Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Morning Links: Gitmo Trials To Resume, Ensign Retires, New Government in Egypt

Radley Balko | 3.8.2011 7:48 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Obama orders Gitmo trials resumed. 
  • Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) announces retirement.
  • Egypt swears in a new government.
  • Former Gitmo prosecutor: U.S. human rights lecturing rings hollow.
  • Bill Gates no longer the world's richest man.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Real Lesson from Wisconsin

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (236)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Anonypussy?   14 years ago

    Gentlemen (and lady), start your links!

    1. JOhnny MAckson   14 years ago

      First!!1! LOL

      Jess
      http://www.anonz.com

      1. Anonypussy?   14 years ago

        Cheater.

  2. John   14 years ago

    http://blogs.wsj.com/economics.....07-slides/

    Last month's deficit was bigger than the deficit for the entire year of 2007.

    1. Jordan Elliot   14 years ago

      Saw this on Drudge yesterday. Crazy.

    2. Ben Bernanke   14 years ago

      Meh. Last month's dollar is worth more, uh, less, is different than 2007 dollars.

    3. Mike M.   14 years ago

      Thank goodness the republicans just cut a whopping four billion dollars of spending. They only have to do that 55 more times to cover the February deficit.

      1. John   14 years ago

        Hey, lets not get draconian here or anything.

      2. Vermont Gun Owner   14 years ago

        Thank goodness the republicans just cut a whopping four billion dollars of spending.

        SOMALIA!

      3. Tulpa   14 years ago

        If you can't save pennies, you'll never save dollars.

  3. John   14 years ago

    http://legalinsurrection.blogs.....-guns.html

    Palin's parents the subject of fairly serious death threats.

    1. Matrix   14 years ago

      That can't be! Leftists are non-violent. Only the right uses violence to get their way. JARED LOUGHNER!! OMGWTFROFLCOPTER!!!!1one!1!11!!

      1. hmm   14 years ago

        WTFBBQ would have been more appropriate.

        1. Matrix   14 years ago

          ?.? my roflknife demands blood!

          1. hmm   14 years ago

            Just point out how flippant roflcopter is and how it seems awkward in this setting.

            1. hmm   14 years ago

              The meta "one" was quit classy btw, nice work.

  4. Montani Semper Liberi   14 years ago

    Looks like Wall St. found their fall guy. Notice that the Goldman executive who is at the center of this isn't facing any charges. It's good to be the king.

    1. DJF   14 years ago

      It's a crime in the US to steal secrets from Goldman Sachs.

      Goldman Sachs stealing from the taxpayers is public policy.

      1. Rhet Orical   14 years ago

        What law(s) did GS break? Be specific.

        1. Rich   14 years ago

          And while you're at it, please define "insider trading".

          1. DJF   14 years ago

            It appears to be defined as "if you are an employee of Goldman Sachs and steal secrets from Goldman Sachs and give those secrets to someone else outside of Goldman Sachs" then its insider trading.

        2. DJF   14 years ago

          Where did I say that Goldman Sachs broke any law?

          I said that the person who is charged with breaking the law stole secrets from GS

          As to what Goldman Sachs did, it was all perfectly legal since stealing from the taxpayers with politicians permission is legal.

  5. Melinda   14 years ago

    Bill Gates no longer the world's richest man.

    I'm out the door

    1. Bill G.   14 years ago

      No worries, I've been up to my elbows in underage Asian prostitutes for years.

      1. Underage Asian Prostitute   14 years ago

        Yeah, but your arms are short, so it doesn't hurt too bad. Besides, I'm a libertarian. 12 is only "underage" in America.

    2. sloopyinca   14 years ago

      Bill Gates no longer the world's richest man.

      Meet the new one. And Sprint will merge with KFC to become the worlds largest corporation by the end of the year.

      1. generic Brand   14 years ago

        "I'm going to reinvest my money into the community... PSYCH!!!"

        Haha, damn why did Dave Chappelle have to go the more subtle Charlie Sheen route? (i.e. throw it all away)

  6. John   14 years ago

    http://thehill.com/homenews/ad.....-detainees

    Obama to resume military commissions. Suckers!!!

    1. MNG   14 years ago

      Mr. Obama said in a statement that he remained committed to closing Guant?namo someday and to charging some terrorism suspects in civilian criminal courts. But Congress has blocked the transfer of prisoners from Guant?namo to the United States for trial, frustrating the administration's plan to hold civilian trials for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-professed chief plotter of the Sept. 11 attacks, and others accused of terrorism.

      1. Brett L   14 years ago

        So you prefer to believe Obama ineffective rather than duplicitous? Okay. Personally I'm not ready to limit myself to one or the other.

        1. MNG   14 years ago

          Separation of powers, how does it work?

          1. hmm   14 years ago

            You're missin' the funckin'

          2. gaijin97   14 years ago

            Exactly what Obama should have been asking himself before making promises his Executive Branch alone can't keep.

            1. John   14 years ago

              But he was the editor of Harvard Law Review. He is erudite. How could he not have know this? Or was he just lying he ass off knowing people like MNG would believe him no matter what he said?

              1. Underage Asian Prostitute   14 years ago

                MNG isn't the only gullible person here.

                1. Ken Ardd   14 years ago

                  Fun fact: The word "gullible" is not in any (English) dictionary.

                  1. Lord Humungus   14 years ago

                    I'm willing to give an asian prostitute a break.

                  2. Almanian   14 years ago

                    You lie!

                  3. MNG   14 years ago

                    *shakes fist*

              2. DJF   14 years ago

                I don't blame Obama, his teleprompter lied to him.

