Nick Gillespie on RT Tonight, Talking About Pols & Media Circus

Reason Staff | 6.2.2011 5:26 PM

Nick Gillespie will be on RT's The Alyona Show tonight, talking about the crazy stories coming out of DC like something out of congressman's YFrog account. Go here for more info or to watch online.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

NEXT: Dutch Government Plans to Make Cannabis Cafés Member-Only Clubs; Foreigners Need Not Apply

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

RandyAyn 14 years ago

What a bunch of fucking hypocrites you people are! Truly amazing that Reason would Deep 6 a story this important to its readership:

Did I miss where Reason was all over this story or do the Hit & Run editors not find it newsworthy that Rand Paul doesn't believe in the First Amendment?

http://www.salon.com/news/opin.....index.html

"But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that's really an offense that we should be going after -- they should be deported or put in prison." - Rand Paul
1. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
  
  Rand Paul isn't 100% on the good side, but when he is, he pretty FUCKING RIGHT!
  1. RandyAyn 14 years ago
    
    How would you know if you got your information from Reason?
    1. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
      
      I got my information from CSPAN. That speech he gave about protecting our civil liberties from the PATRIOT Act was fucking awesome.
      1. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
        
        But I agree with you; Reason should say something about that quote from Rand. It's sounds interesting.
        
        RandyAyn 14 years ago
        
        Can we get somebody, anybody from the staff to say something, anything about this? Tim? Jacob? Matt? Anybody? Hello?!?!?
        
        Episiarch 14 years ago
        
        Dude, CALM THE FUCK DOWN. You're more annoying than rectal. Think about that for a second.
        
        Warty 14 years ago
        
        I assumed it was rectal. You don't think so?
        
        Episiarch 14 years ago
        
        I was thinking it seemed concern troll in the Hobie Hanson/DanT style, actually.
        
        rectal can't form coherent sentences, after all, being a mongoloid.
        
        RandyAyn 14 years ago
        
        You call me rectal, but you're the one with your head up your ass.
        
        Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
        
        PWND!
        
        rather 14 years ago
        
        Speaking of thinking about me:
        warty old man, when you jerk-off thinking about me, have 911 on your speed dial.
      2. RandyAyn 14 years ago
        
        What do you think about Reason failing to cover his remarks about putting people in prison for attending political speeches?
        
        Otto 14 years ago
        
        I think they haven't gotten around to it yet. IIRC, it's not like it's a newsroom where assignments are handed out. They pick and choose what they want to write about, and they don't always jump on things immediately.
        
        Otto 14 years ago
        
        I think they haven't gotten to it yet. I also think you need some Valium.
        
        - 14 years ago
        
        How/Why is reason.com obligated to cover every story to please every person? How/Why is the absence of any particular story at reason.com an indictment of reason.com?
        
        RandyAyn 14 years ago
        
        The absence of any mention of this very important story, about well-known and influential libertarian Rand Paul disavowing the First Amendment, is itself an indictment of reason.com. Combine that with all the heavy advertising Paul's been doing around here and you have to wonder if they're not laying off him for reasons other than they just "missed" the story. That's why I asked the question.
        
        SugarFree 14 years ago
        
        It's not half as annoying as your goddamn whining and spamming the last five threads with it. You remnd us fucking constantly about your own shitty blog, rather, go fucking post it there.
        
        RandyAyn 14 years ago
        
        The pointing out of the hypocrisy is more annoying than the hypocrisy itself, I agree, but the hypocrisy is more consequential. Therefore it's important to point it out.
        I'm not sure what your cognitive impairment is, Sugar Free, but the link I posted was from Glenn Greenwald, not a blog that I maintain.
        
