Reason.tv: Obamacare, Government Insurance Exchanges, & The Coming Price Explosion
One of the features of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the health-care reform bill colloquially known as Obamacare, is the creation of insurance exchanges that will offer heavily subsidized policies and coverage for people who cannot get insurance through their employers.
In projecting the program's costs, the Congressional Budget Office figures that about 7 percent of the workforce currently covered by employer-provided insurance will drop those policies and sign up for the subsidized insurance. That estimate - and hence, the cost structure of the program - has been challenged by sources such as McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, which reckons a far higher percentage of workers will opt out of their current job-based plans. In a survey of employers released in June, McKinsey found that 30 percent will "definitely or probably" drop their coverage as Obamacare kicks into high gear in 2014. Among "employers with a high awareness of reform, this proportion rises to more than 50 percent," says the report. Why? It will be cheaper to pay fines than to provide coverage.
If those estimates are accurate, the cost savings ObamaCare supporters tout are a pipe dream.
Glenn Morton, the author of the new book Passing Obamacare, has worked for nearly two decades in the health-insurance business, most recently as a broker who helps employers find better deals among providers. In a discussion with Reason's Nick Gillespie, Morton adds another problem with recently released Obamacare rules: The mandate to reduce the percentage of insurance costs that go to administrative costs effectively means that insurance brokers' commissions will be either drastically cut or reduced altogether. If brokers' role in hunting for better coverage plans is eviscerated, argues Morton, companies will lose their main ally in the search for affordable and dependable coverage plans. The result, says Morton, will be that more and more companies will cease to offer insurance, thus driving even more people into the insurance exchanges and the cost of Obamacare up and up. CBO says the cost of giving subsidies to 16 million individuals over Obamacare's first decade will be $466 billion alone.
About 4.30 minutes. Shot by Meredith Bragg, Jim Epstein, and Josh Swain. Edited by Anthony L. Fisher.
Go to Reason.tv for downloadable versions of this video. And subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube Channel for automatic notifications when new material goes live.
To read Reason's coverage of health care online, go here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Are there really so few moral people left in this country that laws like these don't inspire 1960s-civil-rights-movement-scale protests, at least? Where the hell is everybody?
Where the hell is everybody?
TRACKTOR.PULLZ
I'm at work. Where are you?
In other words, all is going according to plan: single-payer here we come!
This X100000000000000000000000000000
Nope. They are too late. We don't have the money for single payer. The whole things is just going to collapse.
And this has been a problem for our Top Men since...when?
Since about two weeks ago.
The court ruling striking down the mandate or the debt ceiling? Because I don't see either one of those being an obstacle for these clowns.
The legislative debt ceiling debate was a farce: the *real* debt ceiling comes when the US can no longer borrow money. That day is quickly coming, as the Fed's recent need to purchase 70% of Treasury issues shows.
Of course, by "when the US can no longer borrow money" I mean "when no one will lend the US government money anymore".
Whaddya mean we don't have any more money? Doesn't the Administration own the printing press?
Why do you think the price of gold is soaring through the stratosphere?
Nope. They are too late. We don't have the money for single payer. The whole things is just going to collapse.
I agree but we're dealing with people who are economically illiterate. So I can easily envision them trying it, however insane it is to do so.
exactly
Virtually every developed country in the world except the US has a single payer system, and they are spending much less on healthcare than we do. It seems to me that we don't have the money for a multi-payer system, not the other way around.
I'm sure you can keep costs down like us Canadians do by not offering procedures like this.
There are many ways to do things on the cheap. Not offering a procedure to a person who needs it is one of them.
[Stuff like this is what you Americans will have to look forward to if you take after us Canucks.]
Wouldn't you be mad at your employer if they insisted on providing health insurance instead of paying the fine and dropping coverage if it meant you would end up with more money and health insurance (through the govt provided exchanges) at the end of the day?
If my employer says we can give you a 10% raise or health insurance, and I know that I can go to these exchanges and get coverage that might be cheaper than what I pay for work, wouldn't this be smart for the company to do?
I mean, it would clearly further bankrupt our country and create a new entitlement system that would be irreversible, but I need to get cash NOW so I can build my compound for when the mass riots start.
I've made a few design changes to the high-security Dean compound. After the London riots, I decided to add a row of spikes next to the gate. To put the severed heads of my enemies on.
Fortunately, the gate is downwind from the house.
I find dipping the heads in tar keeps the smell down.
I knew the riots were a deliberate attempt to line the pockets of Big Concertina Wire.
Little girl kidnapped from playground, "civilian" chases down van and saves her.
Cops eventually catch up, make arrest.
http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/c.....saves-girl
Nothing else fucking happened.
Wow, the cops actually praised him.
Good on them.
"There's no conspiracy to impose single-payer - it's right there!"
I never thought about it like that before. Makes sesne dude. Wow.
http://www.real-privacy.au.tc
Breaking the link between employment and insurance is good.
This is probably not the best way to do it.
Models of single-payer healthcare systems exist. Why can't America have the same system?
"Why can't America have the same system?"
Because they're crappy and don't work.
thank u
Nick looks like he want's to cut a bitch in the still frame.
I believe you are only elligible for the exchange if the cost of a private policy in your state exceeds 10% of your annual gross.
Hello Everyone,
I am the author in the video. Thank you for reading and commenting. I have posted 3 articles that explain in further detail how Obamacare will harm our country. You can find them on passingobamacare (dot) com. As I get time, I will respond to any questions you may have in this thread...
I mean, it would clearly further bankrupt our country and create a new entitlement system that would be irreversible, but I need to get cash NOW so I can build my compound for when the mass riots start.
Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly FG Mens Football Boots-Yellow/Black
Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly FG Mens Football Boots-Red/Blue/Silvery
very nice
thanks