Reason Writers Around Town on Air Traffic Controllers Falling Asleep on the Job
In today's Wall Street Journal, Reason Foundation's Director of Transportation Robert Poole and Langhorne Bond, former head of the FAA, write:
Between the aborted landing of Michelle Obama's plane at Andrews Air Force Base and a rash of sleeping air traffic controllers, air travelers must be wondering what's going on. The number of "operational errors" in which Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aircraft-separation standards were violated has nearly doubled since 2009.
…The FAA would not tolerate such threats to air safety from airlines, or from mechanics, or from aircraft producers. It regulates all such entities at arm's length—and it has cracked down on airline scheduling practices conducive to pilot fatigue. But the FAA has tolerated 2-2-1 schedules and dark control rooms for decades. Why? Because the Air Traffic Organization, whose job is to "move air traffic safely and efficiently," is within the FAA, which in effect means the agency is regulating itself.
The remedy for this is to separate air safety regulation from the provision of air traffic control services, so as to bring about true arm's-length safety regulation of air traffic control. That may sound like a radical change, but over the past 15 years nearly every developed country (except the U.S.) has made this change, consistent with policy set forth by the International Civil Aviation Organization.
There's another important reason for doing this now. The FAA is in the early stages of the biggest change in air traffic management since the introduction of radar in the 1950s. It's called the NextGen system. Using new technologies and process automation, NextGen will permit planes to fly closer together safely, adding much-needed capacity to airports and airspace. But this will require careful assessment of the trade-offs involved. The safety regulator making those assessments will have far more credibility if it is independent.
Poole's air traffic control research and commentary is online here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Adding more planes because they will be doing such a great job?
Sometimes, I'm glad we don't have flying cars.
Rather complaining about government doing a shitty job??!?!
You are such an iconoclast. No one can label you!!!
Adorable.
No one can label you
I think they have 😉
Audio of JFK control tower
Either there is some new disease going around that's suddenly causing ATCs to fall asleep on the job, or they've been sleeping on the job for decades and have just now started to get caught. One got caught and the media realized it makes a great scare story (the foundation of all American news media). "Your next plane flight may crash! Tune in tonight at ten to find out why!" Now every mere allegation, or even rumor of a ATC sleeping on the job is a front-page story. So which is mroe likely? A sudden rash of sleeping on the job, or a sudden rash of reporting on it? I say the latter is the only logical choice.
Indeed the only reason we don't have flying cars is because of human incompetence - we all know how bad the average driver is in two dimensions and at slow speed - imagine how bad it would be in three dimensions and at fast speed AND where every accident equals at least 2 deaths, falling from the sky, possibly onto you and your house. Flying cars will NEVER happen. Not as long as the earth's population is over, say 500,000 people, anyway.
It better happen; I need a flying taxi to save my ass
Maybe they have Obama's speeches televised next to the radar screen.
Cleaner is FAA approved
With a 2-2-1 schedule, they must have been sleeping on the job for decades. Or have taken drugs.
It reminds me of the summer of the shark back in 2001 where every single shark bite was the lead story. They created the impression that the number of shark attacks were increasing to epidemic levels, even though the total occurences and severity where below average that year.
You know, high speed trains don't need traffic controllers.
I believe this is an orchestrated attempt by the Obama administration to push their high speed train agenda. The next thing that will happen is that Obama will stage several airline crashes, or will make it look as if planes actually crashed through holographic imagery. Then, the government can suspend air travel and press for quick passage of the "High Speed Rail Emergency Appropriation Bill" with the support of both parties.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to buy another copy of Catcher In The Rye and get some brain gravy. If I never return, you'll know I was right.
Don't worry about your disappearance Vincent sloopyinca, 9/11 Truther will assume your mission; if the Jews don't get him first with their laser silencer...cue dramatic music
You're probably not serious, but trains of all speeds do need traffic control. Case in point, there was a fatal Metro crash in DC a year or so ago directly attributable to (IIRC) a failure in the system that kept a train from showing up in the control system.
