Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Transparency Advocate and Former Obama Adviser on "Our Untransparent President"

Matt Welch | 6.27.2011 8:35 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

University of Chicago law professor and American Constutition Society Chairman Geoffrey R. Stone gives his former colleague a brisk what-for in the pages of The New York Times:

As a longtime supporter and colleague of Barack Obama at the University of Chicago, as well as an informal adviser to his 2008 campaign, I had high hopes that he would restore the balance between government secrecy and government transparency that had been lost under George W. Bush, and that he would follow through on his promise, as a candidate, to promote openness and public accountability in government policy making.

It has not quite worked out that way.

How so?

In early 2009 members of Congress enthusiastically introduced the Whistle-Blower Protection Enhancement Act, which promised substantial protection to certain classes of government employees who report matters of legitimate public concern to lawmakers or the media. Although as a candidate Mr. Obama had expressed support for such a law, his administration cooled to the idea and let it die in the Senate in late 2010 (it was reintroduced in April 2011). Sadly, as a number of high-profile criminal cases against whistle-blowers show, the Obama administration has followed its predecessor in aggressively cracking down on unauthorized leaks.

President Obama has also followed Mr. Bush in zealously applying the state secrets doctrine, a common-law principle intended to enable the government to protect national security information from disclosure in litigation. Although legitimate in theory, the doctrine had been invoked in an unprecedented manner by the Bush administration to block judicial review of a broad range of questionable practices. […]

[T]he Obama administration has aggressively asserted the privilege in litigation involving such issues as the C.I.A.'s use of extraordinary rendition and the National Security Agency's practice of wiretapping American citizens.

Stone's conclusion has practical application far beyond transparency policies or Democratic politics:

The record of the Obama administration on this fundamental issue of American democracy has surely fallen short of expectations. This is a lesson in "trust us." Those in power are always certain that they themselves will act reasonably, and they resist limits on their own discretion. The problem is, "trust us" is no way to run a self-governing society.

Link via the Twitter feed of Glenn Greenwald. Reason on government transparency here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Morning Links: Adult Diapers, Fighting Judges, and Lulz

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsBarack ObamaTransparency
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mister DNA   14 years ago

    But… but… can you imagine how much worse it would be if McCain had won?!?

  2. Scruffy Nerfherder   14 years ago

    McCain would probably have us storming the 38th parallel by now. Only minorly worse than glassing over Libya, I guess.

    1. Mister DNA   14 years ago

      I’d say a McCain presidency would be worse in the same sense that eating a shit sandwich made on bread I don’t like is worse than eating a shit sandwich made on bread I do like.

    2. John   14 years ago

      Whatever gets you through the night. A McCain Presidency would have looked just like the Obama one, minus the stimulus and Obamacare. Everything else would have been about the same

      1. Sinic   14 years ago

        minus the stimulus

        Didn’t he vote for every stimulus package in the Senate?

        And I would hope that would not have taken the “look forward, not back” attitude towards those that authorized and committed torture.

        1. John   14 years ago

          No he voted against the Obama stimulus. And he was always good on spending despite his other faults.

          http://www.senate.gov/legislat…..vote=00063

          1. DJF   14 years ago

            No, he is good on some spending, however he supported TARP and the other crazy financial deals done by the FED and Treasury and he does not seem to be able to find a place on Earth where he would not send US troops or bombers and that costs a lot of money.

            1. John   14 years ago

              Again, I said a McCain administration would have been just like an Obama administration minus Stimulus and Obamacare. That would include TARP and Libya and the Afghan surge.

            2. John   14 years ago

              And no way would McCain get away with not going to Congress on Libya.

              1. JW   14 years ago

                It’s only a constitutional crisis when an uncharismatic white guy does it.

                1. Pro Libertate   14 years ago

                  No charisma? Didn’t you see his work on Battlestar Galactica?

      2. John Thacker   14 years ago

        You forgot gays in the military.

        OTOH, you also forgot a higher change of getting ethanol subsidies slashed.

  3. sarcasmic   14 years ago

    Meet the new boss…

  4. Sinic   14 years ago

    And there’s the secret interpretation of the Patriot Act. It’s pretty damn scary considering their public interpretation of the War Powers Act.

    1. Dean Wormer   14 years ago

      Wait until you find out about the Double Secret interpretation of the Patriot Act!

  5. Barack Obama   14 years ago

    Geoffrey, the campaign is over.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   14 years ago

    This is a lesson in “trust us.”

    Stone’s an idiot, and so is anyone who didn’t see this coming. There was nothing about Candidate Obama that didn’t scream, “There’s a government solution to your problem.” Government can’t solve your problems if your scrutiny is allowed to gum up the works. Statists must operate as much in the shadows as they can.

  7. heller   14 years ago

    The problem is, “trust us” is no way to run a self-governing society.

    Hehe, what is this “self-governing society” you speak of?

    1. Almanian   14 years ago

      It’s hidden in the same place as the “free market capitalism” that my lefty friends keep telling me is the source of all economic woe.

      And I always ask them the same question: “Where is this ‘free economy’ of which you speak…??”

  8. WTF   14 years ago

    “This is a lesson in “trust us.” Those in power are always certain that they themselves will act reasonably, and they resist limits on their own discretion. The problem is, “trust us” is no way to run a self-governing society.”

    The scales fall from his eyes. But what do you want to bet he’s still on Team Obama for 2012?

  9. Almanian   14 years ago

    Also, the bubble wrap over the pic is a nice touch, but

    1) RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!! and

    2) VIOLENT ELIMUNASHUNIST RHETORIC THREATENING TEH PREZIDENT ZONGWTF KOCHTOPUS!!!!1!1o1ojo!!!

  10. JW   14 years ago

    The record of the Obama administration on this fundamental issue of American democracy has surely fallen short of expectations.

    Disillusioned partisan bootlickers just can’t quite bring themselves to say it out loud.

    1. Mainer   14 years ago

      They really are like the abused wife, unable to face reality.

  11. Kochtopussy   14 years ago

    All Obama voters should be forced to parade around in public, naked except for a sandwich board reading, “I was a fool.”

    1. Hazel Meade   14 years ago

      +100 for Excellent handle!

  12. Tulpa   14 years ago

    Those in power are always certain that they themselves will act reasonably, and they resist limits on their own discretion.

    Or perhaps they resist those limits because they plan to act unreasonably.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!