              3. David Brooks   14 years ago

                HIS PANTS WERE CREASED PERFECTLY! WHAT WAS I SUPPOSED TO THINK?

          3. Really?   14 years ago

            Were you asleep from 2008-2010?

      2. hmm   14 years ago

        The President seemed to have a lot more backbone when he was pushing healthcare...

        I guess his priorities are a little clearer now.

      3. Enough About Palin   14 years ago

        "Someday"

        In many ways, they'll miss the good old days
        Someday, someday
        Yeah, it hurts to say, but I want you to stay
        Sometimes, sometimes

        When we was young, oh man, did we have fun
        Always, always
        Promises, they break before they're made
        Sometimes, sometimes

        http://www.lyrics007.com/The Strokes Lyrics/Someday Lyrics.html

      4. Tulpa   14 years ago

        Congress (and the federal courts) have blocked a shit-ton of liberal causes, and the administration just ignores them. Offshore drilling moratoria, Obamacare, CO2 rationing, etc.

    2. Politifact   14 years ago

      Promise kept!

  7. Restoras   14 years ago

    Wait, how can you have trials in Gitmo when it's closed?

    1. DJF   14 years ago

      Maybe he is going to outsource it to the Cubans. I hear they have a great conviction rate.

    2. Vermont Gun Owner   14 years ago

      We've got to do something with all that empty space.

      1. Almanian   14 years ago

        Jobs created/saved, etc. etc.

    3. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

      This is what you do with Gitmo.

  8. John   14 years ago

    http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler.....ty-suckas/

    "[T]he government-regulated utility will be able to decide when and where power should be delivered, to ensure that it meets the highest social purpose. Governments may, for example, decide that the needs of key industries take precedence over others, or that the needs of industry trump that of residential consumers. Governments would also be able to price power prohibitively if it is used for non-essential purposes."

    Environmentalism is nothing but 21st Century fascism.

    1. Scuffy Nerf Herder   14 years ago

      Wow. It's unusual when they just come right and say it. They're not even trying to hide it anymore, they're basking in their authoritarianism like Chavez.

    2. Jordan Elliot   14 years ago

      Seriously, when did the UK start looking at "1984" as a fucking guidebook?

      1. Nick   14 years ago

        About 1984 when they realized the nightmare hadn't come true and they were really far behind.

      2. TrickyVic   14 years ago

        Come on, it's the lords power, the lords can dole it out how they please. 😉

    3. Matrix   14 years ago

      So I guess people freezing in their homes or dying from the heat is acceptable to these idiots? Seriously, that idiot needs a curb check

      1. John   14 years ago

        What is worse is some people love this sort of thing. See e.g. below.

      2. db   14 years ago

        A few years ago one of the crazy hillbillies who live at the end of our dead end road froze to death. They couldn't get an ambulance back to his shack so they dragged him about a mile on a sled.

        1. Nick   14 years ago

          They should have just left him there.

    4. MNG   14 years ago

      Cuz when I think of fascism I don't think of pouring castor oil down the mouths of dissidents or concentration camps or flag-waving nationalistic rallies, I think about the nationalization of utilities...

      1. CaptainSmartass   14 years ago

        Why split hairs? Think of both!

      2. hmm   14 years ago

        Your hyperbole is not only flaccid, but it kind of contradicts history. So I must give you a frowny face.

        🙁

        1. Rich   14 years ago

          Flaccid Hyperbole could be a band name.

          1. Ice Nine   14 years ago

            It could be Hugh Hefner's nickname.

      3. mr simple   14 years ago

        Maybe if you've ever read a history book you would. Don't you have advanced degrees in and do research in PolySci, or am I thinking of someone else? I knew it was a useless degree, but still...

        1. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

          But MNG means well, so it's cool.

        2. Tulpa   14 years ago

          Seriously, the only possibility that doesn't put MNG in a bad light with comments like this is that he's just rah-rahing for team blue and doesn't really believe what he says.

          A poli sci PhD writing half the stuff he writes on here would be like me arguing that a negative times a negative is a negative, or that the derivative of f*g is f'*g'.

          1. Edwin   14 years ago

            you guys are comparing environmental regulation to fascism and HE'S the one who's rah-rahing or doesn't actually believe what he says?

            Oh wait, you DO actually believe environmental regulation is comparible with fascism? Oh OK, if that's the case then you actually have mental problems.

            1. Tulpa   14 years ago

              Fascism is a political/economic paradigm. It can be applied to environmental issues just as easily as it can be applied to any other issue in society.

              Like many leftists, you seem to be conflating the racism and militarism that was present in the two famous fascist societies with the philosophy of fascism itself. That would be like me saying that communism is inherently militaristic because of the USSR's history.

              1. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

                No. Really. As long as all are oppressed equally, it's cool.

              2. cynical   14 years ago

                When looking at an overall national policy and deciding whether it's fascist, militarism would definitely be an attribute to consider (racism, less so -- I think it was more of a pre-existing feature of society that fascism was able to exploit and turn into something horrific). However, I don't think militarism is a requirement -- a small country can go fascist while holding no illusions about its ability to successfully invade its neighbors. War is simply an excellent rationale for imposing a central command structure over the populace.

                But fascism has many attributes, and any given policy can be considered separately.

            2. cynical   14 years ago

              For what it's worth, we aren't comparing environmental regulation with fascism here, anyway. The environmental regulation was stupid, and is likely to create a much more volatile power supply, but it's just the Treaty of Versailles in this scenario.