If St. Ronald hadn't bulldozed over the air traffic controller strike back in the day, maybe they'd have some sane work rules.
11 comments in, and half of them are from known trolls.
You're missing "9/11 Truther" aren't you? He'll be back one day.
I sure hope I don't fall into that category. Mine's more of a spoof than a troll.
I could always do a ray LaHood limerick, though.
My bad -- hard to tell the difference between trolls and their imitators sometimes, heh.
Who the fuck are you again?
rectal's not a troll, she's a retarded blogwhore dipshit. You need to be more precise with your labeling.
Can't she be both? Embrace the diversity!
You're right. I was being too limited.
You are ineffectual 🙂
Whorbie with more bryllyant reesoning.
So your theory is that "staying awake" is an "insane work rule?"
You're a fucking tool.
I'm not commenting one way or the other on Reagan and the ATCs (becuase I don't know enough about it to make an informed comment), but a 2-2-1 schedule is pretty insane. The time off between shifts doesn't allow for enough time for adequate rest. Additionally, the constant changing between day, evening, and night shifts severely screws with circadian rhythms, so it's often difficult to get good restful sleep.
If St. Ronald hadn't bulldozed over the air traffic controller strike back in the day, maybe they'd have some sane work rules.
A President upholding the law (Taft-Hartley). Heaven-fucking-forfend.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ_E7Vce8vU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUoycVXw9ew
Please, for the love of god, somebody explain this video to me!
Hey, at least he didn't bow like he was his bitch.
The last time I checked, that was the correct movement for fellatio.
it is
All who participate in aviatin' must bow down to us!
OT:
The new firefox has gone apeshit on my computer so I am presently perpin' chrome.
Does anybody have the link to the h&r comment app? I can't seem to find it.
We've found you, 9/11 TRUTHER!
We've found you, 9/11 TRUTHER!
We've found you, 9/11 TRUTHER!
OT:
The new firefox has gone apeshit on my computer so I am presently perpin' chrome.
Does anybody have the link to the h&r comment app? I can't seem to find it.
Here you go, brother.....
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/fdbllkbadgaglaalokapjlkcagidcndj
(just in case you've got to type it in for some reason...)
There once was a poster named "l"
Whose browser crash put him in hell.
Cause he had to see rather
And all of her blather
But I hooked him up, now his life's swell.
Up and running, thanks man.
I am 28 years old and have an ear infection. Fuck you Jesus. You couldn't have died for our pain instead of our sins you bastard?
I, too, lost my faith when I suffered an ear infection.
I want to punch a hole in a wall, but my child like hands would not even make a dent.
I've found blaspheming the lord to be a helpful solution.
I lost it when I broke a nail but I don't feel terrible because I converted a Jew to Christianity.
At least, I think that's what happened when he screamed Jesus, Jesus, Jesus Christ I Love You!
The following night, the scene repeated but instead of rather, Tony was the one attaching an egg to his ass. Over the next two weeks, Retard gave birth to fourteen eggs and fourteen girls became hosts for the green spheres. After the impregnation, rather and the girls presented all the normal characteristics of a pregnant woman. They had a difficult time trying to hide their state from the school personnel. The embryo growing inside their bodies provoked aggressive orgasm on daily basis. These climax exertions left the girls totally spent but they couldn't wait to experience to next one. They had to be careful not to be caught shivering in a rather public place like the cafeteria, since their secret would be uncovered.
Retard finally started eating, but her only food source was the girl's full breasts. She sucked eagerly on the girl's nipples, often helping to bring the impending orgasm of the day.
Four weeks later, rather's pregnancy period was completed. She was in the middle of a blissful orgasm when suddenly her pussy poured out a great amount of slime, followed by a greenish bag the size of a cucumber. The bag ripped open as it touched the ground and to reveal a small plant.. It was an exact tiny replica of rather's plant; an orange-size green ball with a small rosy tube extending out.
