Foreign Policy

Is Russia Today Just Propaganda for Uposcrabblenyk?

|

Accuracy in Media puts together a wonderful highlight reel of Pravda-style denunciations of the U.S.A., culled from the English-language feed of the state-funded RT news network: 

You may spot a familiar face or two from Reason and the larger liberpunk universe. We're not the ones making anti-American statements, however. We're red-blooded Americans who just pretend to be parasitical coastal cosmopolitan pantywaists because that's where the media money is. 

Call it Cold War nostalgia, but I still think there are few things funnier than making fun of Russians in exactly this way. I have just two beefs with AIM. First, that we are all standing on the bear-sized shoulders of SCTV's "CCCP1" simulcast from the early eighties, which introduced North America to such Soviet favorites as Uposcrabblenyk and What Fits Into Russia, a newsmagazine demonstrating the vastness of a Soviet Empire that could swallow up whole countries and even continents. ("Too bad for capitalist convicts and kangaroos who inhabit this godforsaken place Australia… Giant continent? Ha ha ha! Giant joke!") And of course, the unforgettable Hey Giorgy!

I'm also not sure about AIM's criticism of RT as lacking not only "journalistic integrity" but also the "lavish funding of its competitors." I'd prefer that governments not fund media of any kind, but RT has made a perfectly respectable entry into the American news market. 

Vasily Tyorkin, great Soviet hero of Soviet greatness

And it's done much better than our own government-funded efforts in the Arabic news market. In the last ten years you have paid for the Al-Hurra TV network, the Sawa radio network and the teen magazine Hi, among other State Department media ventures in the Arab nations. The TV network has failed to gain viewers and its costs have been going up. The State Department's inspector general says the radio station has failed to fulfill its mandate. At least the teen magazine was allowed to go out of business. (Anecdotally, I've never heard Sawa on local radio or seen Al-Hurra on TV, and the only evidence of Hi I ever saw was a billboard advertising it in Beirut.) 

RT, by contrast, gets wide distribution in the Arab world, and produces the same kind of close-enough news selection it does in English, with the same electric-green branding. The channel caters to Russian interests, but not rigidly so. Its Syria coverage, for example, has turned anti-regime at about the same rate as other Arabic media. This puts RT about on par with that Great Game propaganda organ Vogue, which only recently got around to disappearing its February puff piece on first lady Asma Assad from its site. 

But if you want to mock RT as a Kremlin foghorn, you would do better to skip its coverage of Libya or the deficit or the permanent warfare state. These are topics on which RT's bias is pretty much the same as that of the majority of Americans. RT's special Putinovian concerns really come through when it is covering news related to Russia. When RT reports on the arrest of the true killer of Anna Politkovskaya or the imminent downfall of the tie-chewing dictator Saakashvili, it truly sounds as clumsy and strident as the original TASS. But so what? Why would anybody expect a hard-hitting expos√© on Russian interests from a Russian news network? Nor is all of RT's Russia coverage propaganda. I don't think anybody could watch the network's human interest report on the Moscow woman who became both mother and grandmother of twins when she was implanted with ova fertilized by her dead son, and not come away changed for the worse. 

Taking what you want from opposition literature is an American tradition older than the republic, dating back at least to Benjamin Franklin's conversion to deism as a result of reading anti-deist pamphlets. "It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them, for the arguments of the deists which were quoted to be refuted appeared to me much stronger than the refutations," Franklin wrote in his autobiography. "In short, I soon became a thorough deist." 

NEXT: Reason Morning Links: Debt, War, and the Apocalypse

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Fuck AIM. Alyona rules.

    1. So that whole “Koch Brothers + Tea Party + Racism” thing? That “rules” to you?

  2. We’re red-blooded Americans who just pretend to be parasitical coastal cosmopolitan pantywaists because that’s where the media money is.

    I can respect that.

  3. I wouldn’t follow RT for honest reporting about Khorodovsky.

    However, given the paucity of any dissenting voices in the MSM regarding pretty much any issues related to civil liberties (with the exception of glbt concerns), perhaps AIM could look into that. They might want to do so before their studios get taken by eminent domain, or “civilly” forfeited because someone claimed they saw a guy smoking a joint near them, though.

  4. Wow, SCTV lifting jokes from Calvin Coolidge.

  5. We need some “Count Floyd Presents ‘3D House of Russian Entertainment.'”

    Also, “taking what you want from opposition literature…? In Soviet Russia, state take what it want from YOU!

  6. One of the MI PBS stations showed some SCTV a couple months ago during one of the begathonos – even some stuff I’d never seen (I didn’t think I’d missed anything over the years).

    I almost pissed myself laughing. THAT was some funny shit, SCTV.

  7. Some people think the only thing we should ever do is preach orthodoxy to the choir.

    Even this network is a party organ for the Russian state, that’s all the more reason for red-blooded Americans to go on it and tell all those poor misguided propaganda victims the libertarian truth.

  8. What might save us, me and you
    Is that the Russians love their children too

    [vomits]

    1. But it becomes funny if you merely change “children” to “childrens” and sing or say the whole thing with even just a slight fake accent.

  9. I’m not especially concerned about Russia’s funding of media outlets critical of the West. I am concerned about Russia’s success in squelching media outlets critical of Putin.

    1. Not as long as there’s http://vladimirputinactioncomics.com/

      But it is disturbing that there haven’t been any new entries put up for weeks now.

  10. Those girls are such commies, even their underwear is red! I dare them to prove me otherwise!

  11. Adam Kokesh does put on an entertaining show.

  12. It’s great to see Deism being mentioned! Far too few people even know that Deism exists. This is strange, especially in America where many of the key Founders were Deists.

    Progress! Bob Johnson
    http://www.deism.com

  13. Besides the hipsterism, appearing on propaganda outlets is the other reason, er, Reason isn’t taken as seriously as it should.

    1. I mean really, like a reverse Yakov Smirnoff. But at least he had the convictions to actually defect…

  14. Ah, I loved SCTV as a kid! They’ve released some of the episodes on DVD, but most of them apparently are tied up in perpetuity over music rights issues.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.