              The fascist part is the rationing system that is being built to deal with the fluctuating power supply -- government (more or less) will be centrally controlling who is allowed to have electricity and who is not, and one can only imagine that this will be abused to serve political ends (in addition to presumably coming at the expense of the lower classes).

    5. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

      We've received a flyer from our utility several times, about installing a "smart thermostat". It would allow them to take control and turn down our heat or a/c when there is extra demand on the system.

      Every time, I say "no fucking way" and toss it right in the trash.

      1. Enough About Palin   14 years ago

        It's actually a good idea. The electric company gives you a discount and the only turn it down briefly.

        1. wylie   14 years ago

          I suppose, as long as you keep the old thermostat and are capable enough to hook it back up.

        2. TPTB   14 years ago

          And it'll stay that way, scout's honor!

        3. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

          It's actually a good idea. The electric company gives you a discount and the only turn it down briefly.

          The info they sent said it would save us $40 per year. For that pittance, I'll retain control of my own home's temperature, thankyouverymuch.

        4. R C Dean   14 years ago

          The electric company gives you a discount and the only turn it down briefly.

          Suuure they will.

        5. JW   14 years ago

          Not only no, but fuck no.

        6. 29InNet   14 years ago

          And the new tax is only temporary.

        7. EscapedWestOfTheBigMuddy   14 years ago

          On the other hand. If they instituted demand driven pricing and let me program the thing, I'd be interested.

          I mean, seriously, the right strategy might knock as much as 10% off the bill at a modest cost in comfort.

          But putting them in control is a non-starter.

      2. Virginia   14 years ago

        Maybe set it up in your freezer in the winter and hook it to your hot water heater in the summer. Then you get whatever incentive credit plus they don't mess with your power.

      3. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

        Yeah -- this is SOP in my neck of the woods. They install a radio-operated switch on my electric water heater so they can switch off and avoid a new peak. I get a break on my rate. It's never been switched off in 20 years. (Of course -- it was my choice to install the switch.)

    6. robc   14 years ago

      And people say the bad guys in Atlas Shrugged are cardboard cutouts. That quote is straight from AS, as I recall.

      1. db   14 years ago

        +10-289

    7. db   14 years ago

      Always remember: in the eyes of the authorities, YOU are "non-essential."

  9. JEP   14 years ago

    Go Egypt! The new prime minister is a Purdue University graduate in civil engineering. Represent!

    But no really, maybe he won't fuck up...

    1. Abdul   14 years ago

      You know who else was a civil engineer in Egypt and later went into politics? Yasser Arafat.

      And no one could say he ever fucked up?

      1. Scuffy Nerf Herder   14 years ago

        The advantage to being a civil engineer is that you get first hand experience with all of the development and real estate corruption. A primer in modern government.

      2. Trespassers W   14 years ago

        Yeah, but he went to Ball State.

    2. Timon19   14 years ago

      CivEs - those who couldn't cut it as MEs or EEs.

      1. robc   14 years ago

        Nah, thats Imaginary Engineers. Civils seemed to be that way from the start. Which is weird.

        I dont remember seeing much ME/EE->CE changes. ME/EE->IE. Yup, that happens.

        1. Tulpa   14 years ago

          Not being in the engineers' club, which segment of engineering are you referring to as Imaginary?

          1. robc   14 years ago

            IE - Imaginary Engineering

            Its a joke name for Industrial Engineering.

          2. Brett L   14 years ago

            Industrial Engineer == IE

      2. db   14 years ago

        You all wish you could be ChEs.

        1. robc   14 years ago

          No one has ever wished that.

          /NukE

        2. Brett L   14 years ago

          +1

      3. kinnath   14 years ago

        Civil Engineers build targets

    3. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

      I expect he'll get a three seed in Martial Madness.

  10. MNG   14 years ago

    Jesus H. Christ this is infuriating...

    Michigan Town Split on Child Pornography ChargesBy ERICA GOODE
    Published: March 7, 2011
    Recommend
    Twitter
    Sign In to E-Mail

    Print

    Single Page

    Reprints

    Share
    Close
    LinkedinDiggMixxMySpacePermalink. MUSKEGON, Mich. ? People in this economically pressed town near Lake Michigan are divided into two camps: Those who think Evan Emory should pay hard for what he did, and those who think he should be let off easy.

    Mr. Emory, 21, an aspiring singer and songwriter, became a household name here last month when he edited a video to make it appear that elementary school children in a local classroom were listening to him sing a song with graphic sexual lyrics. He then showed the video in a nightclub and posted it on YouTube.

    Tony Tague, the Muskegon County prosecutor, stands firmly in the first camp: He charged Mr. Emory with manufacturing and distributing child pornography, a crime that carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison and 25 years on the sex offender registry.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03.....?_r=1&hpw;

    1. Jordan Elliot   14 years ago

      This is still going on!? Jesus...

    2. Matrix   14 years ago

      Wow, just... wow! The guy does need a good kick in the groin, but he did NOTHING sexual to those kids. It is insanity that child pornography is even considered in this case. The prosecutor needs to be hanged, drawn and quartered.

      1. Cubistista   14 years ago

        In front of teh chilluns!!

    3. hmm   14 years ago

      I know have a massive knee jerk reaction to people saying "for the kids." This has proven problematic since a lot of friends are breeders and have little ones and say stupid shit like that all the time.

      1. hmm   14 years ago

        Lets use "I now..."

    4. generic Brand   14 years ago

      So kids (not actually) talking about sexual things is child pornography? Does that mean just about every 5th grader now is enveloped in the world of underage sex, since they often use words that I didn't even start saying until college?

      The stupid is strong with this one...