At last, the purpose of the whole process became evident to rather. The plant was unmistakable a male and it had a complicated way to use alien forms, in this case women, to reproduce itself. Retard was the plant's female partner; created resembling her alien hosts to blend perfectly in the community. Once the plant entirely filled Retard's body with its greenish sperm, she would be responsible to give birth to the embryos. And finally the embryos will grow inside any woman's womb, since fourteen embryos would never fit inside Retard's body, no matter how much it could expand.
When Retard's sperm supply was empty, she just made another visit to her male in the eastern wing and the breeding process started again. In the following weeks all the women in the building, including teachers, cooks, and cleaning staff, were part of the cycle.
Several months later
Two girls were walking outside the school grounds and looked at the garden on the other side of the fence.
"Look a those beautiful plants! Let's buy one!" One of the girls said to the other as she pointed to a set of Retardpots perfectly aligned near the main gate.
The small plants were growing like a normal earth plant. A sign was placed next to the plants that read: "Exotic plants for sale".
The End.
The following night, the scene repeated but instead of rather, Tony was the one attaching an egg to his ass. Over the next two weeks, Retard gave birth to fourteen eggs and fourteen girls became hosts for the green spheres. After the impregnation, rather and the girls presented all the normal characteristics of a pregnant woman. They had a difficult time trying to hide their state from the school personnel. The embryo growing inside their bodies provoked aggressive orgasm on daily basis. These climax exertions left the girls totally spent but they couldn't wait to experience to next one. They had to be careful not to be caught shivering in a rather public place like the cafeteria, since their secret would be uncovered.
Retard finally started eating, but her only food source was the girl's full breasts. She sucked eagerly on the girl's nipples, often helping to bring the impending orgasm of the day.
Four weeks later, rather's pregnancy period was completed. She was in the middle of a blissful orgasm when suddenly her pussy poured out a great amount of slime, followed by a greenish bag the size of a cucumber. The bag ripped open as it touched the ground and to reveal a small plant.. It was an exact tiny replica of rather's plant; an orange-size green ball with a small rosy tube extending out.
At last, the purpose of the whole process became evident to rather. The plant was unmistakable a male and it had a complicated way to use alien forms, in this case women, to reproduce itself. Retard was the plant's female partner; created resembling her alien hosts to blend perfectly in the community. Once the plant entirely filled Retard's body with its greenish sperm, she would be responsible to give birth to the embryos. And finally the embryos will grow inside any woman's womb, since fourteen embryos would never fit inside Retard's body, no matter how much it could expand.
When Retard's sperm supply was empty, she just made another visit to her male in the eastern wing and the breeding process started again. In the following weeks all the women in the building, including teachers, cooks, and cleaning staff, were part of the cycle.
Several months later
Two girls were walking outside the school grounds and looked at the garden on the other side of the fence.
"Look a those beautiful plants! Let's buy one!" One of the girls said to the other as she pointed to a set of Retardpots perfectly aligned near the main gate.
The small plants were growing like a normal earth plant. A sign was placed next to the plants that read: "Exotic plants for sale".
The End.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
I was so relieved when you took off your clothes and you didn't have a dick.
Dendrophilia, you couldn't even be published in a ESL free tree fucking blog.
Please send me your kindergarten work and I will edit the shit out of it.
I need to protect my brand
You were dead on, until the last line. Then, milk shot out of my nose. And I haven't drunk any milk for at least 24 hours.
Whoever wrote the reason app, thank you.
Awesome, I should have went with chrome a long time ago.
All them there tweeter and myface gadgets significantly slowed this site down, running much faster without all of the bullshit.
It's me. Thanks appreciated.
