for the GOP presidential race numbers is ± 4.79%. Interviews were conducted with respondents using both landline (790) and mobile phones (410). Landline respondents were randomly selected within households based on the adult who had the most recent birthday. Sample was weighted by gender, age, ethnicity, and Census region, based on the most recent US Census data. The sampling frame included landline and mobile phone numbers generated using Random Digit Dialing (RDD) methods and randomly selected numbers from a directory-listed sample. Clickhere for full methodological details. NSON Opinion Strategy conducted the poll's fieldwork. View full methodology.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Writers on Bloggingheads: Matt Welch Talks Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, Jobs, and The Declaration of Independents With Mark Schmitt

Emily Ekins is a research fellow and director of polling at the Cato Institute.

PoliticsPolicyNanny StateSocial SecurityMedicareEntitlementsRetirement
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Zuo   14 years ago

    Cut a check to everybody who paid in, for what they paid in. Then nuke it from orbit.

    FUCK freeloaders who paid in $24 dollars and get payouts in the hundreds of K.

    1. some guy   14 years ago

      Then nuke it from orbit.
      It's the only way to be sure.

      freeloaders who paid in $24 dollars and get payouts in the hundreds of K.
      Does this actually happen? I don't think this actually happens in SS. I guess it could happen in Medicare, but would be very rare.

  2. Rhet Orical   14 years ago

    Does anyone here believe that polls are reality?

    1. some guy   14 years ago

      They are a window on reality. Just information and evidence, but never the whole story.

  3. Lost_In_Translation   14 years ago

    I don't understand why we can't atleast reform the program for those 10 years down the road who don't expect for such an extravagant payout. I don't expect anything, but those 75% of the way there deserve atleast what they pay. Just end the madness.

  4. Au H20   14 years ago

    Oh, give them what they paid in to Medicare! It's probably about 10,000 bucks, and won't pay for much, but that's what you fucks paid in!

  5. sage   14 years ago

    Retirees, however, are more confident that they will continue to receive expected benefits, in contrast to those who have not yet retired.

    I think it's time to let Ol' Painless out the bag. HERE'S YOUR BENEFITS, GEEZBAGGERS!

  6. Episiarch   14 years ago

    Polls are so unbelievably retarded. Why would reason sully its name by doing the same idiotic shit that, say, Newsweek does?

  7. squarooticus   14 years ago

    I want a pony, too.

    The respondents don't understand that the contributive part of the system is aa Ponzi scheme: it only works with new suckers. Someone is going to get nothing back for what they paid in, and I vote for that being the generation that wilfully ignored the problem, I.e., not mine.

  8. hypno hat   14 years ago

    Who was the True Genius who pointed out that the biggest political scam of the twentieth century was convincing the WWII generation that SS and Medicare are not charity. Genius. True Genius.

  9. Almanian   14 years ago

    tl;dr

    But loved the comments. Now, back to something really important: "South Park". The "Canada on Strike" episode. Classic. But aren't they all?

    The End

  10. wareagle   14 years ago

    it takes a lot of capitalism to support the welfare state too many believe they are entitled to.

    1. Trail of Tears   14 years ago

      it takes a lot of genocide to support the capitalist state too many believe they are entitled to.

  11. Geezer   14 years ago

    guaranteed to receive the money they have already contributed

    Including compounded 8% annual interest and accounting for real inflation, of course.

  12. Amakudari   14 years ago

    Yo, pro-tip: each chart should contain all the information necessary to interpret it. Include a title and source information. Please. I just polled everyone and asked if you need to do this. Here are the results.

    1. Amakudari   14 years ago

      Minority attitude though it may be.

    2. some guy   14 years ago

      I know! What is this? Some BS online rag?

      1. Amakudari   14 years ago

        Most bloggers usually have this stuff figured out.

        I can only tell what these are for based on their filenames:

        http://reason.com/assets/mc/ee.....optout.jpg

        http://reason.com/assets/mc/ee.....optout.jpg

  13. Alan   14 years ago

    Back in the 1980's Chile's retirement system was becoming a large part of the federal budget, so they gave people the option to receive a rebate for their contributions and invest their money themselves. 95% of the country chose to opt out, and now their federal budget isn't clogged up with an overwhelming retirement program, and the citizens have done very well on their own.