      1. Ska   14 years ago

        I'm really hoping the jury doesn't decide to ruin this guy's life and convict any way. It's pretty clear that this practical joke didn't expose the children (har har) to anything sexual, nor were they committing any sexual acts.

        The prosecutor obviously doesn't give a fuck about that, and will gladly sacrifice this amateur comedian for the sake of advancing his political career.

        Misguided attempts at humor =/= trafficking in child porn.

    5. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

      No castor oil, no fascism.

    6. Tulpa   14 years ago

      First, Emory was monumentally stupid to have done this. It's just asking for trouble these days -- and I'm totally down with the school firing him for it. I doubt he's going to be aspiring to much anymore.

      That said, SCOTUS has already come down against attempts to apply child pornography laws to material that merely makes it appear children are engaging in sex acts -- let alone hearing sexual terminology.

      1. sloopyinca   14 years ago

        When are the trials coming for MTV and the producers of Skins? Or Columbia pictures home video for re-releasing The Blue Lagoon on video?

        How about Ben Affleck for the portrayal of Shannon Hamilton having sex with the 15 year old Trisha Jones in Mallrats?
        "Who's your favorite new kid? Call me Joey. Call me Donnie. Oh, please don't go girl."

        1. Brett L   14 years ago

          Is it wrong of me to be okay with the thought of Ben Affleck being thrown in Federal Prison?

          1. nekoxgirl   14 years ago

            No, that's perfectly understandable.

            1. Shmenge   14 years ago

              The Town and Gone Baby Gone are entirely watchable. He was also pretty good in Hollywoodland.

              1. Black Jesus   14 years ago

                Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms.

      2. Really?   14 years ago

        The PROTECT Act of 2003 sort of undermined that decision.

  11. [Johnny] Longtorso   14 years ago

    Draw no conclusions from my putting an [article] on masterbation in the same [post] as the Mary Katharine Hamm [video]. I'm a gentleman.

    'FistGate' Goes Global: GLSEN Activist Promotes [Masturbation] at U.N. Conference

    Video - Hammertime: The New [Tone] is Finally Here

    1. SugarFree   14 years ago

      I dig chicks with giant face bones.

      1. John   14 years ago

        I have always thought MK Ham was pretty cute. Not lobster girl cute. But cute enough.

        1. SugarFree   14 years ago

          Mostly just wanted to say "giant face bones."

          1. Almanian   14 years ago

            Giant Face Bones would be an excellent name for a rock and roll band.

            1. Ice Nine   14 years ago

              It would be an excellent name for a John Holmes flick.

              1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                Why can't be both? To the time machine!

      2. Jordan Elliot   14 years ago

        Handlebars for the face fucking!

    2. [Johnny Longtorso]   14 years ago

      From the [masterbation] article:

      "Oral sex, masturbation, and orgasms need to be taught in education," Diane Schneider told the audience at a [United Nations conference] panel on combating homophobia and transphobia. Schneider, representing the National Education Association (NEA), the largest teachers union in the US, advocated for more "inclusive" sex education in US schools. . . . She claimed that the idea of sex education remains an oxymoron if it is abstinence-based, or if students are still able to opt-out.
      Comprehensive sex education is "the only way to combat heterosexism and gender conformity," Schneider proclaimed, "and we must make these issues a part of every middle and high-school student's agenda." . . .
      A panel sponsored in part by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) advocated for "comprehensive sex education" not only as a tool to combat "gender oppression," but also as the key to achieving all of the Millennium Development Goals.

      1. John   14 years ago

        Yeah, because people are incapable of figuring any of that out without the help of a friendly bureaucrat.

      2. Fet S. Kidd   14 years ago

        Oral sex, masturbation, and orgasms need to be taught in education

        OSMAO 101 is full *already*? Can I do independent study?

      3. Scuffy Nerf Herder   14 years ago

        Comprehensive sex education is "the only way to combat heterosexism and gender conformity,"

        So much for the passing on of impartial scientific knowledge.

        1. Rich   14 years ago

          "combat gender conformity"

          What does that even mean?

          1. SugarFree   14 years ago

            Little boys in pink dresses with frilly bows is a great idea.

            1. Rich   14 years ago

              But, bitch-slapping -- is it or is it not involved in this "combat"?

              1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                I would imagine that texting snide remarks will be the only form of fighting that will survive.

                "Your asshole whistles when you take a shit."

                1. Rich   14 years ago

                  I'm telling your mother you said that!

                  1. SugarFree   14 years ago

                    Diagnosis

                    1. Clich? Bandit   14 years ago

                      my mommy taught me not to click anything that ended in.jpg from people named sugar free.

                      assuming he didnt SF the link that is

                    2. Ska   14 years ago

                      I think this topic is begging for some Stare Dad.

      4. Tony Tague   14 years ago

        Don't worry guys, I'm on this

      5. Mary Kay Letourneau   14 years ago

        Yes, all of us in the NEA think we should be doing more to teach kids the ways of the world. Why should those stodgy old padres have all the fun?

      6. PermaLurker   14 years ago

        My high school Health teacher weighed 400 lbs and had a colostomy bag. The idea of him teaching masturbation is high octane nightmare fuel/fetish retardant.

        1. Brett L   14 years ago

          That's one way to instill an abstinence culture.

      7. Amakudari   14 years ago

        It's okay, it's only one step further than penis inspection day.