Good, then I assume you use it and it won't hurt your feelings to say I think you are in my top five boring posters and I can never remember a think about after I've read you
Bryan, I love that you received the KKK Robert C. Byrd Scholarship
Good, then I assume you use it and it won't hurt your feelings to say I think you are in my top five boring posters and I can never remember a think about after I've read you
Bryan, I love that you received the KKK Robert C. Byrd Scholarship
Well this is ironic. I saw a picture of the the guy at wonkette who did the whole thing about Palin's retarded kid. It appears he has down's himself.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/g.....055112074/
Why am I not surprised that a fat ginger neckbeard would bag on a retarded kid?
This guything again? Didn't we already rip on himit some time back?
http://www.outsidethebeltway.c.....-dearborn/
Is it just me or does Terry Jones look like the old man on American Chopper. And thank Dearborn, Michigan for making this assclown a free speech martyr.
He does look like an atrophied Paul Sr.
Regarding the link, are you fucking kidding me? What sort of shit is this?
The guy was put on trial for a proposed protest, that maybe, possibly, in at least one dimension of the multiverse, could lead to violence. We don't know that their will be violence, because it hasn't happened yet, but this make no mistake, it could happen.
So where's the police chief's report on the arrest of those who threatened seriously?
Yemen president finally steps down.
3 down? How many to go?
That is the good news. The bad news is that the VP is some guy named Bin Ladin.
China fucks with Easter
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/.....tml?hpt=T1
They are Godless communist thugs
No respect! Unlike, my two Easter posts
http://rctlfy.wordpress.com/
Uh oh! fart. LOL
Jess
http://www.anon-lol.com
Jesus could raise the dead. Jesus could fly.
Jesus could pay off the US national debt! Now that's a miracle.
Yeah that is kinda crazy dude,
http://www.complete-privacy.au.tc
The Constitution is only "ink on parchment". It means only what political expedience says it means!
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/.....ntPage=all
Beware "Common Sense"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....ory_1.html
In its current political form, "common sense" is intended to telegraph two related messages: Ordinary people know better, especially compared with overeducated, smooth-talking experts and insiders. And governing works best when it is rooted in everyday experience...
The political appeal to common sense is thus best understood not as a call for clearheaded solutions but rather as a form of pandering ? an effort by pundits and politicians to channel real popular anger and to lather voters with collective flattery.
There is some truth to the idea that the world is not as simple as it sounds. But there is also some truth the the idea that convoluted explinations and justifications are not a sign of intelligence but a sign of a desire to avoid the simpler but uncomfortable truth.
You can get in trouble either way. But, it hasn't been too much common sense that has gotten us into trouble the last twenty years. It has been experts who have used convoluted explinations to convince people of foolish things. It wasn't the common sense crowd who convinced America that home prices would never fall or that college degrees are worth financial ruin in the form of student loans or that we could endlessly spend money we don't have. It was the "experts" who have told us those things. The Washington Post, being along with the NYT, the official newpaper of the expert class avoids such facts and instead rails on "common sense". Like common sense populism, whatever its faults and dangers, have caused the disasters that have befallen us.
I dunno, it was kind of "common sense" that home values would keep increasing. A lot of "commons sense" folks I knew would say "invest in real estate, that never goes down!" An amazing amount of people when given the choice of where they wanted their retirement money invested would choose real estate on that idea.
Fair enough. Real estate was kind of a mass hysteria. But, the genuiuses running the big banks believed the same things. So, at best it is a draw.
I dunno, it was kind of "common sense" that home values would keep increasing.
Not really.
What i kept hearing was what goes up must come down and i work in the industry.
In fact I told people outside the industry that it must come down.
The problem was that I could not articulate why it would come down...so it was ignored.
"Ordinary people know better, especially compared with overeducated, smooth-talking experts and insiders. And governing works best when it is rooted in everyday experience..."
Name a single American institution that is better today than it was 20 years ago? The best I can think of it the military and it is at best a tie and many would say worse. The schools are worse, the courts are worse, the banks and large corporations are worse, the government by anyone's measure is certainly run worse today. Yet, the Washington Post would have us believe that the people running these institutions know what they are doing. No, they really don't. This is the age of dilbert. The people who run our institutions are either incompetant corrupt or both. The stark reality no doubt hurts the people at the Washington Post, especially since they are the insiders in one of our sickest and dying institutions the media. But that is reality. Who knows about the ability of ordinary people. But we do know about the ability of our experts, it is horrible. They pretty much destroy everything they touch.
