Foodborne Illness Down Even Before the FDA Starts Further Regulating
The Centers for Disease Control released new figures on the prevalence of foodborne illness in the United States. And there is good news. Previous CDC reports regularly estimated that 5,000 Americans died of foodborne illnesses and that 325,000 were hospitalized annually. The new CDC estimates find that 3,000 Americans die of foodborne illness and 128,000 are hospitalized. This means that your chance of dying of foodborne illness is just a bit over 1 in 100,000 per year, and your chance of being hospitalized about 1 in 2,500.
Congress just passed the Food Safety Act giving the FDA vastly more power to regulate food production. It will be interesting to see if the rate of decrease in foodborne illness speeds up.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Foodborne illness is a leading indicator.
Congress just passed the Food Safety Act...
My theory is that foodborne illness is caused by eating too much 'clean' food. I lived in Tijuana and travelled a lot in SE Asia when I was younger, got mildly sick a couple of times and now can eat just about anything without getting sick.
Isn't that basic Immunology? Lack of exposure results in a lack of protection?
Our new regulations retroactively worked!
Scary scary big numbers! The only answer is to give us more money and control!
It worked even before we did it! Can't you see that's why we need it so bad?
I'm more interested in hospital-borne illnesses.
Based on the FDA's retroactive success, the DHHS should do wonders for hospital-borne illness.
(once gov't-run single payer begins, around 2017)
If illnesses decrease, the regulations worked. If illnesses do not decrease, more regulations are needed. Rinse, repeat.
PBS News Hour went with a different headline. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/ru.....finds.html
I'm confused. I give up. Who's telling the truth? Is the Kochtopus a monster?