  12. [Johnny Longtorso]   14 years ago

    NPR executives caught on tape bashing [conservatives] and Tea Party, touting liberals
    ...In a new video released Tuesday morning by conservative filmmaker James O'Keefe, Schiller and Betsy Liley, NPR's director of institutional giving, are seen meeting with two men who, unbeknownst to the NPR executives, are posing as members of a Muslim Brotherhood front group. The men, who identified themselves Ibrahim Kasaam and Amir Malik from the fictitious Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC) Trust, met with Schiller and Liley at Caf? Milano, a well-known Georgetown restaurant, and explained their desire to give to $5 million to NPR because, "the Zionist coverage is quite substantial elsewhere."

    On the tapes, Schiller wastes little time before attacking conservatives. The Republican Party, Schiller says, has been "hijacked by this group." The man posing as Malik finishes the sentence by adding, "the radical, racist, Islamaphobic, Tea Party people." Schiller agrees and intensifies the criticism, saying that the Tea Party people aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist, racist people."...

    ...O'Keefe's organization set up a fake website for MEAC to lend credibility to the fictitious group. On the site, MEAC states that its mission is combating "intolerance to spread acceptance of Sharia across the world." At their lunch, the man posing as Kasaam told Schiller that MEAC contributes to a number of Muslim schools across the U.S. "Our organization was originally founded by a few members of the Muslim Brotherhood in America actually," he says....

    1. [Johnny Longtorso]   14 years ago

      ...Schiller doesn't blink. Instead, he assumes the role of fan. "I think what we all believe is if we don't have Muslim voices in our schools, on the air," Schiller says. "It's the same thing we faced as a nation when we didn't have female voices."...

    2. John   14 years ago

      Has there ever been a case of a MSM reporter caught with his guard down turning out to be anything but a hard left liberal?

      1. MNG   14 years ago

        Would it be reported in the conservative blogosphere if there were such a case?

        1. [Johnny Longtorso]   14 years ago

          He or she would be fired. It [would] be reported somewhere. Lets say a good MSM reporter says something racist on video. Does that sort of thing not get out? Given that libs think nonliberal = racist, I can only assume you [vermin] would treat political deviation the same way.

      2. hmm   14 years ago

        You can sell conservative, so no need to hide the bashing. You can't sell liberal (they all want it for free) so you have to hide it behind a thin veil of smegma.

        1. Nick   14 years ago

          Thin Veil of Spegma would be a good name for a...oh nevermind.

          1. Nick   14 years ago

            Correct spelling would also be good.

    3. Scuffy Nerf Herder   14 years ago

      Later in the lunch, Schiller explains that NPR would be better positioned free of federal funding. "Well frankly, it is clear that we would be better off in the long-run without federal funding," he says.

      1. Virginia   14 years ago

        It's too bad the one insider who thinks like us will soon be fired.

    4. Mike M.   14 years ago

      Schiller goes on to describe liberals as more intelligent and informed than conservatives.

      HAA-haa! Bet the schmuck doesn't feel quite so smart now.

      1. Brett L   14 years ago

        No, no, no. Cons are like the Irish, not smart but sneaky; accomplished liars and cheats. Of course he fell for it.

        1. sloopyinca   14 years ago

          Your description is more that of a Joo than a Mick.

    5. DanD   14 years ago

      When I'm getting ready for work, I usually listen to Morning Edition on NPR. This morning, they were talking about how bad the business cycle was in the late 19th and early 20th century:

      "It was the era of the robber barons. When too much wealth was in the hands of too few. Sound familiar?"

      Of course, the evidence they presented of this controversial economic assumption hinged upon a few selected works of contemporary art. There was no discussion of why the cycles were so bad, or the duration of said cycles, nor was anything said about the world economy. What the reader was left to assume was that the laissez-faire society at the time left everyone impoverished, and thank God big gummit is here to do something and save us now from long, drawn-out, job-killing recessions.

      1. Jersey Patriot   14 years ago

        The late 19th century wasn't laissez-faire.

        1. DanD   14 years ago

          Right, I'm saying that's what NPR is leading the reader listener to believe.

    6. Ska   14 years ago

      Here's the problem with this story - if you're in development you will basically say whatever the fuck it takes to get that $5 MM. That is your job. Does the NPR stooge believe what he's saying? It's quite possible, hell , even probable. But seriously the guy would probably agree with and embellish upon whatever the fuck you say to him if there's a fat ass check that comes with it.

      Unscrupulous? Yes. Unprincipled? Sure. But not the best gotcha moment I've ever seen.

      1. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

        Here's the problem with this story - if you're in development you will basically say whatever the fuck it takes to get that $5 MM. That is your job.

        So you're saying his reaction would be the same if the American Nazis came forward and offered togive NPR $5 million. Or maybe if NAMBLA did.

        In other words, he's an unprincipled fuckstick.

        1. Ska   14 years ago

          I think it depends on the group, but yes, I believe he can be bought. I believe he'd say whatever it takes to get that money. Slandering the Tea Party is easy - they're already Outlanders - so using hyperbolic insults that agree with the fictional Muslim donors' views are a no-brainer.

          I specifically called the behavior unprincipled.

        2. Tulpa   14 years ago

          Um, what? Since when does taking money from bad people make one unprincipled? Schiller is essentially a salesman.

          Ron Paul took money from flerking white supremacists, remember? And I'm sure Reason wouldn't refuse money from them either so long as there weren't strings attached.

          1. robc   14 years ago

            I dont think its the taking of the money that makes one an unprincipled fuckstick. It is what you say to get the money.

            1. Tulpa   14 years ago

              Good point, but a good salesman will (and should) say whatever it takes -- short of fraud -- to make the sale. And Schiller is a salesman, whatever his title is.

  13. MNG   14 years ago

    Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) announces retirement.