20 years ago? I'm not sure we are worse off than we were in 1990. Savings and loan, recession. That was pre-Gulf War, our military had yet to regain much prestige. NAEP scores for our schools were not better then.
I submit this is a problem with "common sense" it too often allows nostalgia to trump empirical reality.
The things that happened in the 00s, Enron and the Banking collapse of 08, are much worse than the S&L crisis.
Also, it was about 30 years ago when our public debt started skyrocketing. I guess it was those Reagan era elites...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USDebt.png
". Yet, the Washington Post would have us believe"
And dude, you should really watch that hasty generalization thing. This is the opinion of a person that wrote an op-ed for the WaPo, she's not otherwise affiliated with them, she's a history professor from UVA. Today's Op-Eds in the WaPo include an anti-Obama piece from the right (someone from AEI) and one from the left (UC Hastings).
This is another problem with the "experts destroying us" meme. The "experts" are a pretty divided bunch, just like the "common sense" Americans.
I would have to say teh farming industry is better today than ever before.
1. Tractor technology, including GPS operation, fuel efficiency, more reliable equipment, etc has improved.
2. Genetic modification has both decreased blight and created new and robust hybrids, yet it is derided by morons in other fields.
3. Irrigation technology has improved to the point that water is not wasted as often when reserves fall.
4. Soil sciences have improved, allowing farmers to change crops more frequently, and safely, when commodity prices dramatically shift. (See California's central valley for perfect examples of guys able to switch on the fly to cotton over the last 2-3 years.)
Those are the main areas, and they heve improved by leaps and bounds in the past two decades. Now, if the clowns at the EPA and the idiots protesting GMO (elites and elitists) would leave it to the common man (the farmer), the progress would continue.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess educated elites had more to do with advances in tractor & irrigation technology, genetic modification of crops, and soil sciences than with "common man" everyday farmers.
Those weren't the so-called elites. They were common-sense-applying scientists who work for companies in the industry. Deere and Case employ scientists who work hand in hand with farmers to make more efficient machines.
Look at a new chopper compared to a 20 year old chopper. The old one cost around $500k new and so does the one out today. The new one clears acreage twice as fast and with considerably less waste and 2/3 less pollution. All of these advances came before the EPA threatened emmissions regulation.
Those weren't "elites." They were private-sector scientists doing what their customers needed (and their shareholders demanded) of them.
The elites are the yo-yo's who protest GMO's at the G20 meetings because elitists at universities with no agriculture backgrounds tell then they are evil and dangerous with nary a shred of scientific evidence. These foods can feed the world, yet the environmentalists are such Gaia-worshipping fuckheads, they force-feed distortions to the weak minded to move their agenda of population control.
As far as soil sciences and the other topics, name me one elitist who actually has solutions to these problems. The problems are all solved in the free market, by their scientists for their customers. The elites at universities are too busy pointing out what's so wrong and evil that they can't look for solutions and increases in efficiency. It is beneath them, so it is left to the common scientists who are employed by companies such as Monsanto, John Deere, Case, New Holland, Grimway Farms and Harris Ranch.
Go to the World Ag Expo sometime and talk to the scientists who give lectures there. These are people reacting to market demand and are plain-spoken, common people with above average IQ's. They work for solutions to benefit all. The elites at universities and in government see it as a zero-sum game, where for someone to benefit, someone else must be punished.
See: Occam.
"Those weren't the so-called elites. They were common-sense-applying scientists who work for companies in the industry. "
Yeah, they were not elites, just everyday common man PhD research scientists...
Yeah. You're way off. PhD Research scientists working at Deere to develop tractors? Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's just not the case.
