Transparency Advocate and Former Obama Adviser on "Our Untransparent President"
University of Chicago law professor and American Constutition Society Chairman Geoffrey R. Stone gives his former colleague a brisk what-for in the pages of The New York Times:
As a longtime supporter and colleague of Barack Obama at the University of Chicago, as well as an informal adviser to his 2008 campaign, I had high hopes that he would restore the balance between government secrecy and government transparency that had been lost under George W. Bush, and that he would follow through on his promise, as a candidate, to promote openness and public accountability in government policy making.
It has not quite worked out that way.
How so?
In early 2009 members of Congress enthusiastically introduced the Whistle-Blower Protection Enhancement Act, which promised substantial protection to certain classes of government employees who report matters of legitimate public concern to lawmakers or the media. Although as a candidate Mr. Obama had expressed support for such a law, his administration cooled to the idea and let it die in the Senate in late 2010 (it was reintroduced in April 2011). Sadly, as a number of high-profile criminal cases against whistle-blowers show, the Obama administration has followed its predecessor in aggressively cracking down on unauthorized leaks.
President Obama has also followed Mr. Bush in zealously applying the state secrets doctrine, a common-law principle intended to enable the government to protect national security information from disclosure in litigation. Although legitimate in theory, the doctrine had been invoked in an unprecedented manner by the Bush administration to block judicial review of a broad range of questionable practices. […]
[T]he Obama administration has aggressively asserted the privilege in litigation involving such issues as the C.I.A.'s use of extraordinary rendition and the National Security Agency's practice of wiretapping American citizens.
Stone's conclusion has practical application far beyond transparency policies or Democratic politics:
The record of the Obama administration on this fundamental issue of American democracy has surely fallen short of expectations. This is a lesson in "trust us." Those in power are always certain that they themselves will act reasonably, and they resist limits on their own discretion. The problem is, "trust us" is no way to run a self-governing society.
Link via the Twitter feed of Glenn Greenwald. Reason on government transparency here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But... but... can you imagine how much worse it would be if McCain had won?!?
McCain would probably have us storming the 38th parallel by now. Only minorly worse than glassing over Libya, I guess.
I'd say a McCain presidency would be worse in the same sense that eating a shit sandwich made on bread I don't like is worse than eating a shit sandwich made on bread I do like.
Whatever gets you through the night. A McCain Presidency would have looked just like the Obama one, minus the stimulus and Obamacare. Everything else would have been about the same
minus the stimulus
Didn't he vote for every stimulus package in the Senate?
And I would hope that would not have taken the "look forward, not back" attitude towards those that authorized and committed torture.
No he voted against the Obama stimulus. And he was always good on spending despite his other faults.
http://www.senate.gov/legislat.....vote=00063
No, he is good on some spending, however he supported TARP and the other crazy financial deals done by the FED and Treasury and he does not seem to be able to find a place on Earth where he would not send US troops or bombers and that costs a lot of money.
Again, I said a McCain administration would have been just like an Obama administration minus Stimulus and Obamacare. That would include TARP and Libya and the Afghan surge.
And no way would McCain get away with not going to Congress on Libya.
It's only a constitutional crisis when an uncharismatic white guy does it.
No charisma? Didn't you see his work on Battlestar Galactica?
You forgot gays in the military.
OTOH, you also forgot a higher change of getting ethanol subsidies slashed.
Meet the new boss...
And there's the secret interpretation of the Patriot Act. It's pretty damn scary considering their public interpretation of the War Powers Act.
Wait until you find out about the Double Secret interpretation of the Patriot Act!
Geoffrey, the campaign is over.
This is a lesson in "trust us."
Stone's an idiot, and so is anyone who didn't see this coming. There was nothing about Candidate Obama that didn't scream, "There's a government solution to your problem." Government can't solve your problems if your scrutiny is allowed to gum up the works. Statists must operate as much in the shadows as they can.
Hehe, what is this "self-governing society" you speak of?
It's hidden in the same place as the "free market capitalism" that my lefty friends keep telling me is the source of all economic woe.
And I always ask them the same question: "Where is this 'free economy' of which you speak...??"
The scales fall from his eyes. But what do you want to bet he's still on Team Obama for 2012?
Also, the bubble wrap over the pic is a nice touch, but
1) RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!! and
2) VIOLENT ELIMUNASHUNIST RHETORIC THREATENING TEH PREZIDENT ZONGWTF KOCHTOPUS!!!!1!1o1ojo!!!
The record of the Obama administration on this fundamental issue of American democracy has surely fallen short of expectations.
Disillusioned partisan bootlickers just can't quite bring themselves to say it out loud.
They really are like the abused wife, unable to face reality.
All Obama voters should be forced to parade around in public, naked except for a sandwich board reading, "I was a fool."
+100 for Excellent handle!
Those in power are always certain that they themselves will act reasonably, and they resist limits on their own discretion.
Or perhaps they resist those limits because they plan to act unreasonably.