    Senator Ensign said he was retiring to get more time for the important business of shagging other people's wives.

    1. John   14 years ago

      I suppose that is better than shagging the tax payers.

      1. Restoras   14 years ago

        Much better.

    2. hmm   14 years ago

      At least he won't be fuckin' me. So fire up the viagra, coke, and booze and let the man get to fuckin'

  14. SugarFree   14 years ago

    Jezebel has strict policies about no "body snark" i.e. don't make fun of how other women look. I guess the wives of Republicans aren't women.

    1. John   14 years ago

      Women? Hell anyone who doesn't toe the party line doesn't even qualify as human to those people.

      1. Tulpa   14 years ago

        Jezebel's party lion is pretty heavy, so towing it is damn tough.

    2. Jordan Elliot   14 years ago

      You almost can't even make fun of this shit. It's that stupid and unaware.

      God I missed H&R for the reality checks. Thank you SF.

    3. hmm   14 years ago

      They are satan's spawn receptacles.

  15. Restoras   14 years ago

    In other news, China will have an even HUGER-ASS army very shortly...

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/b.....s-in-asia/

    1. Scuffy Nerf Herder   14 years ago

      Demographics are a bitch.

    2. hmm   14 years ago

      It's even worse for Asian men. It seems to me, at least anecdotally, that Asian women abroad don't date Asian men.

      1. Montani Semper Liberi   14 years ago

        Because western men treat women better on average.

        1. Almanian   14 years ago

          Lacist!

          1. Ice Nine   14 years ago

            +1

      2. DJF   14 years ago

        Its even worse for Chinese men since there are fewer Chinese woman. That whole 1 child policy really screws up demographics, especially in a society where having a male child is more important.

        1. db   14 years ago

          Look, it's simple. What we need is a Federal program to encourage Chinese men to immigrate. I say form a foreign legion of Chinese to fight our wars in Asia with the guarantee of citizenship for all who serve honorably. Then upon naturalization, the ICE will facilitate meetings between the new citizens and Jezebel readers. THREE birds, ONE stone.

          1. Brett L   14 years ago

            Wait, you want to trained and experienced soldiers with a reason to hate America and its government? I'm not sure this is the best idea.

      3. Charisma Man   14 years ago

        American men are so prized among Asian women that even MNG could get some action.

      4. Tulpa   14 years ago

        It would be interesting to see a careful statistical analysis of that. I'll grant that you see a lot more East Asian girls with non-East Asian guys than vice versa, but you also see a lot of East Asian couples.

        1. Nick   14 years ago

          It's sad when I see a hot Asian chick holding hands with an ugly Asian guy. She got rolled by tradition while he hit the lottery.

          1. Tulpa   14 years ago

            Pretty sure both hmm and I are talking about East Asian students in US colleges, who aren't nearly as bound by tradition.

            1. Nick   14 years ago

              That's what I'm saying. You do see that here, the hot Asian chick with an ugly Asian guy.

              I've seen plenty of decent looking black guys with gross looking white girls. I still have no explanation for that phenomena. I mean I understand why she would, but what's his problem? Some moron told me it was a "conquest" thing or a big "fuck you" to whitey but I don't think that works. No white guy except maybe the girl's father is gonna give him props for fucking a skank, especially an overweight one which seems to be prevalent. If anything we appreciate taking her out of the white chick pool, since you know, alcohol has its consequences.

              1. Nick   14 years ago

                Correction: No white guy except maybe the girl's father is gonna be pissed for the white girl fucking a black guy...

                You get the idea.

                1. Tulpa   14 years ago

                  Maybe in your socioeconomic stratum, Nick. But that's not the case in the strata where it's likely to be an issue.

          2. Tulpa   14 years ago

            And one could of course say the same thing about white women with ugly white guys rather than a black guy. Well, if that thought weren't uncomfortable for us ugly white guys.

            1. Un-PC   14 years ago

              But the black guys who are not pro athletes seem to go for the fat white chicks, while hot black chicks seem to go for the average white guy. Not a fair trade in my book, but not too shabby if you are a fat white chick or an average white guy.

              1. Tulpa   14 years ago

                I suspect you're comparing apples and oranges here. When you see an interacial, long-term couple, it's usually a black guy and white woman, and yes, usually the woman is nothing to write home about. But that's explainable by the fact that women are selected for attractiveness, while men are selected for wealth (at least when you're talking about long-term partnering). Unattractive white women and poor black men are therefore selected against and tend to pair up.

                In my anecdotal experience, white guy with black girl is exceedingly rare to begin with. Not sure what that's about.

                1. prolefeed   14 years ago

                  In my anecdotal experience, white guy with black girl is exceedingly rare to begin with. Not sure what that's about.

                  I'm guessing that it's about a lot of white guys haven't yet tasted black pussy.

        2. Amakudari   14 years ago

          To the wikis!

          Among all newlyweds in 2008 ... 41.7% of Native-Born Asian men out-married compared to 11.7% of Foreign-Born Asian men; 50.8% of Native-Born Asian women out-married compared to 36.8% of Foreign-Born Asian women.

          So the majority of US-born Asian-American women intermarry.

          1. Tulpa   14 years ago

            Considering they're living in a society that is overwhelmingly non-Asian, that's to be expected just by random chance.

            However, the difference in intermarriage rates between men and women is significant.

            1. Amakudari   14 years ago

              Not too much. Most Asians live in areas that have a lot of Asians, like New York, the Bay, or LA. The same marriage trends hold. I don't have a reference, but I know for a fact that most US-born Asians in the Bay (men and women) marry outside their ethnic group. Most parts of the Bay are 20-30% Asian.