The only thing I brought up above where you may be marginally correct is in the area of GMO's. Unfortunately, academia's social "sciences" tend to dismiss them as dangerous with no real scientific data to support their fear-mongering.
GPS tech, fuel efficiency and irrigation systems development happen in the field with real farms and farmers doing the research in conjunction with the manufacturers. In no way, shape or form does academia play a role in their development other than to stifle their development through lobbying, inaccurate studies (as the ones at UC-Davis that wrongfully predicted silt displacement in the SJV) and scare tactics aimed at politicians and not at farmers.
Seriously, this is an area I know infinitely better than you. You don't want to have this argument.
You don't think research done in and/or by academia (such as the many public institutions like Teaxas A&M and such) has had any connection to genetically modified crops, GPS technology, soil science breakthroughs, etc? That's rich.
And how are 'elite' social scientists relevant in the GMO debate?
Wow, I'm an elite and I don't even know it. How did that happen?
Strangely, my elite status doesn't seem to matter when I go to city council meetings or even meetings about asinine smoking restrictions on my own camus.
"asinine smoking restrictions on my own camus"
Camus was a big smoker I hear, but restrictions on a dead guy, wow.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess educated elites had more to do with advances in tractor & irrigation technology
On tractor and irrigation technology you would be wrong.
also it would be pretty hard to find a farmer who was not college educated.
You distinction of elite vs common sense folk is pretty weird.
Essentially you are saying college educated who is associated with an academic or government institution is an elite and the rest of us who have college educations yet are not associated with academic or government are not members of the elite.
Then you conflate the issue even more claiming that non-academic or government innovations are products of elites and not common sense.
Then you complicate the matter further because it is obvious that academic and government "elites" ignore well know facts about economic issues.
One good example of this is the persistent denial of the Law of Comparative advantage. The law is such common knowledge that most people don't even call it by its name. They simply fumble around trying to describe it.
Yet academic and government elites intentionally ignore it.
In essence an "elite" developed discovery that is nearly 200 years old has over time become "common sense". Yet who you claim to be elite ignore it and call those who espouse that truth of it "common."
Minge doesn't get it. That's why he never responds when someone refutes his utter bullshit.
"Essentially you are saying college educated who is associated with an academic or government institution is an elite and the rest of us who have college educations yet are not associated with academic or government are not members of the elite."
I'm saying that? It's you guys who have the following strange definition of an elite: Someone in the government or academe. WTF?
I'm sorry but a highly paid, highly educated research scientist fits nicely in the real world 'common sense' conception of an elite. You just want to define 'elite' to mean 'people from institutions I don't like!'
"Elite" is commonly understood to mean people with privileged personal access to power. Your average research PhD isn't going to fall into that category.
Er, neither is your average PhD social scientists in academe.
elite noun \?-?l?t, i-, ?-\
Definition of ELITE
1a singular or plural in construction : the choice part : cream b singular or plural in construction : the best of a class c singular or plural in construction : the socially superior part of society d : a group of persons who by virtue of position or education exercise much power or influence
A PhD research scientist at a major company is going to be in the second category (top achievers in a field, about 2% or less of the population has such a terminal degree) and in relevant areas they will also satisfy the last category too (they are the kind whose research is referenced at Congressional hearings and such)
College and post-grad educated people != elites. A college education is A requirement, not the SOLE requirement.
Yeah, the other requirment seems to be that they work for institutions you don't like, as opposed to people with the same background and educations working for instiutions you like.
Yeah.
Or people who have politicians under their thumbs...
If it makes you feel any better, MNG, I don't consider you to be elite.
Raising Taxes on the Rich is Unfair
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....ory_1.html
Conservatives have long stayed away from fairness debates, preferring to build unemotional arguments on the right angles of economic efficiency. This is a lost opportunity. Advocates for limited government can win the fairness argument in a walk.
In general, when resources are perceived as unearned, people think it fair that they be split up somewhat evenly. But when merit is involved, people believe it is fair to reward it with more money...
