Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

"Way to almost ruin Mad Men for me, guys."

Matt Welch | 3.10.2011 3:12 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

So says beloved Hit & Run commenter Dagny T., in reference to this bit of high-speed rail agitprop:

Reason.tv has a different take on high-speed rail…

… and on Mad Men!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Will Scalia's Angry Dissents Win the Future?

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyCultureTelevisionReason.tvMoviesTrains
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fiscal Meth   14 years ago

    I guess I can finally stop worrying about when I'm gonna find time to watch this Mad Men show everybody's always raving about.

  2. Paranoid Android   14 years ago

    So was the irony of using, for propaganda purposes, characters from a show that tries to illustrate the ways in which advertising can be manipulative just totally lost on the makers of this commercial?

    1. heller   14 years ago

      Also the irony of depicting 60s folk talking about how popular and profitable high speed rail was going to be.

      1. Number 2   14 years ago

        Peter Campbell is an account executive. Why is he designing an ad campaign?

  3. SugarFree   14 years ago

    Woo! Dagny with the hat-tip!

    1. ?   14 years ago

      She's famous!

  4. ?   14 years ago

    1) I DON'T HAAAAAAAAVE A TV

    B) What little big-media self-advertisement I see nowadays seems almost exclusively to appeal to its target demo by announcing what demo the product excludes. Not-loving-the-train is an obvious excluded-group characteristic. "Yeah, fuck those guys! They don't get it. PALIN"

    That's a respectable independent exploitation-art marketing strategy, but as the dominant-culture default, it's kind of frightening.

    It's...Wagnerian.

    ?) I've heard that the quickest route to not being able to enjoy Mad Men is knowing the titty-girl actress in it personally. Supposedly, she's a ridiculously stereotypical Cali bimbo/idiot/asshole/titty-girl/etc. in real life.

    If she doesn't play a retarded doll on the show, she's a good actress.

    1. SugarFree   14 years ago

      An actress whose stupid in real life? [gasp]

      Next you'll tell me that most actors aren't all that bright either!

    2. Mike Laursen   14 years ago

      Hey, she was "Our Miss Reynolds". Therefore she can do no wrong. Don't be a hater.

      1. Mike Laursen   14 years ago

        Err, Mrs. Reynolds.

  5. Cyto   14 years ago

    I think the irony was lost on them when they said that "trains get you where you want to go". I think that is pretty much exactly the argument against trains - they don't go where I want and they don't go when I want. And some how "trains are the most economical" is claimed, yet we need massive subsidies for them to cost only slightly more than flying.

    1. DJF   14 years ago

      The way some of the train fanatics make it sound is that cars and roads will disappear and we will all ride high speed trains. When asked, how do you plan to get to the train station they then mumble about trolleys. When asked if you are going to have trolleys running everywhere they then mentioned busses and taxis. When you point out that busses and taxis run on roads and roads have been abolished they then say that you are paid by oil industry.

  6. R C Progressive   14 years ago

    Less talking. More Christina Hendricks.

    1. DesigNate   14 years ago

      And January Jones in that flower dress, oww!

      1. joshua corning   14 years ago

        I has always been about Alison Brie.

        The added bonus is that she is also in the cast of Community.

        1. Honest Libertarian   14 years ago

          Not that there is anything right with that.

          1. Honest Libertarian   14 years ago

            Not that I would not like to sample that Brie.

      2. Trespassers W   14 years ago

        "Yay. Another generic blond white girl. I must be in heaven."

        http://www.wwtdd.com/2011/01/january-jones-really/

  7. Cyto   14 years ago

    To buttress my point, I checked for a ticket on Amtrack on a route that I fly routinely - Ft. Lauderdale to Atlanta. There are probably a dozen flights each day from each of 3 separate airports within an hour of Ft Lauderdale. Flight time is about an hour and a half, on average. The good price is anything under $150 round trip.

    What does Amtrak offer? Well, I randomly picked Wednesday, March 23 for my trip, returning on Thursday. I chose "anytime" to see what they'd have available.

    There were exactly two options:

    For $256 I can leave on the 92 Silverstar at 12:30 pm on Wednesday, arriving in Washington DC at 3:14 pm on Thursday. At 6:30 pm on Thursday I board the 19 Crescent which arrives in Atlanta on Friday at 8:30 AM.

    Total "flight time" of wow... 44 hours. slightly north of the 1.5 hours of air travel. Which is offered several times per day.

    Oh, there was one other option with Amtrak. I can save a few bucks by taking the same 12:30 Wednesday 92 Silverstar but getting off in Raleigh, NC at 8:30 am Thursday. Then I take the 79 Carolinian to Charlotte where I wait to pick up the same 19 Crescent from the more expensive trip at 2:30 am. I'll still arrive in Atlanta at 8:30 am on Friday, but I'll only have to shell out $164.

    Yeah, trains are way, way, way better than cars and planes. That much is self-evident....

    1. sevo   14 years ago

      Choo-choos:
      http://www.brasstrains.com/Cla.....ly-Skirted
      Hey, and it's 'modern'!

    2. #   14 years ago

      don't forget that the real price is even higher - those are tax subsidized tickets.

    3. Mainer   14 years ago

      And to further amplify the point...

      The wife and I have checked taking the train from Maine to visit family in Colorado. We find the same thing you did. Incredibly inconvenient times and connections (a 4 hour layover in Chicago from 4:00 am to 8:00 am IIRC), way way longer than flying, and MORE expensive. Last time we checked, we figured out we could drive the 2000 miles faster than the train would get us there.

  8. Almanian   14 years ago

    I feel bad for Dagny. Sad face 🙁

  9. Steve   14 years ago

    Man, a whole 1965 dollar. They high-balled that estimate along with ridership: today that $1.00 a gallon gas would be more than $8.40.

    1. commenter53   14 years ago

      Why would they be referring to 1965 dollars. People tend to refer to nominal dollars, (saying things like you could of bought this house for $10000 30 years ago, not taking into account inflation adjustments) They grossly underestimated the decline in value of the US dollar over the last 45 years.

  10. Mog   14 years ago

    Did no one catch the irony of the bumper sticker you put on your CAR saying you support rail. Really?

  11. Russ 2000   14 years ago

    You mean a reasonably intelligent woman not figuring out she hadn't had her period for several months didn't kill Mad Men for you in Season 1??

    1. joshua corning   14 years ago

      She knew she was pregnant...she just intentionally denied it.

      Saying she did not know is like saying Don did not know his real name was Dick.

  12. air max france   14 years ago

    wow,so nice

  13. chaussures puma   14 years ago

    good

  14. Publius Cato   14 years ago

    I am not much a fan of regional rail; it requires too much additional investment to be viable. But I have to say I am relatively pleased with my local subway. Granted, I would love to know why it costs $2.25 pus tax subsidies, seriously WTF?!

  15. Brett   14 years ago

    I thought they should have a story line around Dangerous at Any Speed. Pete buys a brand new Oldsmobile, later he is appraoched by GM about doing a saftey campaign in the wake of Ralph Nader's Dangerous at Any Speed. Pete after reading the book decides its ture and learns that European cars are safer so he buys a Volvo 122. Later on Pete leaves the keys in his car and a some minor character steals his car drunk and rolls it and (after trying to avoid a 1963 Corvair) and we see Pete at the funeral driving a 1966 Corvair.

  16. smartman   13 years ago

    Wow, I understand the title of this article now. That Mad Men video was way to much information, but i'm still curious to see whether or not he will be right.

  17. mansmart   13 years ago

    I understand the title of this article now. That Mad Men video was way to much information, but i'm still curious to see whether or not he will be right though.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!