              Here's a population percentage map, and the takeaway should be that the US's 5%-ish Asian-American population is not spread throughout the country but is heavily concentrated in a few urban areas (and more so than any whites, blacks or Hispanics).

              And you really only need a small community to avoid intermarriage historically. Jews, for example, didn't really begin intermarrying until the 70s.

              This isn't a rigorous survey, but the observation that Asians in the US have high rates of intermarriage should be fairly obvious. At least anecdotally, it is desirable for some of my Bay Area Asian-American female friends to find a guy with the same ethnic background for their parents' sake (this usually coming from second-generationers), and there's some inertia from the friends you have growing up, but those factors will turn more irrelevant with each generation.

    3. Matrix   14 years ago

      I've been saying for a few years now that China's 1-child policy was going to mean war, considering so many boys will be without girls. And think of all the girls that might be, in fact, lesbians. Even less for the pool of potential partners. Those women will more likely demand more from their prospective spouses by only going for better looks, income, and any other attribute. So even the fat and ugly chicks can land wealthy, handsome guys. The less attractive and poorer guys are going to be left out. Those guys will be wanting some, and they'll be looking at other countries to get it.

      1. Sikh Regiment   14 years ago

        Those guys will be wanting some, and they'll be looking at other countries to get it.

        Come at me, bro.

      2. Those Guys   14 years ago

        Those guys will be wanting some, and they'll be looking at other countries to get it.

        Canada. We're looking at Canada.

      3. Mike Laursen   14 years ago

        OK, don't mind if I do spend some time thinking about Chinese lesbians.

      4. generic Brand   14 years ago

        You're automatically assuming that it won't create internal strife. I would predict a civil war from the masses against the oppressive regime (that instituted the very 1-child policy we are discussing) before millions of Chinese impoverished start moving out into the world for women.

      5. Enough About Palin   14 years ago

        "And think of all the girls that might be, in fact, lesbians."

        It's all I do.

      6. CaptainSmartass   14 years ago

        And think of all the girls that might be, in fact, lesbians

        They'll be offset by a like-percentage of boys who are gay.

        Even so, you're left with millions of young men with no hope of ever finding a bride. Either they band together into the next great Yellow Horde, or they all try to emigrate to female-rich lands like Russia or India. It'll be interesting to see which way this goes.

        1. Amakudari   14 years ago

          Technically, there are more gays than lesbians, so this actually works in everyone's favor.

          Also, these problems could all be solved by having a lottery for mandatory gay marriage. China, I'm counting on you for this.

      7. Tulpa   14 years ago

        Actually, Chinese men are now getting mail-order brides from Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam. There are always going to be plenty of women in desperately poor countries for all the wealthy men in the world.

        China's gender ratio is only about 11:10, by the way -- a lot of Westerners seem to have the impression it's like 2:1 or more. Plus Chinese families are beginning to see the potential "investment" value of having girls, if you know what I mean, so the gender ratio of births in recent years is much closer to the natural one.

        1. Ska   14 years ago

          Mmm....free markets in action.

        2. R C Dean   14 years ago

          China's gender ratio is only about 11:10, by the way

          If there's a billion of 'em, give or take, doesn't that add up to, what, 50 million surplus men?

          I think that's enough to be a problem, personally.

          1. Cyto   14 years ago

            Polyandry? Is this a growth opportunity for the Mormons and Muslims?

            1. Nick   14 years ago

              That would be an idea to consider if the ratio were reversed. I don't think the Muslims and Mormons think too highly of a woman with multiple husbands.

  16. Barely Suppressed Rage   14 years ago

    Florida DOT engages in illegal program to detain and threaten with arrest anyone who pays a toll with a $20 or larger bill - and then when confronted about it, lies about its existence and tries to cover it up.

    They say it was necessary to combat counterfeit bills.

    Best part? They collected over $1.5 billion in tolls during the same period they collected $16,000 in counterfeit bills. And they spent $32,000 in printing forms and handouts to deal with the counterfeit bills problem.

    Lawsuit pending, as it damn well should be...

    1. Matrix   14 years ago

      I always love how governments tend to spend more money to fix a money problem than the money problem cost to begin with.

      1. SugarFree   14 years ago

        Are we talking about ObamaCare again?

    2. Montani Semper Liberi   14 years ago

      Damn, and I thought the PA Turnpike screwed me over when they charged me the price of traveling the entire road from NJ to Ohio when I only went like 20 miles because their ticket dispenser ran out of tickets.

      1. E Z Pass   14 years ago

        Let us track facilitate your travel.

      2. SFC B   14 years ago

        For the life of me I can't figure out why the Illinois tollway (or any tollway) can't come up with a disposable RFID tag. I drive to Chicago about 3 times a year and I'd rather not get the iPass. I'd be willing to pay a premium to get a temporary, disposable transponder which I could pre-pay, use the iPass lanes for my visit, and then toss when I am done.

        1. Tulpa   14 years ago

          But then they couldn't track your movements, calculate your average speed for law enforcement purposes, etc. WE NEED A NAME.

          1. Citizen Nothing   14 years ago

            Not "fascism," that's for sure! (Oh, wait -- is castor oil involved or not?)

  17. Clich? Bandit   14 years ago

    Yo, Brickbat today is MESSED UP!

    Fashizzle

  18. Brett L   14 years ago

    Bill Gates plus Warren Buffet have about $97B in assets between them. Even if you add in the next five richest people in the US, you don't get to $200B. I don't know how they're gonna steal $1.5T from rich people.