In 2006, the World Values Survey asked a large sample of Americans to imagine two secretaries with the same job but one earning considerably more. However, the higher-paid secretary is "quicker, more efficient and more reliable." The survey asked whether a pay difference between the two was fair. About 89 percent said the gap was fair, while about 11 percent said it was unfair.
Of course, for this example to translate into a fair economic system, both secretaries must have the opportunity to develop their skills.
Wrong Words to Woo Working-class Whites
Early in his address on the deficit this month, the president noted, "?'There but for the grace of God go I,' we say to ourselves," and therefore we support social programs for the poor, the sick and the elderly.
This phrase accurately summarizes African Americans' attitude toward the poor, according to a study by Harvard sociologist Mich?le Lamont published in 2000. Working-class blacks tend to be less antigovernment, more receptive to social programs and less judgmental of the poor...White working-class voters see the world very differently; they are more likely to be true believers in equal opportunity than to link poverty with social injustice. These families are less inclined to think, "There but for the grace of God go I" and more inclined to attribute poverty to a life of impulse, chaos and a lack of discipline stemming from individual choices.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....ory_1.html
This phrase accurately summarizes African Americans' attitude toward the poor, according to a study by Harvard sociologist Mich?le Lamont published in 2000. Working-class blacks tend to be less antigovernment pro-government, more receptive to receivers of social programs wealth redistribution schemes and less judgmental of the poor...White working-class voters see the world very differently; they are more likely to be true believers in equal opportunity than to link poverty with social injustice. These families are less inclined to think, "There but for the grace of God go I" and more inclined to attribute poverty success to a life of impulse, chaos and a lack of discipline deliberation, order and discipline stemming from individual choices.
I wonder which comment the NYT or real editorial board at WaPo would consider racist. That study basically says blacks can't control themselves. It sinhould be an indictment on the black leaders in America and their endless victimization of black America for their own gain, but instead will be Exhibit A to show whites as "selfish" in the upcoming race war also known as Decision 2012.
Working class blacks are probably pretty anti-government when it comes to cops.
Everybody subject to government power is a little libertarian. We are just libertarian in more ways, and different ones.
I'd like to agree, but there are a lot of people out there that throw out that "cost of a civilized society" bullshit pretty regularly.
IMO, most people only become libertarian when they've been fucked over by the government, and they lose their libertarianism once the government does something in return (in their mind) like send them a tax refund.
I don't know. I'd bet that if you asked enough questions you'd find in most people an area where they resent government interference. The trick may be as simple as getting them to expand that reasoning to more and more fields.
If by "trick," you mean impossible task, then I would agree with you.
And I say this with equal parts seriousness and sadness.
There are many times I share your pessimism.
This statement assumes that there are very few white people who accept government cheese, and I think it's safe to say that that's bullshit.
Good lord you are reading a lot into that!
White working-class voters see the world very differently; they are more likely to be true believers in equal opportunity than to link poverty with social injustice.
What about those of us who link being less rich then the richest people on the planet with government intervention?
note: Strictly speaking are there any poor in the US?
Go to Eastern KY and you tell me.
Though I will admit that they still live better than "African poor" or "favela poor".
There are no poor people just like there are no short people.
Dude, 'poor' is not some absolute term.
Tell that to the person who is considered wealthy in an eastern Afghani village and then show him a picture of the poor guy in Appalachia with a trailer, car, cellphone and full belly. Then ask him if there's an absolute definition.
Er, you realize you just undercut your point and proved mine, right? "Poor" is relative to certain cultures.
the higher-paid secretary is "quicker, more efficient and more reliable."
In other words, not a member of a union.
I tried to read that New Yorker link about the Constitution, but succumbed to tedium well before the half-way mark. Did whoever wrote it actually have some sort of point, or was it all just senile rambling?
I was basically paragraph after paragraph of strawmen (of right- and left-wing interpretations), interspersed with historical facts and subtle-like-a-shark editorializing.