        SugarFree 14 years ago
        
        Fuckwit. "post it on your blog" rather, I know it wasn't from your shitty blog. Reading is sooooo hard.
        
        rather 14 years ago
        
        are you slow? I told you it wasn't me, he/she told you he doesn't know what you are ranting about. Eat a fucking chocolate bar
Kentucky Fried Pussy 14 years ago

Awesome, more Ayona!
1. rather 14 years ago
  
  I knew you fried everything you eat there but pussy?
  1. Buffalo Bill 14 years ago
    
    I like to eat the skins first.
    1. rather 14 years ago
      
      Hmm, crispy prepuce!
FlyoverCountry 14 years ago

I can't watch these Russia Today clips at work (which is where I have a decently fast internet connection), so I have to ask, what is Russia Today? Is it like CNN for russians in America? Why do they always feature Reason writers?

Any help is appreciated.
1. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
  
  It's a spinoff of that nude news channel from Russia, but due to our puritanical ways, Alyona's tits and pie are clothed.
rather 14 years ago

Nick Gillespie will be on RT's The Alyona Show tonight, talking about the crazy stories coming out of DC like something out of congressman's YFrog account

I'm only watching if Nick is showing his junk, with, or without the leather jacket
1. Episiarch 14 years ago
  
  Why would you think anyone would give a shit whether you watched or not? Maybe you can post about it on your blog and have no one read it.
  1. rather 14 years ago
    
    baby, is so cranky.
    1. Big Fan 14 years ago
      
      Have you two set a date yet? Will there be an open bar? Can I bring my mother?
      1. rather 14 years ago
        
        here
        Bring your own drugs*/sheep/mothers/weapons
        No clothes allowed
        We have our own still,microbrewery and weed greenhouse*
      2. rather 14 years ago
        
        Bring your own drugs*/sheep/mothers/weapons
        
        No clothes allowed
        
        We have our own weed greenhouse, still and microbrewery
        
        here
      3. rather 14 years ago
        
        Bring your own drugs*/sheep/mothers/weapons
        
        No clothes allowed
        
        We have our own weed* greenhouse, still and microbrewery
        
        rather 14 years ago
        
        here
        
        here 14 years ago
        
        http://mychinaviews.com/2011/0.....table-stru?tures/
        
        rather 14 years ago
        
        http://mychinaviews.com/wp-con.....04/016.jpg
        here
Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago

If you were watching CNN in the last few minutes, the New Jersey Texan, Paul Begala, put his foot in his mouth once again by saying that "Unless you are in a relationship with a guy, you can't be more 'pro-gay rights' than Ted Kennedy."

Paul Begala, the homophobe?
1. Otto 14 years ago
  
  "Unless you are in a relationship with a guy, you can't be more 'pro-gay rights' than Ted Kennedy."
  
  Michelle Bachmann is in a relationship with a guy.
  1. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
    
    As someone who fancies himself a closeted butt-sex enthusiast, I was quite offended by Begala's remark.
2. - 14 years ago
  
  You provided no context, and assuming for a moment that a dead person (Kennedy) can be pro-gay rights, I take Begala's utterly insignificant remark to mean that an actual gay person probably has more understanding of the issues involved than a straight person. If that's true, then it follows that only women can be gynecologists, and only men can give proctological exams.
  1. - 14 years ago
    
    Make that prostate exams. Right cavity, wrong organ.
  2. Achtung Coma Baby 14 years ago
    
    I have just one or two questions:
    
    First, why is Ted Kennedy the most 'pro-gay rights' heterosexual male who has ever existed?
    
    Second, didn't Begala forget about lesbians or bisexuals?
chaussures air max 14 years ago

thank

Please log in to post comments

Nick Gillespie on RT Tonight, Talking About Pols & Media Circus

Latest

She Got a Permit for Her Chickens. Now the City Is Fining Her $80,000.

'We Can't Let These Sheep Go'

New Orleans City Council Considers Ordinance To Adopt Real-Time Facial Recognition Technology

Clarence Thomas Undermines Free Speech in Porn Site Age-Verification Case

America Has Plenty of Experience With Government-Run Stores, and It Isn't Pretty

Recommended

Login Form