    1. Lost_In_Translation   14 years ago

      So chile is a good place to emigrate to.

      Good to know...

  14. Biggest government entitlement   14 years ago

    The primary redistributive big-government entitlement program is privation property land title.

  15. Watoosh   14 years ago

    The problem I see with a simple "opt out" solution with something like Social Security is that the only real place people can invest in is the stock market, since the currency has been inflated for a century and a simple savings account would leave you with fuck all for retirement. And how the fuck would normal people have the time and skills to keep up with the stock market for decades? Maybe if the economy wasn't built on sand you could consider opting out, but it is what it is.

    1. adam   14 years ago

      There are other options. You can purchase retirement annuities from insurance companies, for example, that give you a guaranteed amount of income. Insurance companies will sell these to you in exchange for a monthly payment during your working years. If SS wasn't around, I'd expect that this kind of product would be quite popular.

      1. some guy   14 years ago

        I keep seeing these ads for reverse mortgages too. Pretty interesting idea for home owners.

    2. some guy   14 years ago

      Wattoosh, you can also invest in bonds and commodities. A properly balanced portfolio will protect you from both inflation and recession. There's a bunch of "balanced" funds out there that you can invest in so you don't have to keep up with much of anything. Little time and little skill needed.

    3. Amakudari   14 years ago

      the only real place people can invest in is the stock market

      Or bonds, commodities, CDs, annuities, etc.

      And most people don't need to keep up with stocks, even if that is their main investment: just buy index funds. If they have a broad-based global basket of investments, they'll do pretty well over a sufficiently long time horizon.

  16. adam   14 years ago

    That annual statement that SS sends tells you how much you've paid in SS taxes and Medicare taxes over your life. Maybe that thing needs to be updated to explain the difference between those taxes and the actual cost of the benefits being paid.

  17. Alan   14 years ago

    I'm all in favor of letting everyone who contributed get some of their money back, but when will people realize that they'll be lucky if they get back 80 cents on the dollar - and the longer we delay fixing this, the less we'll be getting back?

  18. some guy   14 years ago

    When asked what the Social Security retirement age should be, results ranged from 65 to 75, with a median of 65.

    Here's an idea: Stop stealing my money and I'll decide when my retirement age should be. The rest of you can die in the streets, or not, as you see fit.

  19. Dr. K   14 years ago

    Our findings reveal that a majority of Americans are open to entitlement reform as long as they are guaranteed to receive the money they have already contributed into the two programs.

    Which is another way of saying that they don't support entitlement reform at all. Look folks, like all ponzi schemes, the money is GONE. Insisting they can shut down the program right after they "pay you back" is the same thing as insisting it continue forever. You need to accept that you'll never get paid back, and that the most prudent course is to shut down the monster before it destroys any more.

  20. Air Jordans 2011 Shoes   14 years ago

    Here you can choose more new products, enjoy more discounts, so you get favorite products while saving money.

  21. Nike Dunk High   14 years ago

    Greetings Now i'm for that reason happy I stubled onto any site,Nike Dunk High Prefer came across you will just by error, at the same time Document was first Nike Dunk 2008 Gold Black browsing relating to Bing just for something.

  22. Nike Dunk High   14 years ago

    thanks

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Slow Down, Say Cheese

Charles Oliver | 8.5.2025 4:00 AM

The Government Fined This Farm Over $550,000—Mostly for a Paperwork Violation

Billy Binion | 8.4.2025 6:03 PM

Upholding a Vaccine Mandate, the 9th Circuit Embraces an Alarmingly Broad Definition of 'Public Health'

Jacob Sullum | 8.4.2025 5:25 PM

St. Louis Fan Removal for MAGA Hat Ignites Debate Over Free Speech

Tosin Akintola | 8.4.2025 3:22 PM

How 'National Security' Came Unmoored From Americans' Actual Security

Brandan P. Buck | 8.4.2025 2:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!