*It
Conclusion to NYer piece:
Being laid up in a hospital bed hopped up on morphine will allow a man to endure Hugh levels of tedium.
High levels...
Morphine and all.
At first glance, the cloud promises equal access to all ? the great leveler of men and nations. But the substance of the cloud is nonresidential, ephemeral, and beyond any single user's control. As such, it does equalize us ? under the yoke of corporate masters who control the cloud.*
Teh horror!
* The Christian Science Monitor was once a truly great paper. Now, it is teh suckfest.
I'm not what you'd call a Michelle Malkin fan, but I just stumbled across this little tidbit.
Trump has attempted to use the same tactics in Connecticut and has championed the reviled Kelo vs. City of New London Supreme Court ruling upholding expansive use of eminent domain. He told Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto that he agreed with the ruling "100 percent" and defended the chilling power of government to kick people out of their homes and businesses based on arbitrary determinations:
"The fact is, if you have a person living in an area that's not even necessarily a good area, and government, whether it's local or whatever, government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and make (an) area that's not good into a good area, and move the person that's living there into a better place ? now, I know it might not be their choice ? but move the person to a better place and yet create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good."
If he's in favor of the crony capitalist high speed gravy train, Trump has a shot.
It's amazing how many people can claim to believe in a free market except for their industry.
Most of these projects have to make economic sense for companies and would thus be built somewhere, and if not they're only funded by extracting money from people that would have wound up creating (likely more productive) jobs anyway. Pointless displacement and wealth transfers.
But yes, The Donald shows the kind of pragmatism -- near-total ideological malleability -- people would like to see in a President.
The problem with pragmatists is that you have to be clear who they're pragmatic for.
Trump, Obama, and the whole rogues gallery are definite pragmatists when it comes to their own interests.
He's probably trying to cover his ass for the inevitable accusation that he made money off of stolen land.
I tremble for my country when I reflect on the 2012 presidential election.
A couple of Baptist firebrands, a Henry Clay fanboy, some Evangelicals and a Mormon. What could go wrong?
Great comment on Althouse today regading some stupid Kevin Smith tweet about making a zombie Jesus movie.
"Well, Smith's career's pretty much been living dead for a while. Jersey Girl? Red State? clerks 2? That rotting carcass of a Superman script? How long can he live off the entrails of Chasing Amy?"
The truth really does hurt.
He did do Zach & Miri. Also, I wouldn't lump Clerks II in with those other turds. It possibly had the best Lord Of The Rings analysis ever.
Let alone the Porch Monkey scene.
Ah. It was pretty funny. Not as funny as the Clerks contractor law of war Return of the Jedi scene. The difference in funny between the Return of the Jedi contractor scene in Clerks and that scene in Clerks to pretty much shows Smith isn't what he used to be.
and you just referenced a movie with Seth Rogan as being good. Your dead to me Slopy. Seth Rogan? What next, Michael Cera?
Rogen was in 3 funny movies. The 40-Year Old Virgin, Step Brothers, and Observe and Report were quite good, IMO. Although Zach and Miri wasn't that good, it was infinitely better than Jersey Girl or Red State. Two films that were so bad, I can't speak their names without throwing up a little bit.
As far as Michael Cera goes, the world would be a better place had his mother not shit him out 22+ years ago.
It possibly had the best Lord Of The Rings analysis ever.
Huh?
That was not even good let alone the best. That was simply incoherent.
His best work was a speech he gave at some convention about his work on superman.
Probably didn't even get payed for it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgYhLIThTvk
He released a video of him doing Q&A at a few colleges, so yeah, I'm pretty sure he got paid for it.
The last 8-10 minutes was pretty funny.
I take it you are neither a Star Wars geek (guilty here for original trilogy) or a LOTR dork (meh-the books were great, movies average). If you were, you'd either love or hate that scene.
I've always thought Kevin Smith's derivative comedy is stellar. His original stuff, not so much. Case in point: Brodie/TS in Mallrats vs virtually any scenes in