    1. DNS   14 years ago

      Even if you add in the next five richest people in the US, you don't get to $200B. I don't know how they're gonna steal $1.5T from rich people.

      Arithmetic - how does it work?

  19. P Brooks   14 years ago
  20. P Brooks   14 years ago

    Fucking squirrels.

    Bill Gates plus Warren Buffet have about $97B in assets between them.

    Wealth tax!

    (If you think the Income Tax is an invasion of privacy, just wait.)

    1. db   14 years ago

      Look, Buffett and Gates have already said they're giving away all their wealth to charity. I propose the government simply speed up the process by confiscating the rest right now. There are people who need this money now and it's simply barbarous to allow this wealth to moulder away unused. Need=value.

  21. Brett L   14 years ago

    I found out today that Florida has no statutes prohibiting sexual contact between a person and an animal. Today is the opening day of our annual Legislative session, and apparently a State Senator is trying (for the 3rd session in a row!) to change this.

    Who knew the animal husbandry lobby was so powerful? Apparently our Lege is full of sheepfuckers.

    1. Joel Pile   14 years ago

      Pack my bags, I'm movin' to Florida!

      1. sloopyinca   14 years ago

        Banhammer in 3..2..1..

    2. Frightened Sheep   14 years ago

      Wh.. what happened to his first two attempts?

      1. Brett L   14 years ago

        Passed the Senate and died in the lower chamber. Not sure why. Its a short session, so maybe it just isn't important to pass a law that will affect 3 people/year. Maybe the sponsor is a Democrat.

    3. sloopyinca   14 years ago

      If the sheep are the man's property, why do we have an issue with his use of that property as a living fleshlight?

      1. Tulpa   14 years ago

        I suppose you think it's OK for a woman to have sex with her unborn child then.

  22. Kant feel Pietzsche   14 years ago

    Not really sure how Balko managed to avoid offering us this nut punch.

    He did post it last October in the Agitator.

    Summary, according to officer Sergio Vergillo:

    Woman and methed-up son get in argument. Woman calls 911. Cops enter mobile home and confront son. Son tells them to get the fuck out if they have no warrant. Officer Richard Chrisman pulls gun, puts it to son's head and says "I don't need a warrant, motherfucker".

    They taze him twice, pepper spray him. Then Chrisman pulls his gun, shoots the son's dog (who is sitting in the corner barking), and then ultimately puts a few rounds in the son, who was not a threat at the time, according to Vergillo.

    1. Kant feel Pietzsche   14 years ago

      I did some background on this shooting, and it just gets better and better. Talk about a snake pit.

      Richard Chrisman, the cop who did the shooting, was eventually indicted for 2nd degree murder.

      Chrisman was on the County's "Brady List" ( a list of almost 500 officers who have damaged credibility due to lying under oath at some point) for a 2005 incident in which he and a female officer were caught on surveillance video planting a crack pipe on a mentally ill homeless woman being arrested for an outstanding warrant.

      Chrisman claimed that it was done "to mess" with the woman, and they had no intent to actually charge her. He got suspended for one whole day for that. Ironically, the head of Internal Affairs for Phoenix PD, is also on that list.

      Chrisman is also one of 28 officers who were investigated for fraud for falsifying time sheets for off-duty event security work. Phoenix PD cops do about $30 million/yr worth of such business. 3 were indicted, the other 25 (including Chrisman) were not, but were suspended from doing further off-duty work. Internal Affairs is determining any further disciplinary action against the 25. A 4th "retired" officer (if that's what you can call an 18 yo veteran who lost his pension) was also indicted.

      One other cop, Sergeant Sean Drenth, was mysteriously found shot to death near the State Capitol last October, and homicide detectives are investigating a link between the two cases. The Chief of Police indicated that if Drenth were still alive, he probably would be facing felony theft charges.

      The wife of Sergio Vergillo, the cop who ratted Chrisman out, was convicted of trafficking in meth and coke in 2008 and got 3 years probation. She apparently was taking undercover operations info from her husband, who was a narcotics detective at the time, and passing it on to her drug-dealer brother. Guess it's pretty obvious why Vergillo is now a beat cop instead of a detective.

      Of course, Chrisman's lawyer is playing that up to try and discredit Vergillo's testimony against his client.

      PLEA, the local police union who footed Chrisman's $150,000 bond and is allegedly paying his legal fees, is currently under investigation for obstruction and witness tampering for trying to get Vergillo to change his story. Chrisman is a union member, Vergillo is not.

      1. Kant feel Pietzsche   14 years ago

        Oh, that's "18 year veteran", not 18 yo veteran.

      2. Amakudari   14 years ago

        Chrisman was on the County's "Brady List" (a list of almost 500 officers who have damaged credibility due to lying under oath at some point). ...

        The head of Internal Affairs for Phoenix PD, is also on that list.

        I don't see any problems here.

  23. TrickyVic   14 years ago

    Amtrak not happy with TSA.

    http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/for.....59127.aspx

  24. ????? ??????   13 years ago

    Thanks

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Big, Beautiful Bill Finds Its Opponents

Liz Wolfe | 6.30.2025 9:30 AM

School Choice Could Fix the Conflicts That Led to the Supreme Court's Mahmoud Decision

J.D. Tuccille | 6.30.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Fool Me Once…

Charles Oliver | 6.30.2025 4:00 AM

The Coming Techlash Could Kill AI Innovation Before It Helps Anyone

Kevin Frazier | 6.29.2025 7:00 AM

Social Security and Medicare Are Racing Toward Drastic Cuts—Yet Lawmakers Refuse To Act

Veronique de Rugy | 6.29.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!